Quote (ibzack @ Nov 1 2009 12:36pm)

my guess is he was anya glitched and didn't have sufficient res to cover the +10 from tgods w/o anya res

Quote (ibzack @ Nov 1 2009 02:43pm)

i don't need you to agree with me for my statements to be valid


unlike you, they actually make sense w/o clarification

Quote (Jawn16 @ Nov 1 2009 04:00pm)

nope

Quote (ibzack @ 1 Nov 2009 21:36)

my guess is he was anya glitched and didn't have sufficient res to cover the +10 from tgods w/o anya res

Quote (Perserker[PvP] @ Nov 1 2009 04:36pm)

even if my nec didn't have 150@ base res in all setups the absorb of tg still makes a difference. you sir have no clue what you're talking about, seriously.

Quote (ClanBK @ 1 Nov 2009 22:41)

he's talking about the stack, not the sorb, which would make a difference

Quote (Perserker[PvP)

,Nov 1 2009 04:44pm]even if i didn't have stacked res the absorb would make a difference.
the problem about testing trap dmg is the fact that the dmg difference min/max is too high (1-6xxx). it would need many test hits to get a better, more clear result.

Quote (ClanBK @ Nov 1 2009 04:41pm)

he's talking about the stack, not the sorb, which would make a difference

Quote (ClanBK @ 1 Nov 2009 22:52)

^^

Quote (Perserker[PvP] @ 1 Nov 2009 22:36)

even if my nec didn't have 150@ base res in all setups the absorb of tg still makes a difference. you sir have no clue what you're talking about, seriously.

Quote (Perserker[PvP] @ Nov 1 2009 05:07pm)

let's go on like this for a while to increase our postcount.

Quote (ClanBK @ 1 Nov 2009 23:10)

if you wanna keep ignoring the obvious then okay sure

we realize absorb still helps whether you have max res or not, but the discussion isn't about sorb, its about the tgods stack