Quote (SBD @ 24 Jan 2024 09:18)
While I have little to no moral disagreement with the death penalty being given out to violent criminals, murders and drug traffickers, to my knowledge its does little to nothing to actually deter crime.
Now I am sure there's studies showing both directions with no actual definitive conclusion.
There is absolutely no way though in my mind that the death penalty will stop the flow or trafficking of drugs, people will absolutely risk their lives , or be forced to via gang involvement, which I am sure any large scale trafficker is part of. Sling drugs or what, die on the streets in poverty or engage in other criminal activity, people are just going to continue to sling drugs. I mean how many routinely risk getting shot / killed regularly in gang violence, risk of a death penalty, death just seems like a risk of the trade.
+1 pretty much this.
I'll add by saying that the real "leaders of drug crime syndicates" are not the guys on the FBI's "Most Wanted" List. Those are the fall guys like el Chapo and the real kingpins have never been caught and if they were they've been replaced.
I've seen the countries who give death sentences for DUI's and their numbers went way down because no one is going to drive after 6 shots of tequila if the consequence is a "firing squad".
The same would happen if you added a "potential death sentence" to drug trafficking's crimes. You would see a small reduction but someone would fill that gap there's too much money and power involved.
Fentanyl is a plague on our country and it's being produced by the Chinese and Mexican cartels but it's odd how Mexican cartels have come out publicly saying they would kill anyone in their organization distributing fentanyl because it's bad for business(dead user gives no cash). But this could easily be a lie and the Chinese could easily pay the cartel or other distributors to lace their products like cocaine, weed, heroin, meth, and pills with fentanyl.
It's a complex issue that sadly could only be rectified by basically sending in Navy Seals to decapitate cartels and their production sites. Many world leaders have discussed this type of action because drugs in general erode society on multiple levels.
Sadly violence leads to more violence and like the previous poster said the drugs will always flow around because someone is always willing to take the risk and users will always pay for a high.
edit: Studies have shown that a portion of the world's GDP is from "drug proceeds" when you have a system that is better compensated it naturally proliferates.
I sold weed for years with a group of friends just so we all had access to cannabis. This was when it was illegal and most possession charges could be a felony.
Despite the fact that we weren't trying to "make money" and just "smoke weed for free" we started making tons of cash.
We all started spending that money buying snowboards, ATV's, cars, clothes, etc.
At one point our friend would drive with 25k from Chicago to Cali and scoop a ton of cannabis product(edibles, concentrates, flower). Get back and sell it all in less then two weeks and make 50-75k.
The reason I'm bringing this up is because it shows how easily one can profit off the drug trade and how a few high schoolers who were just trying to "smoke for free" created a small cannabis operation.
I'll always take a harder stance on harder drugs. Cannabis and Psilocybin have no place as a schedule 1 drug. So when were talking about the death penalty let's at least equate it to chemicals/drugs that can actually kill people.
This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Jan 24 2024 10:17am