Quote (Poog @ May 18 2020 03:37pm)
I’m talking about the first situation with Estim where Jake did nothing wrong at all, but Tonice failed to mention any of the mitigating facts like:
Jake was sold items by hacker who had posed as Elden on Elden’s GD account. He had no way of knowing anything was amiss til he was informed later
Jake offered the eat the cost and return the items to Estim. Estim declines.
And Yes, with the second situation as well. I’m not saying Jake getting a refund absolves him completely, but failing to mention that he returned the item seems like a pretty fucking large oversight if you’re trying to present a fair view.
So yeah man I think “half the facts” seems about fucking right
I saw those same items posted in jakees thread on gd and immediately thought "I wonder if those are stolen?" If I was buying them I would have asked for a history on them. With a trove of zon items just hitting the market if njaguar himself posted top tier java gear ft id ask for history.
That being said, I specifically stood up for Jakee back then to and said that he owned his mistake and even though more could have been done to stop it from happening it was just a mistake. Ill find the discord logs if you like.
That doesnt change what he did afterwords tho. Facts:
1.) He knew it was stolen
2.) Knowing this he bought it.
3.) He only regretted the purchase because other people had a problem with it.
Making a mistake previously and then doing the right thing does not make it ok to then later commit the offense. You cant buy a stolen car, realize its stolen and hand it over to police and then it be okay to go steal a car...