Quote (Goomshill @ Jul 16 2023 01:49pm)
So I don't think the lack of answers to any of this has changed in months:
- That Ukraine was a legitimate democracy prior to 2014 and America helped overthrow their government in a color revolution and set up a client state.
- That the population of the separatist regions overwhelming supported joining Russia because they are mostly ethnic Russians who had been in a siege for most of a decade.
- That Nazism was and still is widespread among Ukraine's military and especially eastern population bordering the separatist regions.
- That the conflict has been immensely destructive on both sides, with large casualties and many war crimes and cities razed and extensive landmining that will persist.
- That the most likely outcome hasn't changed at all, that battle lines are static and entrenched, and all casualties between now and the eventual resolution will be for nothing
Is there any change to any of that?
What is your definition of a legitimate democracy ?
What is your source to support the claim re: separatist regions ? I presume you dont mean crimea (in that agree that crimea overwhelmingly supported being part of russia)
What metric did you use to support the notion that ultra-nationalists are predominantly in eastern Ukraine ?
Its a fact that the conflict has been immensely destructive on both sides, i.e. colossal loss of life.
What is your definition of "will be for nothing" ? I don't think that Russia (say, Putin), sees the war as being "for nothing", He is seeking to retain Russian security against Nato Aggression. That is not "nothing".