Quote (dragoneth @ 3 Feb 2023 08:37)
im comparing because there active players in the same league playing equally as good getting paid less
just seems really dumb to be like im putting up less points then that guy for my entire career but i want to get paid more then him because the cap went up
i get it you the teams the league they all go by the cap % but that's the whole fucking problem just because play A got 10% of the cap then why does shitter player B deserve the same money because that's the % for those types of players?
like it makes sense but at the same time it really doesn't what if they need to lower the cap? those contracts become way bigger %s but if they just based everybody on skill:money ratio that wouldn't matter as much because they wouldn't be paying a 70-80 point player the same as a 100+ point player just because the contract was signed a couple years later and that was his %
and thats a pretty fair point about viewership
They're not shittier player though...
Generational players like Crosby and Ovechkin are getting older, while the next upcoming stars like Mackinnon are getting better and reaching their prime ages. If mcdavid didn't take a discount when he signed the contract, and only cared about money he would still be the highest paid player despite signing his contract ages ago.
It would be more stupid for players not getting paid when cap goes up because that would cause a lockout lol. Can you imagine if players are being paid like back in the 90s and the caphit is 82m? Every team wouldnt have any cap problems, and be fighting to reach cap floor instead. They'll literally accuse teams of purposely making shit contract on a shit player to reach cap floor. Superstars will be paid 5 to 6m etc. That makes 0 sense.
The biggest issue is the average nhlers getting screwed cuz of the new upcoming youngsters and superstars. Back then, after elc, they get a decent bridge or term contracts, and after that they get to cash in their pay. Nowadays, right after elc teams have to massively overpay for their potential rather than what they did. Either lock em up or bridge with 1 year remaining as rfa with high qo. That's the problem.
Your logic is flawed because everyone can argue that they don't deserve their pay if their point totals are less than Draisaitl. It's not always about the points. It's about comparable players and what other things they provide to the team, such as being a centre? Winger? Lhd? RHD? Etc.
Also at the time, everyone thought Draisaitl was massively overpaid. So with your logic he shouldve signed a deal that's like 4 to 6m avv cuz he's worse than player A who earns 8+m. Now imagine all other players that are easily worth 6 to 8m deals but can't ask for more than 4m to 6m avv cuz Draisaitl has far more pts than they provide and it'd be "stupid" to ask for their price based on the caphit increase. If that's the case the league would be in shambles and players wouldn't be happy cuz they'll never make money playing the sport they love while owners take all the profits while the league is making more money than the past.