d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Ladder Slasher > LS Character Builds > Comprehensive Prof Gain Guide.
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,183
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 20,826.51
Dec 8 2020 09:57pm
Quote (Bigheaded @ Dec 9 2020 04:35pm)
so in both cases you have shown a chance significantly lower than 50%.
One being 25% and the other 20%



As i said i checked successful attacks:
Results for 500 hits:
First 500: Club prof 11, mob level 12->17. Number of 0 hits ~15. Club prof changed from 5816 to 5918, so roughly 20%. I had 1x azapnid split, which is 8 wasted actions and i think i had some bad luck with 2x goocidics.
Second 500: Club prof 11, mob level 17->22. Number of 0 hits ~3.Club prof changed from 5918 to 6018, so exactly 20%. This was just a few goocidics hits from 2 spawns as i target them first, if it goes immune, kill everything else.


Now you've proven me right that the chance is significantly lower than 50% Do the test more times, you'll notice it consistently be around 1 in 5 melee actions. Even when counting "successful hit checks". Not sure where you got that terminology, would have rather 0 damage hits but whatever floats your boat.

I told you to specifically count just the melee hits to your weapon prof.
Healing "may" have a better rate, More tests would be necessary to know, your sample size of 15 is much too small, i'd need at least 500. Will possibly do the test myself.
It may also give you prof faster if it's a lower level, however i don't believe this is the case.



by who and what is the evidence? We've both done tests and it comes out 20-25%. So either we're amazingly unlucky and need to increase our sample size to 10,000 or the guy who mentioned that was trolling you.
I'm telling you right now its basically impossible for 1000 hits at a 50% chance to come out as low as 20%

If you STILL think it is 50% increase your own sample size rather than beating your face into a wall with your arguments, this is completely un-necessary.


Correct the following sentence:
An (1) Action is singular with A (1) Successful hit check vs A (1) Monster, can result in either 0 prof point(s) or 1 prof point = 50/50.


Google Random Generation/Generator Platform (something like that)
Member
Posts: 12,396
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 15,132.59
Dec 8 2020 10:01pm
Quote (izParagonzi @ Dec 9 2020 03:57am)
Correct the following sentence:
An (1) Action is singular with A (1) Successful hit check vs A (1) Monster, can result in either 0 prof point(s) or 1 prof point = 50/50.


Google Random Generation/Generator Platform (something like that)


Get yourself a pingpong ball and a jar. Stand 2 meters away and throw the ping pong ball into the jar.

There are 2 results:
Ping pong ball ends up in jar
Ping pong ball misses the jar

Apparently this is a 50/50 chance.

Do this test for me.

Lets also do it where you stand 2 miles away from the jar, i want you to throw that ping pong ball 2 entire miles
There are 2 results
Ping pong ball ends up in jar
Ping pong ball misses the jar

Also a 50/50 chance
Member
Posts: 15,536
Joined: Feb 4 2010
Gold: 1,572.81
Dec 8 2020 10:01pm
:mellow:
Member
Posts: 12,396
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 15,132.59
Dec 8 2020 10:13pm
Quote (izParagonzi @ Dec 9 2020 03:57am)
Correct the following sentence:
An (1) Action is singular with A (1) Successful hit check vs A (1) Monster, can result in either 0 prof point(s) or 1 prof point = 50/50.


Google Random Generation/Generator Platform (something like that)


1 other point then, do you get critical hits 50% of the time?
An (1) Action is singular with A (1) Successful hit check vs A (1) Monster, can result in either 0 critical hit or 1 critical hit = 50/50.
Member
Posts: 40,183
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 20,826.51
Dec 8 2020 10:18pm
Quote (Bigheaded @ Dec 9 2020 05:01pm)
Get yourself a pingpong ball and a jar. Stand 2 meters away and throw the ping pong ball into the jar.

There are 2 results:
Ping pong ball ends up in jar
Ping pong ball misses the jar

Chance increases based on the accuracy of the person throwing the pingpong ball

Apparently this is a 50/50 chance.

Do this test for me.

Lets also do it where you stand 2 miles away from the jar, i want you to throw that ping pong ball 2 entire miles
There are 2 results
Ping pong ball ends up in jar
Ping pong ball misses the jar

Depends on the throwers ability to throw that distance and wind factor (unless you are doing this in a large Factory)

Also a 50/50 chance


The difference in the last one, is that it is more like 0% chance because no one can throw a pingpong ball that distance... get real... you know my statement is correct... get over yourself... at least I stated that your calculations are NOT wrong.

Actually wish I remembered where a the guy proved that he could flip 2 coins, 10 times in a row and have them land on heads each time... took him substantial amount of time, but he successfully done it.

Quote (Bigheaded @ Dec 9 2020 05:13pm)
1 other point then, do you get critical hits 50% of the time?
An (1) Action is singular with A (1) Successful hit check vs A (1) Monster, can result in either 0 critical hit or 1 critical hit = 50/50.


Depends if you have the correct ratio numbers to have a 50/50 chance

This post was edited by izParagonzi on Dec 8 2020 10:20pm
Member
Posts: 12,396
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 15,132.59
Dec 8 2020 10:33pm
Quote (izParagonzi @ Dec 9 2020 04:18am)
The difference in the last one, is that it is more like 0% chance because no one can throw a pingpong ball that distance....


This is the entire point i'm trying to get across. Not all things with two outcomes are 50/50 chances.
I am telling you with 100% certainty that critical strike and proficiency are not 50/50 chances.
The Proficiency is more like a dice. Where if you roll a 6 you get +1. If you roll 1,2,3,4 or 5 then you do not.
Critical strike is closer to a 5% chance or lower. More like rolling the dice twice and getting a 6 both times = you got a critical strike. Or rolling a single 20 sided dice.


I am telling you that you are wrong and have given proof that you are wrong, I have accepted parts of your arguments when I do not have enough evidence such as:
Healing "may" have a better rate, More tests would be necessary to know, your sample size of 15 is much too small, i'd need at least 500. Will possibly do the test myself.

I've not said you are wrong here and suggested the best way to know for certain is to produce a sample size large enough to remove all outcomes.


Can the guy who could flip 2 coin and get them to land heads do that 1000 times in a row? or 10,000 times in a row? Can you do it?
Sample sizes are able to give a very good idea of probabilities or the chance of something happening.
If we had a sample size of 1 million and 210,000 of them came out with +1 prof, then i'd argue the chance was 21% instead of 20%.


The first step to ending this nonsense topic is for you to accept that the proficiency is not a 50/50 chance so we can move on with our lives.
Member
Posts: 40,183
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 20,826.51
Dec 8 2020 10:46pm
Quote (Bigheaded @ Dec 9 2020 05:33pm)
This is the entire point i'm trying to get across. Not all things with two outcomes are 50/50 chances.
I am telling you with 100% certainty that critical strike and proficiency are not 50/50 chances.
The Proficiency is more like a dice. Where if you roll a 6 you get +1. If you roll 1,2,3,4 or 5 then you do not.
Critical strike is closer to a 5% chance or lower. More like rolling the dice twice and getting a 6 both times = you got a critical strike. Or rolling a single 20 sided dice.


I am telling you that you are wrong and have given proof that you are wrong, I have accepted parts of your arguments when I do not have enough evidence such as:
Healing "may" have a better rate, More tests would be necessary to know, your sample size of 15 is much too small, i'd need at least 500. Will possibly do the test myself.

I've not said you are wrong here and suggested the best way to know for certain is to produce a sample size large enough to remove all outcomes.


Can the guy who could flip 2 coin and get them to land heads do that 1000 times in a row? or 10,000 times in a row? Can you do it?
Sample sizes are able to give a very good idea of probabilities or the chance of something happening.
If we had a sample size of 1 million and 210,000 of them came out with +1 prof, then i'd argue the chance was 21% instead of 20%.


The first step to ending this nonsense topic is for you to accept that the proficiency is not a 50/50 chance so we can move on with our lives.


It is more like a COIN... heads or tails, the difference is that a COIN has a chance to land on its' EDGE, so with your Dice example, you would include the EDGE(s) (think 12).

The difference with Proficiency points is, there isn't an EDGE for it to land on, nor is there a 1/6 chance (excl edges) like a dice to select a different number.

Remember singular: 1 Action + Successful Hit Check = either 0 or 1 prof point... doesn't include 10k actions, you are calculating the AVERAGE CHANCE over the 10k actions.

You can NOT gain more than 1 prof point for 1 Successful Hit Check Action vs 1 Mob : it is either 0 or 1... end of story... you are lost on dice scenario.

EDIT: With a Multi Action (still 1) vs 9 wave increases because of the AMOUNT of Successful Hit checks by 8 (my bad), but in that 1 action, you can still get a 0 even if all 9 die in that hit by (Successful Hit check on all)

This post was edited by izParagonzi on Dec 8 2020 10:52pm
Member
Posts: 12,396
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 15,132.59
Dec 8 2020 10:52pm
Quote (izParagonzi @ Dec 9 2020 04:46am)
you are calculating the AVERAGE CHANCE over the 10k actions.

You can NOT gain more than 1 prof point for 1 Successful Hit Check Action vs 1 Mob : it is either 0 or 1... end of story... you are lost on dice scenario.


Yes i'm calculating average chance.

what the fack are you calculating? how much nonsense you can spam in this thread before it gets closed?
Member
Posts: 40,183
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 20,826.51
Dec 8 2020 10:59pm
Quote (Bigheaded @ Dec 9 2020 05:52pm)
Yes i'm calculating average chance.

what the fack are you calculating? how much nonsense you can spam in this thread before it gets closed?


Funny... you say I am wrong, yet you don't acknowledge that I was correct all along. Shit, I can say that your average is wrong because it is random, the % chance can change drastically, this is what I tested just with Heals before and only doing 10 actions at a time:

1326 start / 1333 = 7/10 create new game
1333 start / 1335 = 2/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game

Wow... that sucks 9/60 ... is it worth continueing?

Oh... this should not be closed because it is related to the topic and we are not being abusive with each other.
Member
Posts: 12,396
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 15,132.59
Dec 8 2020 11:14pm
Quote (izParagonzi @ Dec 9 2020 04:59am)
Funny... you say I am wrong, yet you don't acknowledge that I was correct all along. Shit, I can say that your average is wrong because it is random, the % chance can change drastically, this is what I tested just with Heals before and only doing 10 actions at a time:

1326 start / 1333 = 7/10 create new game
1333 start / 1335 = 2/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game
1335 start / 1335 = 0/10 create new game

Wow... that sucks 9/60 ... is it worth continueing?

Oh... this should not be closed because it is related to the topic and we are not being abusive with each other.


First of all that looks like 50 attempts not 60.

I can say you're correct for this statement:
Quote
Subject Matter:
A single Attack/Heal ACTION = 0-1 Prof Point. Max Cap 10 per Wave excl Event Mod.


someone else confirmed this who i'd trust, however Paul may have just changed the number so i will check it's still the case if i decide to rewrite this "comprehensive prof guide"

I am completely willing to accept you're correct on things which are right.
In fact i can also accept you suggesting my 20% is "inaccurate" which is correct because the sample size isn't large enough. It's basically impossible for me to prove whether its a 20% chance to gain a prof or a 20.1% chance to gain a prof if i am told it's one or the other. The size of the sample needed to give you a pretty reasonable idea would be around 10 million and even then you could still call that inaccurate.

However, when proving that the chance of prof is Not 50% and given a sample size of 2500 which comes out extremely close to 20%, I can say with 100% certainty there's enough evidence to say it's not a 50% chance.
I've already done my sample size of 2500, and getting more like 21% I suspect this is simply randomness though.


Lets try the old "balls in a bag" if you dislike dice.
We have a non see through bag with 5 balls in, 4 of them are red, 1 is blue.
You put your hand in and pull out 1 ball without looking
Option 1: A red ball
Option 2: A blue ball
Is this a 50/50 chance?

This post was edited by Bigheaded on Dec 8 2020 11:15pm
Go Back To LS Character Builds Topic List
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll