d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > United Guilds Melee Ladder > Us East Non Ladder
Prev1287028712872287328743166Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 10,265
Joined: May 1 2018
Gold: 73.94
May 18 2020 01:37pm
Quote (Diablo 2 Barb @ May 18 2020 03:18pm)
Its not half the facts, what you are referencing isnt pertinent. I assume you mean since he requested a refund that exhonerates him?

A.) Go buy a stolen tv and tell the cops you knew it was stolen but you only intended on watching it by yourself. Since everyone has such a problem with it you have since requested a refund so youre good now right?

B.) Requesting a refund doesnt change the fact he knew it was stolen and didnt care how his actions affected the victims, only how the blow back affected himself.


I dont state every detail about what transpired because theyre not relevant, not because im trying to hide facts.


I’m talking about the first situation with Estim where Jake did nothing wrong at all, but Tonice failed to mention any of the mitigating facts like:

Jake was sold items by hacker who had posed as Elden on Elden’s GD account. Jake had no way of knowing anything was amiss til he was informed later.

Jake offered the eat the cost and return the items to Estim. Estim declined.

And yes, with the second situation as well. I’m not saying Jake getting a refund absolves him completely, but failing to mention that he returned the item seems like a pretty fucking large oversight if you’re trying to present a fair view.

So yeah man I think “half the facts” seems about fucking right

This post was edited by Poog on May 18 2020 01:38pm
Member
Posts: 20,615
Joined: Jul 11 2003
Gold: 15,275.00
May 18 2020 01:47pm
Quote (Poog @ May 18 2020 03:37pm)
I’m talking about the first situation with Estim where Jake did nothing wrong at all, but Tonice failed to mention any of the mitigating facts like:

Jake was sold items by hacker who had posed as Elden on Elden’s GD account. He had no way of knowing anything was amiss til he was informed later

Jake offered the eat the cost and return the items to Estim. Estim declines.

And Yes, with the second situation as well. I’m not saying Jake getting a refund absolves him completely, but failing to mention that he returned the item seems like a pretty fucking large oversight if you’re trying to present a fair view.

So yeah man I think “half the facts” seems about fucking right


I saw those same items posted in jakees thread on gd and immediately thought "I wonder if those are stolen?" If I was buying them I would have asked for a history on them. With a trove of zon items just hitting the market if njaguar himself posted top tier java gear ft id ask for history.

That being said, I specifically stood up for Jakee back then to and said that he owned his mistake and even though more could have been done to stop it from happening it was just a mistake. Ill find the discord logs if you like.

That doesnt change what he did afterwords tho. Facts:

1.) He knew it was stolen
2.) Knowing this he bought it.
3.) He only regretted the purchase because other people had a problem with it.

Making a mistake previously and then doing the right thing does not make it ok to then later commit the offense. You cant buy a stolen car, realize its stolen and hand it over to police and then it be okay to go steal a car...
Member
Posts: 41,065
Joined: Nov 24 2007
Gold: 3,518.44
May 18 2020 02:17pm
Quote (Poog @ May 18 2020 03:37pm)
I’m talking about the first situation with Estim where Jake did nothing wrong at all, but Tonice failed to mention any of the mitigating facts like:

Jake was sold items by hacker who had posed as Elden on Elden’s GD account. Jake had no way of knowing anything was amiss til he was informed later.

Jake offered the eat the cost and return the items to Estim. Estim declined.

And yes, with the second situation as well. I’m not saying Jake getting a refund absolves him completely, but failing to mention that he returned the item seems like a pretty fucking large oversight if you’re trying to present a fair view.

So yeah man I think “half the facts” seems about fucking right



He still tried to sell the items at a full price without saying they were stolen tho... shady af lol
Member
Posts: 40,371
Joined: Nov 15 2018
Gold: 338.00
May 18 2020 02:17pm
Quote (Poog @ May 18 2020 03:37pm)
I’m talking about the first situation with Estim where Jake did nothing wrong at all, but Tonice failed to mention any of the mitigating facts like:

Jake was sold items by hacker who had posed as Elden on Elden’s GD account. Jake had no way of knowing anything was amiss til he was informed later.

Jake offered the eat the cost and return the items to Estim. Estim declined.

And yes, with the second situation as well. I’m not saying Jake getting a refund absolves him completely, but failing to mention that he returned the item seems like a pretty fucking large oversight if you’re trying to present a fair view.

So yeah man I think “half the facts” seems about fucking right


Yeah for sure, I bought a stolen car from a guy last week for dirt cheap, when I got pulled over for speeding the cop ran the plates and found this out but when I said I was sorry and offered to give the car back IF I WAS REFUNDED he let me go and thus I'm a free man today

Don't forget that he lied and told people it was an ebotdz because he knew it was wrong lol

This post was edited by Ergot on May 18 2020 02:22pm
Member
Posts: 14,390
Joined: Feb 26 2010
Gold: 132.57
May 18 2020 04:30pm
Sigh, I don't want this job lol, I don't know jake and im just now learning about all this. Ive already been wrong about the other blood cleaver too until i realized yakkus still had De's
Member
Posts: 79,859
Joined: Oct 5 2005
Gold: 50.69
May 18 2020 04:49pm
Waiting for the Jake's a good guy post's


Member
Posts: 12,600
Joined: Feb 16 2009
Gold: 1,319.00
May 18 2020 04:53pm
Actually homosexuality used to be banned from ugml back in the day
Member
Posts: 7,276
Joined: Feb 2 2009
Gold: 440.00
May 18 2020 05:07pm
I feel that stolen items should be banned but the user should not be. Gear checks during matches should be implemented to keep track of this issue. Choosing to duel with said user or others in pn is up to each individual.
Member
Posts: 41,286
Joined: Apr 16 2006
Gold: 1,012.53
Trader: Trusted
May 18 2020 05:14pm
Quote (Truonk @ May 18 2020 06:07pm)
I feel that stolen items should be banned but the user should not be. Gear checks during matches should be implemented to keep track of this issue. Choosing to duel with said user or others in pn is up to each individual.


who's to say after said gear check the said user doesnt swap rq
Member
Posts: 7,276
Joined: Feb 2 2009
Gold: 440.00
May 18 2020 05:17pm
Quote (Jamaal @ May 18 2020 06:14pm)
who's to say after said gear check the said user doesnt swap rq


Med's/ ugml mods such as yourself should sit in during battle. That's how the Japs played melee back then
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1287028712872287328743166Next
Add Reply New Topic