d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > Which Car Do You Drive???
Prev19394959697167Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 83504Replies: 1663Track Topic
Member
Posts: 8,992
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 18,640.00
#941
May 28 2013 08:19am
Quote (Sopranos @ May 27 2013 11:54pm)
nice boat.


Mustang is not a boat too? ;)
Member
Posts: 13,050
Joined: Feb 1 2007
Gold: 0.00
#942
May 28 2013 11:38am
Quote (OMGNOWAYSRSLY @ May 28 2013 05:24am)
2012 Ram 1500 Hemi 4x4
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/mykeltoliver/truck.jpg


91 Jeep Cherokee trail rig (not street legal or anything)
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/mykeltoliver/Jeep.jpg


Love that Comanche look.
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
#943
May 30 2013 07:26pm
Quote (Decom @ May 28 2013 10:19am)
Mustang is not a boat too? ;)



a mustang is to a dingy as a challenger is to a freighter :P


dont get me wrong, his car is beautiful, its just that theyre way too heavy.
Member
Posts: 1,307
Joined: Jul 30 2007
Gold: 55.35
#944
May 31 2013 03:51pm
2012 Challenger - 3,834 lbs - 375 HP and 410 ft-lbs of torque

2012 Mustang gt coupe - 3,650 Convertible - 3,780 with 402 HP and 377 ft-lbs of torque


Tell me the mustang isnt just as "boatly" as a Challenger. 20 lb/ft is equal to a 180lb difference IMO
Member
Posts: 8,992
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 18,640.00
#945
May 31 2013 06:31pm
Quote (OMGNOWAYSRSLY @ May 31 2013 05:51pm)
2012 Challenger -  3,834 lbs - 375 HP and 410 ft-lbs of torque

2012 Mustang gt coupe - 3,650 Convertible - 3,780  with 402 HP and 377 ft-lbs of torque


Tell me the mustang isnt just as "boatly" as a Challenger.  20 lb/ft is equal to a 180lb difference IMO


Hmm those numbers ARE pretty close...
Member
Posts: 4,719
Joined: Dec 16 2010
Gold: 19.87
#946
Jun 1 2013 01:22pm
Quote (OMGNOWAYSRSLY @ May 31 2013 04:51pm)
2012 Challenger -  3,834 lbs - 375 HP and 410 ft-lbs of torque

2012 Mustang gt coupe - 3,650 Convertible - 3,780  with 402 HP and 377 ft-lbs of torque


Tell me the mustang isnt just as "boatly" as a Challenger.  20 lb/ft is equal to a 180lb difference IMO


...

Challenger R/T- 5300 lbs gross weight, 4082 curb weight 375 hp, 410 lb-ft (per Edmunds)

http://www.edmunds.com/dodge/challenger/2012/features-specs.html?style=101403285

Mustang GT Premium Coupe- Gross Weight 4600, curb 3605 412 hp, 390 lb-ft

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2012/features-specs.html?style=101369166

Cite sources for your numbers?

Your challenger is fat.

This post was edited by gusdidit on Jun 1 2013 01:23pm
Member
Posts: 1,307
Joined: Jul 30 2007
Gold: 55.35
#947
Jun 6 2013 07:16am
i got mine off ford and dodge's website. but could be wrong.

traded in my ram yesterday... for this...



This post was edited by OMGNOWAYSRSLY on Jun 6 2013 07:17am
Member
Posts: 29,181
Joined: Aug 5 2008
Gold: 1,808.05
#948
Jun 6 2013 10:45pm


08 428r stage 3 roush supercharged

Member
Posts: 12,816
Joined: Oct 3 2007
Gold: 3,295.00
#949
Jun 7 2013 07:42pm


This post was edited by Krnboi12345 on Jun 7 2013 07:43pm
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
#950
Jun 8 2013 12:27pm
Quote (OMGNOWAYSRSLY @ May 31 2013 05:51pm)
2012 Challenger -  3,834 lbs - 375 HP and 410 ft-lbs of torque

2012 Mustang gt coupe - 3,650 Convertible - 3,780  with 402 HP and 377 ft-lbs of torque


Tell me the mustang isnt just as "boatly" as a Challenger.  20 lb/ft is equal to a 180lb difference IMO


convertibles are heavier than regular coupes.... and your numbers for the stangs power are horribly off. 2012 gts came with 412 hp, not 402, regardless...

400lbs is a big difference weight wise, so i stand by my analogy.
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev19394959697167Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact