d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1297329742975297629774529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 14 2023 02:30pm
Quote (Djunior @ 14 Jun 2023 22:11)
Obviously peace terms will be written down, simply saying trust us NATO won't expand East is not going to work :lol:
Your meme is crap for the simple reason that it doesn't work like that. NATO and Russia have spent trillion and trillions and trillions since the cold war in armaments etc. It was literally the most important thing, everything else came second.
Do you really believe a shitty excuse "those countries wanted it" is going to make your adversary say oh well just take it! Do whatever you want! NO it doesn't work like that and smart leaders decades ago understood that.


Don't try to time travel or to pretend that Nato tried to invade Russia... Here's what you said:

"The only way to proceed IMO is to negotiate and Ukrainian neutrality is a no brainer, Russia won't accept any other outcome. Crimea is a no brainer too but likely all 4 territories that were annexed."

- Do you think Ukrainians will accept their fate and stop fighting ?
- Do you think Russia will accept to give back all what it stole (in museums etc) ?
- Do you think Russia will deliver all the war criminals who were decorated by Putin ?
- Do you think Russia will pay war reparations ?
- Are you sure it will put Europe in a good position for the future ?
- Are you sure Russia will not try, later, to take others territories or small countries (including the rest of Ukraine) ?

Btw recently Putin said Ukraine was belonging to Russian Empire, and that "Ukraine" isn't even a country on the map...
Also: https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3224021/putin-ponders-should-russia-try-take-ukraines-capital-kyiv-again

I am asking you again, are you sure your "solution" will bring peace ? :lol:



This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jun 14 2023 02:46pm
Member
Posts: 51,724
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Jun 14 2023 03:31pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jun 14 2023 08:02pm)
No way, you don't understand what i means: this is a callout: I am waiting for answers.
"Peaceful solution" or "Terrible Warmonger West" along with "Both Sides" ? Sure: I am now asking these people:
How do you want to proceed exactly and show me how it will bring peace ?

Good luck ^_^


In terms of a peace deal, it is a FACT that the west DOES NOT want peace today.

This is a video from yesterday:



There was another one from a couple of days ago where this man said now is not the time to look for peace, only from a position of strength can Ukraine look for peace with Russia. This logic is simply not sound in my opinion and the additional support outlined in the video above will only bring us closer to a Nato v Russia direct conflict, which Nato wins hands down, ergo the risk of non-conventional escalation. The EU sees this as russian imperialism. The US sees it as maintaining its perceived sphere of influence and Russia sees it as an existential threat. Those ideas/values/views are a recipe for disaster.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 14 2023 03:34pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 14 2023 03:55pm
Quote (ferdia @ 14 Jun 2023 23:31)
In terms of a peace deal, it is a FACT that the west DOES NOT want peace today.
This is a video from yesterday:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luo8xG3SyUM
There was another one from a couple of days ago where this man said now is not the time to look for peace, only from a position of strength can Ukraine look for peace with Russia. This logic is simply not sound in my opinion and the additional support outlined in the video above will only bring us closer to a Nato v Russia direct conflict, which Nato wins hands down, ergo the risk of non-conventional escalation. The EU sees this as russian imperialism. The US sees it as maintaining its perceived sphere of influence and Russia sees it as an existential threat. Those ideas/values/views are a recipe for disaster.


Instead of saying that Nato "doesn't want peace" (While Russia invaded Ukraine...)... In practice, concretely, step by step, what is your solution for "peace" then ? Thanks in advance for a clear point instead of crying wolf.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 14 2023 04:23pm
All priests who speak out against the Ukraine war will be prosecuted

https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2023/06/14/russian-orthodox-church-officially-renounces-pacifism-en

Nice regime.
Member
Posts: 19,886
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,502.50
Warn: 10%
Jun 14 2023 04:26pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jun 14 2023 10:31pm)
In terms of a peace deal, it is a FACT that the west DOES NOT want peace today.

This is a video from yesterday:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luo8xG3SyUM

There was another one from a couple of days ago where this man said now is not the time to look for peace, only from a position of strength can Ukraine look for peace with Russia. This logic is simply not sound in my opinion and the additional support outlined in the video above will only bring us closer to a Nato v Russia direct conflict, which Nato wins hands down, ergo the risk of non-conventional escalation. The EU sees this as russian imperialism. The US sees it as maintaining its perceived sphere of influence and Russia sees it as an existential threat. Those ideas/values/views are a recipe for disaster.


Poor evaluation, and even worse comprehension.

Your opinion on this is worthless. Not only because it is badly formed; but because it is not you that decides. It is Ukrainians that decide whether they will continue to fight.
It's not the EU, it's not NATO, it's not stoltenberg and it certainly isn't you.

You also take for granted that Russia wish to end the war as soon as The West would agree.
What utter nonsense. Your proven yourself completely worthless of commentary on the subject.

Stick to plugging youtube cudeos, b0tting d2r and congratulating supporters of genocide. Pathetic.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Jun 14 2023 04:27pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jun 14 2023 04:34pm
Quote (ferdia @ 14 Jun 2023 23:31)
In terms of a peace deal, it is a FACT that the west DOES NOT want peace today.

This is a video from yesterday:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luo8xG3SyUM

There was another one from a couple of days ago where this man said now is not the time to look for peace, only from a position of strength can Ukraine look for peace with Russia. This logic is simply not sound in my opinion and the additional support outlined in the video above will only bring us closer to a Nato v Russia direct conflict, which Nato wins hands down, ergo the risk of non-conventional escalation. The EU sees this as russian imperialism. The US sees it as maintaining its perceived sphere of influence and Russia sees it as an existential threat. Those ideas/values/views are a recipe for disaster.


your typical, intellectually lazy, pro-russian take on the issue.

"the west" would LOVE to have peace. there isn't a single western leader that'd oppose actual peace in ukraine, not even the bloodthirsty and powerhungry yanks. remember, "the west" did neither want nor start the war. russia did. if russia withdrew from ukraine tomorrow and offered peace, "the west" and ukraine would happily accept that.

you KNOW that of course. it just doesn't fit your moronic "both sides" narrative. so you frame it like the west just "wants" this brutal war. that's just absurd and dishonest.
in reality, "the west" simply does not want to reward the murdering of women and children, the destruction of a whole country, and the damage done to the economy, with massive territorial and political gains. understandably so. russia's constant aggression against its neighbours, its strategy of initiating or fabricating a crisis, invading and annexing the region, declaring "peace", and inevitably coming back for even more later, has to end - once and for all.

in short, "the west" doesn't want a temporary, fragile "peace" that rewards russia for starting a war. "the west" wants real and lasting peace, not a deal that'd just encourage future wars.
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Jun 14 2023 04:41pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Jun 14 2023 07:26pm)
Poor evaluation, and even worse comprehension.

Your opinion on this is worthless. Not only because it is badly formed; but because it is not you that decides. It is Ukrainians that decide whether they will continue to fight.
It's not the EU, it's not NATO, it's not stoltenberg and it certainly isn't you.

You also take for granted that Russia wish to end the war as soon as The West would agree.
What utter nonsense. Your proven yourself completely worthless of commentary on the subject.

Stick to plugging youtube cudeos, b0tting d2r and congratulating supporters of genocide. Pathetic.


It's impressive you are able to maintain this level of frothing at the mouth rage all the time, seems like it would be tiring but not for you. Inspirational really.
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Jun 14 2023 04:43pm
Quote (fender @ Jun 14 2023 07:34pm)
your typical, intellectually lazy, pro-russian take on the issue.

"the west" would LOVE to have peace. there isn't a single western leader that'd oppose actual peace in ukraine, not even the bloodthirsty and powerhungry yanks. remember, "the west" did neither want nor start the war. russia did. if russia withdrew from ukraine tomorrow and offered peace, "the west" and ukraine would happily accept that.

you KNOW that of course. it just doesn't fit your moronic "both sides" narrative. so you frame it like the west just "wants" this brutal war. that's just absurd and dishonest.
in reality, "the west" simply does not want to reward the murdering of women and children, the destruction of a whole country, and the damage done to the economy, with massive territorial and political gains. understandably so. russia's constant aggression against its neighbours, its strategy of initiating or fabricating a crisis, invading and annexing the region, declaring "peace", and inevitably coming back for even more later, has to end - once and for all.

in short, "the west" doesn't want a temporary, fragile "peace" that rewards russia for starting a war. "the west" wants real and lasting peace, not a deal that'd just encourage future wars.


Fender will be okay, he just needs a little time to get over his panzers getting wrecked, everyone try to be supportive and kind during this difficult period.
Member
Posts: 4,591
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Jun 14 2023 05:05pm
the west would love to have peace HAHAHAHA :rofl:

Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Jun 15 2023 12:43am)
Fender will be okay, he just needs a little time to get over his panzers getting wrecked, everyone try to be supportive and kind during this difficult period.


heinrich loves to see panzers rolling east again, just like the good old days B)

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 14 2023 05:06pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 15 Jun 2023 00:41)
It's impressive you are able to maintain this level of frothing at the mouth rage all the time, seems like it would be tiring but not for you. Inspirational really.

Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 15 Jun 2023 00:43)
Fender will be okay, he just needs a little time to get over his panzers getting wrecked, everyone try to be supportive and kind during this difficult period.

Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ 15 Jun 2023 01:05)
the west would love to have peace HAHAHAHA :rofl:
heinrich loves to see panzers rolling east again, just like the good old days B)


And you, what you are ? 2022 & 2021 accounts doing personal attacks = Trolls.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1297329742975297629774529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll