first graph probably shows the poorest showing for 2400, not a huge difference in 3dmark but it's there, last pic seems to show that mhz > timings when you're trying to compensate for a dc mem controller

This post was edited by DCSS on Jun 20 2017 03:46pm

This, $2 price difference.

LegitReviews is a junk website. We've know that for a while now.

In the 3DGuru benches, they underclocked the 3200Mhz to 2667Mhz and lower the timings. so like Linus said...it doesn't fucking matter. :/


http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_memory_and_tweaking_analysis_review,10.html

Right, crunch time. What will be the effect of faster clocked memory with games at 1920x1080, and sure I'll throw in 2560x1440 as well.Now for our AMD Ryzen reviews I have already made the default memory clock freqeuncy 2667 MHz, I am now considering to make 2933 MHz the new default baseline test frequency for memory in our reviews. And here is why:

This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 20 2017 03:49pm

I'm not really worried about the $2 price difference. I'm just trying to figure out if the higher number is better or not....

Also: Do these numbers have to match!? Because if so, I cannot go with the 3000 MHz

i dont even know how this is a debate

Ok. U keep using 1066 on ur pc then
Gl hf



Right... The f

This post was edited by Penguins0690 on Jun 20 2017 03:49pm

exactly, then obviously the 3000 is the better choice.

it'll be 2933, so 3000 will work.

Right, unless your ghot
And find everything
Via askjeeves

No, they don't. The SMART move is to buy what the RAM company has tested and verified to work.