Quote (Subwoofer @ Feb 12 2022 05:44am)

Just to clarify bitchute isn't a book sooooo "sites like this seem to have been purposefully crafted to confuse and mislead people" applies to it as well in your argument.

"what you have been mislead to think of as truth, is just a personal interpretation of facts :mellow: actual truth is just stating those facts"

Glad you also agree with what i've been saying the entire time except stating facts is stating facts.

Quote (Snyft2 @ Feb 11 2022 08:58pm)

it seems you are taking this too personally :(

i didnt say you should NEVER use sites, you can find true and false things both on sites and in books. but try to use books as a base as they cant be deleted or rewritten if you own the copy. what is stated in my dictionary will be stated there as long as that book exists, its not going to be rewritten by a random dude in the middle of the night <_<

basically just use your head :blush: ! if i say that water molecule is made of hydrogen and oxygen, its not my truth or your truth, it is just that, truth. factual information. now, if you think otherwise, it is your belief, your personal interpretation of chemistry. a belief may or may not be true. but truth is NOT a belief and there is nothing personal about it

Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 12 2022 06:04am)

the RNA world hypothesis being retracted is not something ev1 knows. it makes many people up set.
it used to be the darling of abiogenesis. the excuse to turn away from God. so when they find out the lie is exposed they can get angry.

Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 11 2022 10:57pm)

lol ................except your "false"

86 Synonyms & Antonyms for TRUTH | Thesaurus.com
https://www.thesaurus.com › browse › truth
synonyms for truth · accuracy · authenticity · certainty ·fact· legitimacy · principle · truthfulness · veracity ...
‎Truthfulness · ‎Honest truth · ‎Gospel truth · ‎Naked truth

Synonym
A synonym is a word, morpheme, or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word, morpheme, or phrase in a given language. For example, in the English language, the words begin, start, commence, and initiate are all synonyms of one another: they are synonymous. Wikipedia

the truth is.........your false and so was the chit RNA world hypothesis paper.

Quote (Snyft2 @ Feb 11 2022 10:58pm)

it seems you are taking this too personally :(

i didnt say you should NEVER use sites, you can find true and false things both on sites and in books. but try to use books as a base as they cant be deleted or rewritten if you own the copy. what is stated in my dictionary will be stated there as long as that book exists, its not going to be rewritten by a random dude in the middle of the night <_<

basically just use your head :blush: ! if i say that water molecule is made of hydrogen and oxygen, its not my truth or your truth, it is just that, truth. factual information. now, if you think otherwise, it is your belief, your personal interpretation of chemistry. a belief may or may not be true. but truth is NOT a belief and there is nothing personal about it

edit: i cant believe they are rewriting meanings of words known to everyone, and i REALLY cant believe that they are actually pulling it off :mellow:

Quote (Subwoofer @ Feb 11 2022 09:34pm)

Like seriously....read. When's the last time someone was like "Hey it's mostly a fact" with any sort of intellectual honesty.




Then why even bring it up? You are arguing with yourself at this point.

"what is stated in my dictionary will be stated there as long as that book exists, its not going to be rewritten by a random dude in the middle of the night "

Here you are again trying to say physical copies are superior right after saying physical copies can be flawed. You gotta pick a side.

That's a terrible example of what we are discussing.

Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 11 2022 11:38pm)

you speak of "intellectual honesty" what a crock of chit. this thread is about RNA world hypothesis retracted. your here just clogging up the thread with bullchit. you havent changed any thing. the chit paper RNA world hypothesis is retracted

Quote (Subwoofer @ Feb 11 2022 09:46pm)

You're free to go elsewhere, you continue to offer nothing but horrible responses that you don't understand yourself.

Quote (Snyft2 @ Feb 11 2022 09:26pm)

i didnt know it was being retracted either, i remember learning of it in school and never really believing it :wacko: it kinda felt like it had to "roll the dice" perfectly too many times at once so to say :unsure:

Quote (Subwoofer @ Feb 12 2022 06:34am)

Then why even bring it up? You are arguing with yourself at this point.

"what is stated in my dictionary will be stated there as long as that book exists, its not going to be rewritten by a random dude in the middle of the night "

Here you are again trying to say physical copies are superior right after saying physical copies can be flawed. You gotta pick a side.

That's a terrible example of what we are discussing.

Quote (Snyft2 @ 2 Oct 2021 16:21)

peer review is worthless shit due to politics infiltrating the academy :wacko: was much better before when the university personnel was a bunch of insanely high iq autists, at least you couldnt make them conform to the agenda no matter how hard you tried :wacko:

but, here are the peer reviews of dog humping being evidence of rape culture, main kampf written as intersectional feminism and a few more!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVk9a5Jcd1k

now, do keep in mind that some groups are harder to persuade to peer review trash than the others. for example, you cant make a paper saying "black holes are racist and should be renamed african american holes" or something in that range of idiocy, because physics still has mostly outlier high autists iq running the show. groups made of midwits, such as social sciences or medicine, or of neurotics and narcissists such as politics, law or art, are much easier to influence :wacko:

evolution in particular i believe in, because i can see it with my own eyes. now, i dont believe evolution is responsible for the "entire process" so to say and i do believe someone or something likely started it and maybe even guided it on occasions (i have enough evidence for my claims but i dont wanna bore people with that here), but evolution as survival of the fittest is pretty much observable in real time so i do believe in that :blush:

Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 26 2021 01:59am)

years ago but less than a decade ago i went on a quest seeking "the truth of it all" and i have discovered many things.

mankind literally poisons everything, even science.
many people like to hold up science as some kind of flawless institution of truth seeking men. That might be true for a few but over all that is a horse chit statement. Politics, money, ego permeates everything

Be careful what you decide to believe. Be suspicious of everything. You have enemies and they look to kill steal and destroy.

this topic is on RNA world hypothesis. It was the star of abiogenesis. Peer reviewed and held in the highest esteem. But
Was it ever really tested? observable, testable, repeatable? Or was it published because it was "pretty"?

In the end it did get tested.
and its been retracted.
but they dont go out of their way to update the things they have taught people to believe. Remember you have enemies that look to kill steal and destroy.

Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief



https://evolutionnews.org/2017/12/retractions-show-scientists-blinded-by-belief/

(i would like to recognize the honesty when he admits "blinded by belief". "evolution" and creation dialog can get very nasty.)

if you would like a deeper dive this guy does good talks
Blinded by Belief 1-13-2018 by Paul Giem - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx1HpkOjtEs