d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > Solution To Early Bumps
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 61,717
Joined: Oct 13 2006
Gold: 550.00
Sep 12 2022 03:06pm
Quote (Superman @ Sep 12 2022 05:02pm)
No.

1: They'll just make another topic.
2: I find it necessary to early bump on occasion and I'm willing to accept responsibility for it. For example, if I found a Ber rune on day 2 of ladder and my topic starts on page 7 with 0 views because there's 2000 people posting. I may early bump it once or twice because waiting 4 hours means it becomes worth 50% less FG. I do try my best to look and search for ISO Ber topics first.
3: If somebody is early bumping and it bothers you that much, collect about 10 topics of them early bumping and send a PM to a TA/TM. In my experience, it results in 10% about 9 out of 10 times. Trade hijacking used to be an instant 10% if I PM'd a TM/TA.


i dont even know where to start so
thanks for your vote!
Member
Posts: 61,717
Joined: Oct 13 2006
Gold: 550.00
Sep 15 2022 04:00pm
Lets make this happen
Member
Posts: 61,717
Joined: Oct 13 2006
Gold: 550.00
Sep 28 2022 09:43am
Bump
Member
Posts: 8,809
Joined: Oct 16 2006
Gold: 10.00
Sep 29 2022 04:16am
Thinking about this I was wondering whether there may be scenarios where, let's say in a trade topic, there's actually substantial new information that rather belongs into a regular post than into an edit of the first post.

Example: I'm selling an item in post 1, set a bin, someone bins it in post 30, to which I reply in post 31. But then he never shows up, or says in a PM that he's no longer interested in trading.

Now I could just edit my first post, saying it's still available, which might cause some confusion (and would perhaps require people to compare the time of my editing to the time of posts 30 or 31).
Of course I could just wait and put the info into a regular bump, which means 4 hours will pass where people must think the item is no longer available.
Making an early clarification in another post is a violation of the early bump rule, but is the rule strictly enforced in that scenario?

Or what if I'm refusing someone's offer at first, but 1 hour later decide it's actually good and I want to trade? For transparency reasons I may not be willing to move the negotiations to my PMs but keep them visible for everyone.

I'm torn between voting yes or no on this. Might attach a vote later though!
Member
Posts: 69,912
Joined: Mar 18 2007
Gold: 978.02
Trader: Mediator
Sep 29 2022 05:29am
I think this would be difficult since replying to others posts with C/O or T4T are considered early bumps these days.

Will vote yes because I think if something could be implemented, it would be beneficial.
Member
Posts: 14,547
Joined: Jun 15 2018
Gold: 43,267.66
Sep 29 2022 07:22am
prepare to get obliterated if this gets implemented by bm traders

joking aside I vote yes
Member
Posts: 72,809
Joined: Apr 11 2007
Gold: 3.00
Trader: Trusted
Sep 29 2022 09:37am
How about combine their post with the last one if it falls under such conditions?
This would allow the user to reply with what they want.

This post was edited by Djsem on Sep 29 2022 09:38am
Member
Posts: 8,809
Joined: Oct 16 2006
Gold: 10.00
Sep 29 2022 10:15am
Quote (Djsem @ 29 Sep 2022 17:37)
How about combine their post with the last one if it falls under such conditions?
This would allow the user to reply with what they want.



Hey, are you referring to my post earlier? If so, what do you mean by "combine their post"? Something different than enabling longer editing periods?

This post was edited by TheOnlyDenny on Sep 29 2022 10:15am
Member
Posts: 72,809
Joined: Apr 11 2007
Gold: 3.00
Trader: Trusted
Sep 29 2022 04:46pm
Quote (TheOnlyDenny @ 29 Sep 2022 12:15)
Hey, are you referring to my post earlier? If so, what do you mean by "combine their post"? Something different than enabling longer editing periods?


Quote (TheOnlyDenny @ 29 Sep 2022 06:16)
Thinking about this I was wondering whether there may be scenarios where, let's say in a trade topic, there's actually substantial new information that rather belongs into a regular post than into an edit of the first post.

Example: I'm selling an item in post 1, set a bin, someone bins it in post 30, to which I reply in post 31. But then he never shows up, or says in a PM that he's no longer interested in trading.

Now I could just edit my first post, saying it's still available, which might cause some confusion (and would perhaps require people to compare the time of my editing to the time of posts 30 or 31).
Of course I could just wait and put the info into a regular bump, which means 4 hours will pass where people must think the item is no longer available.
Making an early clarification in another post is a violation of the early bump rule, but is the rule strictly enforced in that scenario?

Or what if I'm refusing someone's offer at first, but 1 hour later decide it's actually good and I want to trade? For transparency reasons I may not be willing to move the negotiations to my PMs but keep them visible for everyone.

I'm torn between voting yes or no on this. Might attach a vote later though!


I was suggesting for something like this, in the event the OP posts a reply under the 4 hour bump.




This post was edited by Djsem on Sep 29 2022 04:46pm
Member
Posts: 8,809
Joined: Oct 16 2006
Gold: 10.00
Sep 29 2022 04:58pm
Quote (Djsem @ 30 Sep 2022 00:46)
I was suggesting for something like this, in the event the OP posts a reply under the 4 hour bump.


https://i.imgur.com/SrStlGm.png



That looks pretty cool tbh. I don‘t know whether it‘s feasible though. This appears like a pretty major change compared to what op is suggesting.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll