Quote (MajinKaisa @ Oct 26 2010 03:15pm)

Hope you will save this thread and come back in a few years to see how silly everything you said here sounds.
Thank you.

Quote (Kisssofdeath @ Nov 1 2010 07:12pm)

Agreed 100% chance out of 100% chance to process x whereas x being 100% chance! 

Quote (MajinKaisa @ Oct 26 2010 11:15pm)

Hope you will save this thread and come back in a few years to see how silly everything you said here sounds.
Thank you.

Quote (MajinKaisa @ Nov 2 2010 01:38am)

why don't you
use a random number generator function to determine if a cb will proc, pick from 0 to 99, if number < %cb then successful check for cb Either < or = , not only smaller. The percentage will be 0-75=CB-T/76-100=NoCB-T
to the same thing for the range of physical damage except use the number as % of range of damage variation Average damage is just as reliable.
calculate cb damage accurately and add that to actual damage
iterate to next step until hp<=0
calculate time
have this calculated 10 or 20 or 100 times.

then when you have that done
post: min, max, mean, and std of the results Posting a Minimum and a Maximum result is equivalent to posting Average result.

so at that point you'll have reliable, believable results There is no reliability in determining boarder-line Chance triggers under the effect of "Random Number Generator". E.G- The generator has picked #1,#4,#5 for 30 consecutive times out of 100 numbers. The average is hence [1+4+5]/3 = 3.333. Any higher numbers will be disregarded simply because the generator, at this experiment, did not pick them at all (#2,#3,#6-#100). In terms of %CB, the proccing was always (1,4,5) <=75 , hence 100% CB.

and there still won't likely be a considerable difference or anyone who cares

Quote (Synonym @ 3 Nov 2010 06:46)

No.

Quote (MajinKaisa @ Nov 3 2010 11:49am)

what are you dumb?

Quote (od_yard @ 3 Nov 2010 12:09)

Dont worry synonym does the same thing to me too.

Quote (MajinKaisa @ Nov 3 2010 08:04pm)

by same thing you mean: posts a bunch of nonsense after you've posed a logical solution to his nonsensical theory-crafting?
sounds about right

the point being that synonym's model is what he believes to be a mathematical equivalent to how the game works. where he could have either done a much simpler mathematical average, or made a realistic model, but instead took a little of the first and mixed it with a little bit of the second and stirred it all up with a theory-crafter mixer, baked @j$p for 31,000 posts, with a ego-whipped topping.

its a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake ^^