d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1493449354936493749385001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jul 15 2025 01:39am
Once upon a time in the magical kingdom of AmericaLand, King Donald the Orange unveiled what he called a “tremendous” plan to end the war in the distant land of Ukrussia. Wearing a crown made of fast food wrappers, he proudly announced, “We give Ukraine more boom-boom sticks and tell Russia to stop fighting in exactly 50 days, or we give Ukraine even more weapons!” The royal advisors sniggered and smirked at their foolish leader. “Your absolutely right Sire, we already gave them tanks, F-16s, and Patriot missiles. more firepower is exactly what we need to bring permanent peace to the world!” King Donald beamed, basking in their praise while brandishing a golden stopwatch. “I’ve done peace before. North Korea. Pakistan. Tremendous peace. The best. Everyone says so.”

To set his master plan in motion, King Donald sent a glittery, strongly-worded postcard to President Vlad the Shirtless, which read:
“Dear Vlad,
Stop war in 50 days.
Or else: Ukraine gets more toys.
We steal more of your money.
I unfriend you.
Love, Donald ‘The Peacemaker’ Trump.”

Meanwhile, in the real world, many scratched their heads. “Didn’t the U.S. already escalate the war with hundreds of billions in weapons, sanctions, and failed diplomacy? Didn’t they reject peace talks and bomb Iran out of nowhere?” “Yes,” replied a wise old owl on Twitter, “and now they think that dumping more weapons into a war zone will somehow cause peace. It’s like throwing gasoline on a fire and expecting it to turn into a hot tub.” After all, this strategy worked so well for Israel—keep arming one side, kill thousands, and repeat the phrase ‘we want peace’ with a straight face on TV. But King Donald remained undeterred. “Trust me,” he said with his signature confidence. “I’ve ended more wars than I’ve read books.”

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 15 2025 01:42am
Member
Posts: 39,628
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Jul 15 2025 01:48am
Once upon a time in the magical kingdom of AmericaLand, King Donald the Orange unveiled what he called a “tremendous” plan to end the war in the distant land of Ukrussia. Wearing a crown made of fast food wrappers, he proudly announced, “We give Ukraine more boom-boom sticks and tell Russia to stop fighting in exactly 50 days, or we give Ukraine even more weapons!” The royal advisors sniggered and smirked at their foolish leader. “Your absolutely right Sire, we already gave them tanks, F-16s, and Patriot missiles. more firepower is exactly what we need to bring permanent peace to the world!” King Donald beamed, brandishing a golden stopwatch. “I’ve done peace before. North Korea. Pakistan. Tremendous peace. The best. Everyone says so.”

To set his master plan in motion, King Donald sent a glittery, strongly-worded postcard to President Vlad the Shirtless, which read:
“Dear Vlad,
Stop war in 50 days.
Or else: Ukraine gets more toys.
We steal your money.
I unfriend you.
Love, Donald ‘The Peacemaker’ Trump.”

Meanwhile, in the real world, many scratched their heads. “Didn’t the U.S. already escalate the war with hundreds of billions in weapons, sanctions, and failed diplomacy? Didn’t they reject peace talks and bomb Iran out of nowhere?” “Yes,” replied a wise old owl on Twitter, “and now they think that dumping more weapons into a war zone will somehow cause peace. It’s like throwing gasoline on a fire and expecting it to turn into a hot tub.” After all, this strategy worked so well for Israel—keep arming one side, kill thousands, and repeat the phrase ‘we want peace’ with a straight face on TV. But King Donald remained undeterred. “Trust me,” he said with his signature confidence. “I’ve ended more wars than I’ve read books.”


I’ve got a theory- he turned orange after that incident with Russian hookers at the hotel. Classic false-flag op. Turns out the "love priestesses" were actually Ukrainians from Chernobyl. Radiation does wonders for the complexion.
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jul 15 2025 07:04am
came across this earlier - Dmitry Trenin: World War III has already begun

Many now speak of humanity's drift towards World War III, imagining events similar to those of the 20th century. But war evolves. It will not begin with a June 1941 Barbarossa-style invasion or a Cuban Missile Crisis-style nuclear standoff. In fact, the new world war is already underway - it's just that not everyone has recognized it yet. For Russia, the pre-war period ended in 2014. For China, it was 2017. For Iran, 2023. Since then, war - in its modern, diffuse form - has intensified. This is not a new Cold War. Since 2022, the West's campaign against Russia has grown more decisive. The risk of direct nuclear confrontation with NATO over the Ukraine conflict is rising. Donald Trump's return to the White House created a temporary window in which such a clash could be avoided, but by mid-2025, hawks in the US and Western Europe had pushed us dangerously close again. This war involves the world's leading powers: the United States and its allies on one side, China and Russia on the other. It is global, not because of its scale, but because of the stakes: the future balance of power. The West sees the rise of China and the resurgence of Russia as existential threats. Its counteroffensive, economic and ideological, is meant to put a halt to that shift.

It is a war of survival for the West, not just geopolitically but ideologically. Western globalism - whether economic, political, or cultural - cannot tolerate alternative civilizational models. Post-national elites in the US and Western Europe are committed to preserving their dominance. A diversity of worldviews, civilizational autonomy, and national sovereignty are seen not as options, but as threats. This explains the severity of the West's response. When Joe Biden told Brazil's President Lula that he wanted to "destroy" Russia, he revealed the truth behind euphemisms like "strategic defeat." Western-backed Israel has shown how total this doctrine is - first in Gaza, then Lebanon, and finally Iran. In early June, a similar strategy was used in attacks on Russian airfields. Reports suggest US and British involvement in both cases. To Western planners, Russia, Iran, China and North Korea are part of a single axis. That belief shapes military planning. Compromise is no longer part of the game. What we're seeing are not temporary crises but rolling conflicts. Eastern Europe and the Middle East are the two current flashpoints. A third has long been identified: East Asia, particularly Taiwan. Russia is directly engaged in Ukraine, holds stakes in the Middle East, and may become involved in the Pacific.

The war is no longer about occupation, but destabilization. The new strategy focuses on sowing internal disorder: economic sabotage, social unrest, and psychological attrition. The West's plan for Russia is not defeat on the battlefield, but gradual internal collapse. Its tactics are all-encompassing. Drone strikes target infrastructure and nuclear facilities. Political assassinations are no longer off-limits. Journalists, negotiators, scientists, and even their families are being hunted. Residential neighborhoods, schools, and hospitals are not collateral damage - they are targets. This is total war. This is underpinned by dehumanization. Russians are portrayed not just as enemies but as subhuman. Western societies are manipulated to accept this. Information control, censorship, and historical revisionism are used to justify the war. Those who question the dominant narrative are labelled traitors.

Meanwhile, the West exploits the more open systems of its adversaries. After refusing to interfere in foreign politics for decades, Russia now finds itself on the defensive. But those days must end. As our enemies coordinate their attacks, we must disrupt their unity. The European Union is not a monolith. Hungary, Slovakia, and much of southern Europe are not eager for escalation. These internal fractures must be widened. Western strength lies in unity among its elites and their ideological control over their populations. But this unity is not invulnerable. The Trump administration presents tactical opportunities. His return has already reduced US involvement in Ukraine. Yet Trumpism should not be romanticized. The American elite remains largely hostile to Russia. There will be no new detente.

The war in Ukraine is becoming a war between Western Europe and Russia. British and French missiles already strike Russian targets. NATO intelligence is embedded in Ukrainian operations. EU countries are training Ukrainian forces and planning attacks together. Ukraine is just a tool. Brussels is preparing for a wider war. What we must ask is: Is Western Europe preparing to defend or attack? Many of its leaders have lost their strategic judgment. But the hostility is real. The goal is no longer containment, but to "solve the Russian question" once and for all. Any illusion that business as usual will return must be discarded.

We are in for a long war. It will not end like in 1945, nor settle into Cold War coexistence. The decades ahead will be turbulent. Russia must fight for its rightful place in a new world order. So, what must we do? First of all, we must strengthen our home front. We need mobilization, but not the rigid models of the Soviet past. We need smart, adaptive mobilization across all sectors - economic, technological, and demographic. Russia's political leadership is a strategic asset. It must remain steady and visionary. We must promote internal unity, social justice, and patriotism. Every citizen must feel the stakes. We must align our fiscal, industrial, and technological policy with the realities of a long-term war. Fertility policy and migration control must reverse our demographic decline. Secondly, we must consolidate our external alliances. Belarus is a strong ally in the west. North Korea has shown reliability in the east. But we lack a similar partner in the south. This gap must be addressed. The Israel-Iran war offers important lessons. Our adversaries coordinate tightly. We must do the same. Not by copying NATO, but by forging our own model of strategic cooperation. We should also pursue tactical engagement with the Trump administration. If it allows us to weaken the US war effort in Europe, we should exploit it. But we must not confuse tactics with strategy. American foreign policy remains fundamentally adversarial. Fellow European powers like Britain, France, and Germany must be made to understand they are vulnerable. Their capitals are not immune. The same message should reach Finland, Poland, and the Baltics. Provocations must be met swiftly and decisively. If escalation is inevitable, we must consider pre-emptive action - firstly with conventional arms. And if necessary, we must be ready to use 'special means', including nuclear weapons, with full awareness of the consequences. Deterrence must be both passive and active. Our mistake in Ukraine was waiting too long. Delay created the illusion of weakness. That must not be repeated. Victory means breaking the enemy's plans, not occupying territory.

Finally, we must penetrate the West's information shield. The battlefield now includes narratives, alliances, and public opinion. Russia must once again learn to engage in others' domestic politics, not as an aggressor, but as a defender of truth. The time for illusions is over. We are in a world war. The only path forward is through bold, strategic action. This article was first published by the magazineProfileand was translated and edited by the RT team.

----------

If this is anything to go by, its full steam ahead.
Member
Posts: 30,029
Joined: Mar 24 2019
Gold: 111.63
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2025 07:23am
this war takes to long :wacko:
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jul 15 2025 07:29am
this war takes to long :wacko:


its going to get a whole lot worse.
Member
Posts: 9,670
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 11,200.00
Jul 15 2025 08:15am
its going to get a whole lot worse.


Idk man…I’m just not seeing it tbh
Putin, Xi, Lukashenko are the last fronts that prevent their nations from failing into capitalism. At this point capitalism are having proxy wars with Russia and China, but neither of these nations have honestly put their foot down…which I believe it will come to that point in Ukraine soon if Trump does send weapons there. Putin will just get fed up and annihilate it into submission. I don’t see the next move after that. I truly don’t think the world or the US will go to war with Russia. That I believe would mean the end of the world. Everyone knows that and no one, not even the Islamist, want that.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2025 08:28am
Idk man…I’m just not seeing it tbh
Putin, Xi, Lukashenko are the last fronts that prevent their nations from failing into capitalism. At this point capitalism are having proxy wars with Russia and China, but neither of these nations have honestly put their foot down…which I believe it will come to that point in Ukraine soon if Trump does send weapons there. Putin will just get fed up and annihilate it into submission. I don’t see the next move after that. I truly don’t think the world or the US will go to war with Russia. That I believe would mean the end of the world. Everyone knows that and no one, not even the Islamist, want that.


Capitalism = euphemism for Jews?
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Jul 15 2025 09:31am
Idk man…I’m just not seeing it tbh
Putin, Xi, Lukashenko are the last fronts that prevent their nations from failing into capitalism. At this point capitalism are having proxy wars with Russia and China, but neither of these nations have honestly put their foot down…which I believe it will come to that point in Ukraine soon if Trump does send weapons there. Putin will just get fed up and annihilate it into submission. I don’t see the next move after that. I truly don’t think the world or the US will go to war with Russia. That I believe would mean the end of the world. Everyone knows that and no one, not even the Islamist, want that.


From a reasonable perspective I completely agree with you. The reality is that not everyone is reasonable.
Member
Posts: 28,861
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 15 2025 09:50am
Idk man…I’m just not seeing it tbh
Putin, Xi, Lukashenko are the last fronts that prevent their nations from failing into capitalism. At this point capitalism are having proxy wars with Russia and China, but neither of these nations have honestly put their foot down…which I believe it will come to that point in Ukraine soon if Trump does send weapons there. Putin will just get fed up and annihilate it into submission. I don’t see the next move after that. I truly don’t think the world or the US will go to war with Russia. That I believe would mean the end of the world. Everyone knows that and no one, not even the Islamist, want that.


Not really capitalism but western world order. It's basically telling the world you have to do what we tell you or else. Militarily, politically, economically, who you trade and who you're friends with.

I don't think it's working as well as Trump wants it. Tariffs are a good example. Many thought, including myself that many of these partners that inherently dependent on the US would blink and cave by now. Japan is a good example, most thought this would be a lay up as they've been so incredibly appeasing to US global policy over last 50 years. Instead they are also digging in not wanting to give too much up on tariffs.

This is kind of a double edged sword. The more you push on a country, there's always the chance they decide to tell you to fuck off if not publicly, quietly as they reposition. Brazil for example is not going to yield a bunch of trade disadvantages and maybe sacrifice its trade with China to appease Trump, and the more Trump presses on Brazil, the more likely they are to turn to China for even bigger piece of their trade.

In 50 years don't be surprised if Japan and China are much friendlier, while our influence over Japan has diminished significantly.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Jul 15 2025 09:51am
Member
Posts: 9,234
Joined: Jul 28 2007
Gold: 11,301.28
Jul 15 2025 10:15am
Not really capitalism but western world order. It's basically telling the world you have to do what we tell you or else. Militarily, politically, economically, who you trade and who you're friends with.

I don't think it's working as well as Trump wants it. Tariffs are a good example. Many thought, including myself that many of these partners that inherently dependent on the US would blink and cave by now. Japan is a good example, most thought this would be a lay up as they've been so incredibly appeasing to US global policy over last 50 years. Instead they are also digging in not wanting to give too much up on tariffs.

This is kind of a double edged sword. The more you push on a country, there's always the chance they decide to tell you to fuck off if not publicly, quietly as they reposition. Brazil for example is not going to yield a bunch of trade disadvantages and maybe sacrifice its trade with China to appease Trump, and the more Trump presses on Brazil, the more likely they are to turn to China for even bigger piece of their trade.

In 50 years don't be surprised if Japan and China are much friendlier, while our influence over Japan has diminished significantly.


It's a new concept to some people that all our actions have consequences.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1493449354936493749385001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll