Should be bm by the rules stated.

Just as mara bo should be ^^

Mara bo doesn’t bother me at all, if everyone can do it that’s the way to go because it’s way too hard to regulate and tell who’s doing it or not. I don’t feel like showing my inventory to people every game. The wisp makes a big difference and actually limits viable builds in the current meta.

Idk 11lr is more valuable then 1bo skill vs convviction ^^ also pain in the ass to swap them every single fight

Altho rules state only 1 piece of abs/maxres is allowed

they nerfed foh dmg ?

^^

I'm totally fine on wisp + 80 % lr be BM. Let me know people, I can do a quick, more specific update to a rule which has never been totally clear
on this regard

This post was edited by Tutelary on May 19 2022 02:02am

80max + wisp OR 85max was gm ever since and thats what the rules say imo, also in current pvp tournament rules of d2a (which are widely accepted and used) it is legit, so i see no reason to declare it bm

D2A rules or gm rules are for all vs all, 80/20 is aimed at dueling trapsins mostly. Here we have vt vs vt which is a different story. Wouldn't hurt to disallow wisp + max lr to allow more build variability to be honest

In the new meta with the recent changes I think a wisp is too much sorb. VC already got an incredible buff with the recent foh change, VC’s won’t really be getting foh’d at all while dueling a VT since we need a namelock now and that’s a huge risk when a VC is charging you. Before, we could spam foh when VC was off screen and do some damage which equalized things. Needing a namelock now requires us to wait till you are on screen, acquire a namelock, then foh. Vs a VC this is suicide. All the changes they made really fucked up vtpk.

The VC’s on the ladder currently wear fort anyways don’t they?

Sorry but nerfing sorb is like encouraging defensive playstyle