d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Gvg Ladder > East Softcore Non Ladder
Prev1310311312313314581Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 14,578
Joined: Aug 1 2011
Gold: 485.49
Aug 10 2015 06:05pm
It does seem a bit suspicious that just NOW you're enforcing that rule when you're defending #1 and that you're the updater/mediator of this ladder. Seems like you don't want to give it up, then you try to kick him off the ladder when he's been on it for quite some time now without any problems...

This post was edited by Khaz on Aug 10 2015 06:08pm
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Nov 26 2014
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2015 06:10pm
I have no bias on the situation but....

I think Rick definitely has shown on this ladder at least he is GM and should not be dropped

I feel like Decarnate is sort of abusing the system. IMO they do a play-in duel for #1, ft5 not win by 2 bullshit lmfao
Member
Posts: 23,631
Joined: Sep 16 2006
Gold: 110.00
Aug 10 2015 06:11pm
trading and dueling are not related
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Joined: Nov 30 2005
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 50%
Aug 10 2015 06:12pm
Quote (AArrows @ Aug 10 2015 07:10pm)
I have no bias on the situation but....

I think Rick definitely has shown on this ladder at least he is GM and should not be dropped

I feel like Decarnate is sort of abusing the system. IMO they do a play-in duel for #1, ft5 not win by 2 bullshit lmfao


when we fite?
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Nov 26 2014
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2015 06:13pm
Quote (rickcarson82 @ Aug 10 2015 04:12pm)
when we fite?


I whispered u 600 times yesterday and 500 right now LOL
Member
Posts: 29,062
Joined: Feb 13 2005
Gold: 150.00
Aug 10 2015 06:20pm
Quote (AArrows @ Aug 10 2015 08:10pm)
I have no bias on the situation but....

I think Rick definitely has shown on this ladder at least he is GM and should not be dropped

I feel like Decarnate is sort of abusing the system. IMO they do a play-in duel for #1, ft5 not win by 2 bullshit lmfao


He dropped himself. I admit I was pretty irritated with rick when I posted that he should have to repay his scams to compete, and would only do so IF the others agreed with it. Perhaps that was harsh.

But...

Quote (Khaz @ Aug 10 2015 08:05pm)
It does seem a bit suspicious that just NOW you're enforcing that rule when you're defending #1 and that you're the updater/mediator of this ladder. Seems like you don't want to give it up, then you try to kick him off the ladder when he's been on it for quite some time now without any problems...


You have not ever been a part of this ladder, so idk where you are basing this?

Any time I duel for #1 this rule is enforced, like I said I cannot speak for other participants. Azn Masta and I created this rule years ago and we have had many instances of ft7s.

Gvg allows for razor close duels, being a mirror match, and we wanted to make the duel for #1 extra high stakes.

This post was edited by Decarnate on Aug 10 2015 06:22pm
Member
Posts: 51,117
Joined: Apr 21 2005
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Aug 10 2015 06:21pm
I've seen duels for top spot go to 6 or 7 duels before .
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
Aug 10 2015 06:24pm
If anyone cares, this is coming from a completely unbiased point of view.

The win by 2 rule for #1 spot has been around for quite some time now and was enforced for duels between seep and myself many times in the past before Rick came along. I cannot say who is right or wrong here as I don't have all the details, but as a professional, I will state that the purpose of contracts is to settle disagreements between two parties. The "contract" in this case is agreement to all rules (no matter how much you may seem it bullshit) when you sign up for the ladder.

I would also like to mention that Rick and I have fought for the #1 spot several times and we have never had any issues, so from my point of view he is gm. Don't kick or ban him. Just re do the ft5 from scratch or complete it based on win by 2 rule.

Ps this rule was created when I ran my original ghost ladder (it was actually my rule),

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Aug 10 2015 06:25pm
Member
Posts: 29,062
Joined: Feb 13 2005
Gold: 150.00
Aug 10 2015 06:28pm
Quote (Azn Masta @ Aug 10 2015 08:24pm)
If anyone cares, this is coming from a completely unbiased point of view.

The win by 2 rule for #1 spot has been around for quite some time now and was enforced for duels between seep and myself many times in the past before Rick came along. I cannot say who is right or wrong here as I don't have all the details, but as a professional, I will state that the purpose of contracts is to settle disagreements between two parties. The "contract" in this case is agreement to all rules (no matter how much you may seem it bullshit) when you sign up for the ladder.

I would also like to mention that Rick and I have fought for the #1 spot several times and we have never had any issues, so from my point of view he is gm. Don't kick or ban him. Just re do the ft5 from scratch or complete it based on win by 2 rule.

Ps this rule was created when I ran my original ghost ladder (it was actually my rule),


Thank you for your input sir. And your time away from vacation in Cancun! B)

Anyone else like to contribute some feedback?
Member
Posts: 62,641
Joined: Aug 15 2012
Gold: 30.00
Aug 10 2015 06:28pm
I wanna see how many scams the mods can find that he's done rofl
I bet they say hes paid them all then 1 month later say they found more

My input is nulled, but let the poor guy gvg.
He might cause a ruckus but meh

This post was edited by straightedgerevenge on Aug 10 2015 06:29pm
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1310311312313314581Next
Add Reply New Topic