d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Vancouver Canucks Fan Thread > We're All Canucks
Prev1696697698699700894Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 39,227
Joined: Mar 1 2006
Gold: 12,140.00
Oct 10 2020 10:10pm
Quote (Hizkuntza @ Oct 10 2020 07:22pm)
Right now the blue line is hilariously bad. We literally have no RHD who can play either tough minutes or log a lot of ice time without fucking up. Myers is what he is, he's worth half his cap hit and will never be a legit workhorse. We have a lot of tape on Chatfield and Rathbone and these guys simply can't fill the gaping void left even if they take major steps forward. Maybe Juolevi can do his part, but even thats a long shot. Oh, and Edler is old and his wheels can fall off any time. If Benning makes no moves we will, disgustingly, have the worst blueline in the league despite having the best young defenseman.

And I don't buy that we're going to necessarily be better in the long run even if we semi tank the next two seasons. While ofc Petey and Hughes are young, Horvat, Boeser and Miller are all in their prime right now and are light on the cap relative to their contributions. We will probably be squeezed out from 1-2 of them soon after Hughes and Petey reup and that's where we pray to the almighty that Podz and Hoglander can contribute while they're on their ELCs. And we have absolutely no one who projects as Top 4 Dmen, specially on the right. Juolevi can maybe redeem himself and Rafferty pans out, but they're long shots. Either we get lottery picks to solve that issue or we're fucked.

I would've preferred to keep Marky and trade Demko, but Benning at least handled the goalie situation in an acceptable way. Maybe you can argue that we couldn't afford to keep Tanev. And there are no excuses for hardballing Stecher out of town. Either way, these decisions were forced because Benning gave way too much money to veterans looking for retirement contracts. As a result, we lost loyal players who just wanted to be paid their worth and stay in town. Not only our defense looks fucked right now, but the situation in the locker room - watching character guys get penny pinched while underperforming veterans stack cash - is probably worse right now.

Yeah I know I'm a negative Nancy, but this was miles and miles coming. Benning is a fucking idiot who doesn't know he's a fucking idiot and that has never changed.


It's not negative, it's spot on.

Because of the bad contracts we've talked about a million times, the timeline is being pushed back a 1 year to 2.

We no longer can hope to capitalize on the EP and Hughes ELC instead the Hog and Pod ELCs, if they even pan out.

And yeah, unless one of our average D prospects surprisingly breaks out, we're fucked when it comes to legit top-4 D. Who knows what Edler looks likes in 2 years and I don't know if Myers is a top-4 D-man unless the 3 guys in front of him are REALLY good.

All we can hope is some good D-men fall into our laps in one of the next two UFA summers, maybe like the Orpik/Niskanen thing for the Caps (moreso Niskaken, but still).

This post was edited by LuLer on Oct 10 2020 10:10pm
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
Oct 10 2020 10:59pm
Quote (LuLer @ Oct 10 2020 11:10pm)
It's not negative, it's spot on.

Because of the bad contracts we've talked about a million times, the timeline is being pushed back a 1 year to 2.

We no longer can hope to capitalize on the EP and Hughes ELC instead the Hog and Pod ELCs, if they even pan out.

And yeah, unless one of our average D prospects surprisingly breaks out, we're fucked when it comes to legit top-4 D. Who knows what Edler looks likes in 2 years and I don't know if Myers is a top-4 D-man unless the 3 guys in front of him are REALLY good.

All we can hope is some good D-men fall into our laps in one of the next two UFA summers, maybe like the Orpik/Niskanen thing for the Caps (moreso Niskaken, but still).


As of now the blues have oodles of nhl caliber dmen. I could see dunn being available for the right price, and if you're looking cheaper, gunnarson.
Member
Posts: 6,218
Joined: Sep 13 2016
Gold: 2,657.74
Oct 12 2020 12:22pm
Toffoli gone was a sure thing but since we lost all other UFAs losing him stings too. Even if the cap grew there was 0 chance he could've been retained.

still blows my mind he walks, Stecher got hardballed out of town and yet Benning bothered to give Virtanen a QO. some disgustingly bad asset prioritization.

This post was edited by Hizkuntza on Oct 12 2020 12:26pm
Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Oct 12 2020 12:29pm
Quote (696969696969696969696969696969 @ 10 Oct 2020 21:59)
As of now the blues have oodles of nhl caliber dmen. I could see dunn being available for the right price, and if you're looking cheaper, gunnarson.


Idk man, I don't think horvat needs to practice anymore of his toe drags on dunn

I mean I guess there's still an option to bring tryamkin back after KHL ends in Feb. He'd at least be a stecher replacement, if not better. Doing fairly well there so far. Green would have no choice but to play him or Benn on their offhand since they both can play it, assuming Benning doesnt find a top 4d. Rumor is he's looking to trade, or still looking for a top 4.

This post was edited by Secksii on Oct 12 2020 12:40pm
Member
Posts: 28,247
Joined: May 27 2009
Gold: 18,101.00
Oct 12 2020 01:12pm
knew it was likely we would lose Toffoli.

Still pissed about it now that it has been confirmed.

He had natural chemistry in the top 6. The ability was there to keep up both in terms of hockey IQ and ability. He will be missed.


Ideally Virtanen would be the replacement but as harsh as it is to say I think he is just too dumb to be able to have full utility with the high IQ players.

Just drives me nuts because all of the other tools are there.
Member
Posts: 6,218
Joined: Sep 13 2016
Gold: 2,657.74
Oct 12 2020 06:47pm
Nate Schmidt to the Canucks for a 3rd

ok on the surface it looks fine, Knights are cap fucked so we acquire a very good top 4 dman for cheap. He can also play either side so we can either load up the top pairing or spread the talent around. From a personnel fit it seems like Benning did the best he could without giving up much.

But Schmidt makes $6M until 2024-25 and has an NMC. So we let all our guys walk because theoretically we can't afford a penny more, but now once the RFA crunch comes next season we're so less flexible. in isolation it makes sense because Schmidt can simply take Edler's spot, but for next season we HAVE to dump at least two of the shitty contracts (or Eriksson) to make something work. and it will arguably be the worst time in cap history to dump players.

I want to not shit on Benning here but I'm pretty sure this move completely contradicts the excuse for letting everyone else walk. Are we any better with Schmidt alone, than we were when if we retained Toffoli and Stecher (even assuming Tanev and Marky were gone for good)? The NMC really fucks us if we need to make a move for the same reason as the Knights.

oh yeah, and imagine a world where we don't sign Myers and retain both Tanev and Stecher instead:

Hughes-Schmidt
Edler-Tanev
Juolevi/Benn/Fantenberg-Stecher

Suddenly our back end looks pretty damn decent.

yeah and don't tell me about the scenario where we don't sign a billion scrub forwards.

This post was edited by Hizkuntza on Oct 12 2020 07:04pm
Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Oct 12 2020 07:44pm
I disagree, we got a solid top 4 dman for only a 3rd. It was no surprise the Canucks needed their backend revamped and this is a step in the right direction. He's not a place holder, will be a core easily with the shitty Canucks d. Now there's 2 pairs that can bring out the puck out of their zone, Hughes-myers and edler-Schmidt. Although Schmidt seems much better on his original lhd position. Another ofd, except actually reliable defensively is a huge upgrade from tanev.

Edlers contract will be up after this season, and I can see him sign cheap 1 year deals or short term cap friendly deals. Schmidt doesn't have nmc, he has mNTC. I don't think that matters, 6m friendly cap for a dman of his calibre. Looks like green has no option but to play Schmidt and/or Benn on their offhand due to lack of depth on the rightside.

I personally think it's a huge upgrade over toffoli+stecher.
The Canucks struggled immensely in the backend when Hughes was not on the ice, by having another player able to bring the puck out when Hughes isn't on the ice changes things. Its definitely a huge blow to lose toffoli, but the Canucks still managed to hold on when he was out with an injury. Although there's no question how much effective the Canucks pp1 became with him on the ice over boeser. Losing 3rd pair in stecher sucks too, but at least it gives a chance for a prospect to see some NHL ice time. If he wasn't a local boy, playing hard, I don't think I'd give much fucks tho. Even fatenberg can help the loss of stecher, if the Canucks could bring him back, but they will regress anyway, so I prefer we see what chatfield or Rafferty has. If they suck, next season priority after locking up Demko, Hughes, Petey would be finding depth pair for Benn and another 3rd pair.

Member
Posts: 28,247
Joined: May 27 2009
Gold: 18,101.00
Oct 12 2020 08:01pm
Would be curious to see advanced analytics on Schmidt.

From what I saw during the playoffs he was pretty solid.

He can play big minutes.

The question is does he fit into the core?

Well I think he is considerably better than Myers with the same salary. A year younger, but one year longer term.

Contract checks out if that is what the bar is.

Furthermore I think getting Schmidt alone significantly improves our trash tier defense. Realistically I think he brings 3-5 wins alone just based on how desperately we needed to improve the defense.


I will agree partially though..... This move will probably force the Canucks to move at least one bad contract which will cost additional picks or prospects.

So on the surface getting a top 4D with a reasonable contract for a 3rd looks good, the actual price will be higher in the end.


Overall my thoughts are mixed on this acquisition. Time will tell.

This post was edited by Killingyouall on Oct 12 2020 08:02pm
Member
Posts: 6,218
Joined: Sep 13 2016
Gold: 2,657.74
Oct 12 2020 10:15pm
Quote (Secksii @ Oct 12 2020 06:44pm)
I disagree, we got a solid top 4 dman for only a 3rd. It was no surprise the Canucks needed their backend revamped and this is a step in the right direction. He's not a place holder, will be a core easily with the shitty Canucks d. Now there's 2 pairs that can bring out the puck out of their zone, Hughes-myers and edler-Schmidt. Although Schmidt seems much better on his original lhd position. Another ofd, except actually reliable defensively is a huge upgrade from tanev.

Edlers contract will be up after this season, and I can see him sign cheap 1 year deals or short term cap friendly deals. Schmidt doesn't have nmc, he has mNTC. I don't think that matters, 6m friendly cap for a dman of his calibre. Looks like green has no option but to play Schmidt and/or Benn on their offhand due to lack of depth on the rightside.

I personally think it's a huge upgrade over toffoli+stecher.
The Canucks struggled immensely in the backend when Hughes was not on the ice, by having another player able to bring the puck out when Hughes isn't on the ice changes things. Its definitely a huge blow to lose toffoli, but the Canucks still managed to hold on when he was out with an injury. Although there's no question how much effective the Canucks pp1 became with him on the ice over boeser. Losing 3rd pair in stecher sucks too, but at least it gives a chance for a prospect to see some NHL ice time. If he wasn't a local boy, playing hard, I don't think I'd give much fucks tho. Even fatenberg can help the loss of stecher, if the Canucks could bring him back, but they will regress anyway, so I prefer we see what chatfield or Rafferty has. If they suck, next season priority after locking up Demko, Hughes, Petey would be finding depth pair for Benn and another 3rd pair.



What I would like to see done next is:

-Trade Virtanen for a plug-and-play sort of forward (another Pearson or like Chris Higgins, maybe a lower-profile player on ELC or cheap bridge)
-Sign Vatanen or Hamonic for 1-year
-Exhaust every GM in the league about our cap dumps to see if there are any takers without giving up a 1st+


I'm more warmed up to the Schmidt trade the more I think about it but Toffoli made the team substantially better. If we could find another "makes his teammates better" sort of forward to replace him that'd be huge. Otherwise even when healthy it's Virtanen or Eriksson in the Top 6 who are completely inept on one side of the rink. I don't think MacEwan is more than a bottom 6 grinder and Podz/Hoglander are probably not ready for that sort of burden.

Either way I don't think we'll have enough coming off the books to keep everyone next season without some dumps. Ferland being permanently LTIRetired would be a start but seems like he'll make every attempt to play again.



Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Oct 13 2020 01:34am
Quote (Killingyouall @ 12 Oct 2020 19:01)
Would be curious to see advanced analytics on Schmidt.

From what I saw during the playoffs he was pretty solid.

He can play big minutes.

The question is does he fit into the core?

Well I think he is considerably better than Myers with the same salary. A year younger, but one year longer term.

Contract checks out if that is what the bar is.

Furthermore I think getting Schmidt alone significantly improves our trash tier defense. Realistically I think he brings 3-5 wins alone just based on how desperately we needed to improve the defense.


I will agree partially though..... This move will probably force the Canucks to move at least one bad contract which will cost additional picks or prospects.

So on the surface getting a top 4D with a reasonable contract for a 3rd looks good, the actual price will be higher in the end.


Overall my thoughts are mixed on this acquisition. Time will tell.


His advanced stats comparable to OEL, more friendly term and caphit. He has insane zone exit like Hughes in the top 2% projectile. Which is perfect and something the Canucks desperately needed from other than Hughes. Now instead of fricken dumping it and making the forward chase, they got another reliable player to make a pass to the forwards instead.

His defensive part of the game took a hit last season because DeBoer played him against the other teams top lines far too much, he was among the 97th percentile of NHL defencemen this season in terms of how often he played against elite competition. Reason was that Theodore needed to be heavily sheltered. He also changed from LHD to RHD. However his defensive aspect of the game was still better than tanevs, which is damn promising. His PK is realllly good too

I think virtanen would be kept, based on arbitration cost. Benning will probably send Eriksson and bae down minors to save 2mil, and in worst case scenario buyout Sutter to fit virtanen, leivo and gaudette. Buying Sutter out would still clear up his cap by end of 22 when everything is off the books, of course it's more ideal if he can somehow give him away to some team for a 3rd to recoup, but seeing as how Benning just got Schmidt for a 3rd will probably make a gm be like dude come on bruh



It's pretty comical how Benning failed to acquire oel, barrie and keep tanev although it seemed like he had no intention to keep him long term. Yet, he acquired a player that has less caphit than oel, more defensively reliable than barrie and a much better puck mover than tanev rofl lucky much?

Also the 3rd is for the 2022 season, which still aligns with the plan the Canucks should be competing for that year




This post was edited by Secksii on Oct 13 2020 02:01am
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev1696697698699700894Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll