your thinking is only about making excuses. never offering any kind of reasoned argument why 'atheism is reasonable.


the curtain rises on 'atheism. the story stars with a man called darwin. to darwn "evolution" was only an idea. he never committed it to a belief. i found him to be a reasonable thinker. it was the clowns that came after his when "evolution became 'fact 'fact ''fact.
a sample of darwins thinking
Darwin’s Horrid Doubt: Why Monkey Brains Troubled the Great Man of Science
Darwin’s Doubt
https://reasons.org/explore/publications/nrtb-e-zine/darwin-s-doubt

What do you mean "why atheism is reasonable"? Rejecting an evidentially unsupported claim is always reasonable.
Not believing in god, gods or godlike beings is the ONLY reasonable stance there is. Everything else is just baseless guessing.

Evolution has nothing to do with the god claim. Science has nothing to do with the god claim. Its all unrelated. The sooner you understand that, the better (for you).

This post was edited by Saurod on Oct 20 2024 11:07am

the simplest question. where did it all come from. in particular were did living systems (life) come from. in your head shaking excuses you try to play it off that these question dont mean anything.

"evolution has everything to do with the creator God claim. it is meant as an alterative explanation to special creation. 'atheists desperately cling to it. well except for you, you cling to "i dont need no explanation (non-science/knowledge) nu-huh "
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so darwin started all of it. then the clown show showed up to "prove" it all
HISTORY OF EVOLUTIONARY FRAUD
1. i would start the story with Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
ernst haeckel forges some drawings claiming 'evolution can be seen in the developing embryo. he was soon exposed as a fraud and had to resign from the university he worked at.
an article on Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
ERNST HAECKEL EMBRYO DRAWING A FRAUD– STILL USED IN TEXTBOOKS
https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/biological/ernst-haeckel-embryo-drawing-a-fraud-still-used-in-textbooks/
Lessons Learned from Haeckel and His Drawings: We Shouldn’t Always Believe What the “Leading Experts” Tell Us about Evolution
https://evolutionnews.org/2007/06/lessons_learned_from_haeckel_a/

Revisiting Those Pesky Embryo Drawings | Evolution News
evolutionnews.org › Science › Evolution
Jun 17, 2010 - ... century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks! Gould ...
excerpt
"do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

This post was edited by TiStuff on Oct 21 2024 07:45am

I dont know if you can understand, but god and evolution could easily co-exist. How could evolution, being a natural thing, be the opposite of god?

then why do 'atheist 'scientists push 'evolution so hard? even commit fraud for it?

EVOLUTIONARY FRAUD
1. Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
2. piltdown man
piltdown man 1912 40 year fraud (missing link)
piltdown man is probably the most famous fraud of them all
piltdown man was a fraud that consisted of a human skull and orangutan jaw. the gate keepers (atheists) had it protected from any kind of inquiry and was theeee proof we came from 'monkeys for 40years
after the huxters died off, only then was testing allowed.
Piltdown Man - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
the huxters

Group portrait of the Piltdown skull being examined. Back row (from left): F. O. Barlow, G. Elliot Smith, Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith Woodward. Front row: A. S. Underwood, Arthur Keith, W. P. Pycraft, and Ray Lankester. The portrait on the wall is of Charles Darwin. Painting by John Cooke, 1915.

This post was edited by TiStuff on Oct 23 2024 05:58pm

I dont know and I dont care, dude. Atheists arent a church, people speak for themselves, not on behalf of a group. I dont believe the religion bullshit. Not a bit. Thats it. For me, science and evolution are completely unrelated to the extremely unscientific topic that religion is.

This post was edited by Saurod on Oct 25 2024 01:17pm

you have belief that is merely faith based. once you realize that you will become aware that you just might be the biggest religious nutter of them all

all this scientific fraud is all brought to us by 'atheists no other group of people has ever been this bad or criminal at science. do you really believe 'atheism is rational?
EVOLUTIONARY FRAUD
1. Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
2. piltdown man

today we do number 3. nebraska man
i wouldnt call this one a fraud though more like just bad science, over zealous i suppose?
the story shows what atheists can get away with. all based on a tooth a complete monkey man was created and published in science magazine
1922 after more digging it was found to be a pigs tooth and was retracted in 1927. for 5 years though it was "proof"
atheists get laughed at over that one a pig made a monkey out of a man

Which believe do you mean? I dont have a belief. Elaborate please.

then your agnostic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EVOLUTIONARY FRAUD
1. Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
2. piltdown man
3. nebraska man

this next one is whale 'evolution
4. whale evolution
Whale evolution- A skeleton was found, missing all 4 legs and tail so the "skeptic" scientist drew in flippers and a fluke and said, proof of whale evolution. Later they found full skeleton and had to get out the eraser.( A criminal use of creative licensing by a empirical thinker?)
what we are going to find out? the absence of evidence seems to be the best evidence? just make up stuff to fill in the blank. they excuse it by calling it "inference"

well thats to bad. more youtube censorship. maybe i can find another copy? this actually happens a lot. i remember one time i posted a youtube vid then had the urge to check it again. when i went back to check it again it was moved to private. is it AI shadow banning?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Nov 5 2024 05:58am

Yes, I am agnostic. Also an atheist. Those arent mutually exclusive.

An atheist doesnt believe in a god, an agnostic is someone who doesnt believe its possible to know for sure if a god exists or not. Both is true for me. I am an agnostic atheist.

This post was edited by Saurod on Nov 6 2024 02:17am