Quote (Snyft2 @ Dec 9 2022 05:19pm)
well you did mention it as a theory, which is why i assumed you thought it was a working theory :unsure: sorry about that, my bad :wacko:
as for the other things, yeah it can kinda be tested :blush: ! im not gonna bother much explaining everything to you because you do seem a bit...disagreeable with the entire idea, but i can try to tell you what i think ur doing wrong and what has/can be tested :unsure: !
so what you are doing wrong: you think atheism is more logical. its not. the reason atheism superficially sounds like a reasonable theory is because the idea of a god sounds counterintuitive to many people. and i mean it really does! on the other hand, no god does sound way more intuitive. but you see, in science you cant just say a theory is shit, you need to give a better one. you cant just say "god doesnt exist" and leave the room, oh noo. due to the fine tuning argument you need to actually give a working theory that competes, and the only working one is multiverse theory. now that one doesnt sound intuitive at all, and you as an atheist believe in it with zero proof. multiverse theory is your religion one might say!
about the evidence we have so far: multiple universe theory has no evidence. and no, schrodingers cat is no evidence. if someone tells you schodingers cat is proof of multiverse theory, what you should do is tell him to stop watching kurzgesagt/arvin ash/whatever bullshit, bill gates funded, pseudoscience youtube channel hes watching and lower the soy intake :mellow: also its not a "prediction of inflation theory", ive heard that one as well. on the other hand, creator theory has some evidence. nde appearance is highly statistically relevant evidence, although anecdotal one. there is really no evolutionary explanation for it, and if you want, i can explain why in detail. the only possibility is that everyone with ndes lied, as there are lies that "chain" so to say. still, its some evidence. other evidence is that thought can affect quantum interactions, as you can see in the works of dean radin and a few others. again, if needed, i can explain why his data is scientifically extremely valuable and unlikely to be fake. also its falsifiable so theres that
as for the testing you can do yourself, prayer is a testable thing, although that one you have to do yourself. "science" has a hard agenda against religion (for which, again, i can explain the reasons behind if needed), so peer reviewed studies are useless. but its easy to test and i encourage you to try it :blush:
lol trying to reason with a ear wiggler.
Proverbs 26:4-5 KJV