d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Lets Talk Science. More Specificaly "peer Review"
12311Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 3325Replies: 105Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 38,492
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Warn: 10%
#1
Sep 26 2021 03:59am


years ago but less than a decade ago i went on a quest seeking "the truth of it all" and i have discovered many things.

mankind literally poisons everything, even science.
many people like to hold up science as some kind of flawless institution of truth seeking men. That might be true for a few but over all that is a horse chit statement. Politics, money, ego permeates everything

Be careful what you decide to believe. Be suspicious of everything. You have enemies and they look to kill steal and destroy.

this topic is on RNA world hypothesis. It was the star of abiogenesis. Peer reviewed and held in the highest esteem. But
Was it ever really tested? observable, testable, repeatable? Or was it published because it was "pretty"?

In the end it did get tested.
and its been retracted.
but they dont go out of their way to update the things they have taught people to believe. Remember you have enemies that look to kill steal and destroy.

Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief
https://evolutionnews.org/2017/12/retractions-show-scientists-blinded-by-belief/

(i would like to recognize the honesty when he admits "blinded by belief". "evolution" and creation dialog can get very nasty.)

if you would like a deeper dive this guy does good talks
Blinded by Belief 1-13-2018 by Paul Giem - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx1HpkOjtEs
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#2
Sep 26 2021 02:13pm
Incredibly obvious you have no experience or training in science.

"Let's talk science" seems to actually mean "I repeat talking points I was spoon fed by creationists"
Member
Posts: 38,492
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Warn: 10%
#3
Sep 26 2021 02:15pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 26 2021 01:13pm)
Incredibly obvious you have no experience or training in science.

"Let's talk science" seems to actually mean "I repeat talking points I was spoon fed by creationists"


IN YOUR FACE :)
Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief
https://evolutionnews.org/2017/12/retractions-show-scientists-blinded-by-belief/
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sep 26 2021
Gold: 0.00
#4
Oct 2 2021 08:27am
Actually, YES! We are feed by fake news and false researches. Because of what? Because of money!
Member
Posts: 10,599
Joined: Mar 23 2017
Gold: 12,797.00
Warn: 20%
#5
Oct 2 2021 03:21pm
peer review is worthless shit due to politics infiltrating the academy :wacko: was much better before when the university personnel was a bunch of insanely high iq autists, at least you couldnt make them conform to the agenda no matter how hard you tried :wacko:

but, here are the peer reviews of dog humping being evidence of rape culture, main kampf written as intersectional feminism and a few more!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVk9a5Jcd1k

now, do keep in mind that some groups are harder to persuade to peer review trash than the others. for example, you cant make a paper saying "black holes are racist and should be renamed african american holes" or something in that range of idiocy, because physics still has mostly outlier high autists iq running the show. groups made of midwits, such as social sciences or medicine, or of neurotics and narcissists such as politics, law or art, are much easier to influence :wacko:

evolution in particular i believe in, because i can see it with my own eyes. now, i dont believe evolution is responsible for the "entire process" so to say and i do believe someone or something likely started it and maybe even guided it on occasions (i have enough evidence for my claims but i dont wanna bore people with that here), but evolution as survival of the fittest is pretty much observable in real time so i do believe in that :blush:
Member
Posts: 10,599
Joined: Mar 23 2017
Gold: 12,797.00
Warn: 20%
#6
Oct 2 2021 03:41pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 26 2021 10:15pm)
IN YOUR FACE :)
Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief
https://evolutionnews.org/2017/12/retractions-show-scientists-blinded-by-belief/


everyone can be blinded by belief because everyone has a bias, so you are completely correct about this. also if someone says he "doesnt have a bias", it is one of the signs of a midwit (midwit being defined as a moderately high iq conformist that can parrot the narrative but cant deconstruct it, the "i fucking love science" people)

creationism actually makes a lot of sense once some bullshit is removed, and this is easily proven by removing the bias from scientists. this was done pretty much by accident when the "simulation theory" idea came up, that is, that we are in a simulation created by aliens or whatever. academics who were completely opposed to a god theory completely ate up shit about simulation theory, along with the midwits that follow them, just because it was "scientific", while in reality the evidence for either of those is the same of even favoring the first one :wacko:
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Apr 5 2011
Gold: 0.00
#7
Oct 2 2021 03:45pm
Quote (Snyft2 @ Oct 2 2021 11:21pm)
peer review is worthless shit due to politics infiltrating the academy :wacko: was much better before when the university personnel was a bunch of insanely high iq autists, at least you couldnt make them conform to the agenda no matter how hard you tried :wacko:

but, here are the peer reviews of dog humping being evidence of rape culture, main kampf written as intersectional feminism and a few more!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVk9a5Jcd1k

now, do keep in mind that some groups are harder to persuade to peer review trash than the others. for example, you cant make a paper saying "black holes are racist and should be renamed african american holes" or something in that range of idiocy, because physics still has mostly outlier high autists iq running the show. groups made of midwits, such as social sciences or medicine, or of neurotics and narcissists such as politics, law or art, are much easier to influence :wacko:

evolution in particular i believe in, because i can see it with my own eyes. now, i dont believe evolution is responsible for the "entire process" so to say and i do believe someone or something likely started it and maybe even guided it on occasions (i have enough evidence for my claims but i dont wanna bore people with that here), but evolution as survival of the fittest is pretty much observable in real time so i do believe in that :blush:


I don’t understand a word!
Member
Posts: 10,599
Joined: Mar 23 2017
Gold: 12,797.00
Warn: 20%
#8
Oct 2 2021 03:49pm
Quote (Rouv @ Oct 2 2021 11:45pm)
I don’t understand a word!


hello there :blush: !
Member
Posts: 38,492
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Warn: 10%
#9
Dec 9 2021 10:04am
something to consider?

Has science become unscientific?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uj2en63u8VZ5/
Member
Posts: 10,599
Joined: Mar 23 2017
Gold: 12,797.00
Warn: 20%
#10
Dec 9 2021 01:52pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 9 2021 05:04pm)
something to consider?

Has science become unscientific?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uj2en63u8VZ5/


that annoys me as well. a few days ago a guy that worked in a covid hospital said something like "we see a lot of vaccinated people here in the ward. you know what we dont see? those who already had corona. there is a massive difference between the quality of those immunities", and people started raging WHERE IS THE LINK FOR THAT
he was like "umm i worked there for a year..." but that just made them even more mad :wacko:

personally if someone says "whats the link/study on that" instead of "whats your experience with that", i take it as a red flag :wacko:
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12311Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2024 d2jsp  Contact