Quote (Meanwhile @ Jun 6 2023 08:35am)
So you put all the dams in the same bag ? Not very serious... This dam is very significant
* The dam, 30 metres (98 feet) tall and 3.2 km (2 miles) long, was built in 1956 on the Dnipro river as part of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant.
* The reservoir also supplies water to the Crimean peninsula, annexed by Russia in 2014, and to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which is also under Russian control.
* The volume of water in the reservoir is about equal to the Great Salt Lake in the U.S. state of Utah.
* Blowing the Soviet-era dam, which is controlled by Russia, would unleash a wall of floodwater across much of the Kherson region.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tRYWbVD5AEtss
it is a large dam, but it doesn´t matter a lot in the grand scheme of things. It would´ve mattered far more if surovikin didn´t withdraw russian troops in kherson.
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Jun 6 2023 08:07am)
This all makes sense
But regarding #4, Is there not much extra risk to the NPP? I mean obviously it's not an ideal spot for a NPP but you dont think the dam being destroyed will have any serious affect on it?
I know nothing about how they work really
Loss of electricity short term, but they can just turn off NPP. As long as they do it in a timely manner it shouldn´t be dangerous.
This is for the most part a small to small-mid humanitarian crisis.
This post was edited by ownyaah on Jun 6 2023 01:07am