I'm just curious, what is the procedure that mods use to determine whether or not to remove someone's warn? Is it a judgment thing, or is there some set standards for accepting/rejecting the request? I'm sure that my latest rejection was due solely to me getting suspended earlier for this post, but I'm not exactly sure WHY I was suspended for it. The reason was, of course, flaming, but I was just answering the OP's question.

This post was edited by Panic_Fails_at_Diablo on Jun 26 2011 02:36am

they look through all your posts between your last warn and the time you click request removal.

if they see you didn't learn a lesson, they extend it.

goes for all rules - so if you flamed somebody, then early bumped a month later, that can affect. but yeah, your suspension post was lulzy haha

This post was edited by Rws on Jun 26 2011 02:39am

For Warn you can use this :

The New Warning System

Warn Removal

So it's a judgment call. I'm not sure what the reasoning behind the latest rejection is, then. My latest warn was given for trade spamming(Probably deserved a couple of those), and "flaming." Neither of my "flaming" violations were actually flaming, though; they were just me fooling around with friends :/

/e Oop I can't type.

This post was edited by Panic_Fails_at_Diablo on Jun 26 2011 02:44am

Sorry, but those informations are private.

If you feel you shouldn't had been warned or rejected, please send a kind pm ONCE to one of the following:
hapycmpr
Lajo
lc3