d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1489548964897489848995001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,710
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
May 17 2025 04:13pm
Think the Russians capped it to 909 per exchange. What's crazy is how that number has shifted up by such a magnitude from 2024 to 2025. I think we all know the Russian KIA numbers are higher than 34, because as they are pushing they are probably collecting their own dead, so it's probably in the hundreds/month but we have no way of knowing.

If we use the Ukrainian number as a potential proxy of monthly losses it seems to be going up. These are bodies that are collected btw, there's probably just as many that are unrecoverable, whether blown to bits or buried under ruble.


Yeah it wouldn't reflect casualty numbers but it probably would correlate loosely with PoWs, you don't usually take PoWs unless you are advancing. I doubt Ukraine holds anywhere near as many as Russia, so the question is how many each side still have. Does Ukraine even have 1000 russian soldiers, or are they going to trade civilians taken from Kursk or the DPR/LPR?

Kursk is also why that number went way up. Even if both sides had equal casualties only the Ukrainian ones would need repatriation
Member
Posts: 50,710
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
May 18 2025 04:54pm
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/estonia-says-russia-detained-tanker-baltic-sea-2025-05-18/

Russia has retaliated against the Estonian attempt to seize one of its tankers (Russian fleet, but Gabon flagged or whatever) in international waters a few days ago (thwarted when Russia scrambled a jet into Estonian airspace above international waters, the maritime borders are complicated)
Russia has now seized an oil tanker leaving an Estonian port (Greek owned, Liberia flagged).

Quote
Russia has detained a Greek oil tanker sailing under the Liberian flag as it left the Estonian port of Sillamae on a previously agreed route through Russian waters, the Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs says.
In a statement published on Sunday, the ministry added that the vessel, the Green Admire, was undertaking a navigational route established in a deal between Russia, Estonia and Finland.
The Baltic nation will redirect traffic to and from Sillamea exclusively through Estonian waters to prevent similar incidents in the future, it added.
“Today’s incident shows that Russia continues to behave unpredictably,” Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said. “I have also informed our allies of the event,” he said, referring to other NATO members.
Estonian Public Broadcasting (EPB), citing the Transport Administration, reported that the Greek tanker was carrying a cargo of shale oil destined for Rotterdam in the Netherlands. It added that such incidents had never occurred before.


Refer to the map I posted 2 pages ago. Sillamae is just west of Narva on that map, and there is a route through Estonian waters but presumably traffic in peacetime is supposed to travel along that international waters path and cut towards the ports, so you'd have to zig zag to avoid the Russian territorial waters that juts out. IE sail to the edge of Russian waters, cut towards Kunda, travel the coast to Sillamae. Instead they used a "previously agreed route through Russian waters". Which the Russians agreed to before Estonian started harassing them.
Member
Posts: 28,861
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
May 18 2025 05:41pm
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/estonia-says-russia-detained-tanker-baltic-sea-2025-05-18/

Russia has retaliated against the Estonian attempt to seize one of its tankers (Russian fleet, but Gabon flagged or whatever) in international waters a few days ago (thwarted when Russia scrambled a jet into Estonian airspace above international waters, the maritime borders are complicated)
Russia has now seized an oil tanker leaving an Estonian port (Greek owned, Liberia flagged).



Refer to the map I posted 2 pages ago. Sillamae is just west of Narva on that map, and there is a route through Estonian waters but presumably traffic in peacetime is supposed to travel along that international waters path and cut towards the ports, so you'd have to zig zag to avoid the Russian territorial waters that juts out. IE sail to the edge of Russian waters, cut towards Kunda, travel the coast to Sillamae. Instead they used a "previously agreed route through Russian waters". Which the Russians agreed to before Estonian started harassing them.


FAFO

The baltics will have to live next to the big bad bear for the next 100, 200, 300 years. Such short sightedness in antagonizing the Russians. None of us know if NATO is going to last another 50-100 years, most of us can accurately predict Russia remains Estonia's neighbor. This is really pissing in the wind behavior.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on May 18 2025 05:42pm
Member
Posts: 50,710
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
May 18 2025 05:58pm
FAFO

The baltics will have to live next to the big bad bear for the next 100, 200, 300 years. Such short sightedness in antagonizing the Russians. None of us know if NATO is going to last another 50-100 years, most of us can accurately predict Russia remains Estonia's neighbor. This is really pissing in the wind behavior.


It makes no sense to me how ships traveling to Estonia could continue using a route through Russian waters in the week after Estonia tried to seize a ship in international waters.
This is the most predictable retaliation, in fact the most unpredictable part of it is that it was possible at all because they should have immediately changed routes so this isn't possible.
Its not even proportional, Russia seized a ship in its own waters, Estonia tried to seize one in the narrow channel that's international waters but Estonian airspace

You know this is made all the more dangerous by the fact NATO powers that are saber rattling are also acting incompetently? That's a bad combination for obvious reasons
Member
Posts: 39,633
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
May 20 2025 08:48pm
Member
Posts: 50,710
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
May 20 2025 11:10pm


The irony being that the pro-war EU has been itching to deport Ukrainian men who fled the country so they can be fed into the EU's meat grinder, while the US and EU have been granting asylum to fighting age male refugees from countries like Syria, Ethiopia, etc fleeing instead of fighting in their wars. Now they're loosely aligned with Trump's goals. The difference being the krauts don't want to give up all the ukrainian women they hold as sex slaves in their brothels
Member
Posts: 9,234
Joined: Jul 28 2007
Gold: 11,301.28
May 21 2025 12:13am
The irony being that the pro-war EU has been itching to deport Ukrainian men who fled the country so they can be fed into the EU's meat grinder, while the US and EU have been granting asylum to fighting age male refugees from countries like Syria, Ethiopia, etc fleeing instead of fighting in their wars. Now they're loosely aligned with Trump's goals. The difference being the krauts don't want to give up all the ukrainian women they hold as sex slaves in their brothels


I recommend getting some fresh air and limiting your internet time to 10 minutes a day.
Member
Posts: 39,633
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
May 21 2025 02:32am
Grateful descendants from the village of Sursko-Lytowske destroyed the monument to their fellow villagers who died in World War II to spite Russians and Putin.




This post was edited by Norlander on May 21 2025 02:32am
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
May 21 2025 06:09am
Russian advances in Donetsk have picked up over the past few days as their spring-summer offensive gains steam.

The Russian bridgehead across the Oskil (North Kharkhiv) has also been steadily expanding, to the point where Russia almost has a clear transport line from their border to north of Kupiansk. If the recent Russo-Ukrainian talks are anything to go by, Russia is preparing to include part/all of Kharkiv in any settlement.

Member
Posts: 28,861
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
May 21 2025 06:16am
Russian advances in Donetsk have picked up over the past few days as their spring-summer offensive gains steam.

The Russian bridgehead across the Oskil (North Kharkhiv) has also been steadily expanding, to the point where Russia almost has a clear transport line from their border to north of Kupiansk. If the recent Russo-Ukrainian talks are anything to go by, Russia is preparing to include part/all of Kharkiv in any settlement.


Have you followed recent peace talks?

Ukrainians basically said they will continue to seek NATO membership and will yield no territory. The mineral deal was a mistake, they have zero reason to pursue peace because western countries continue to pile in money and weapons. As long as the power structure there and their minions continue to get paid (very handsomely vs peace time alternative) they are going to want the war to go on.

The only way this war ends IMO is if the west pulls the plug. Giving Ukraine deals gives the impression that support will continue as long as US gets some sort of economic benefit.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1489548964897489848995001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll