your ignorance is pretty funny in this context. thats his book. he laboriously goes over state propaganda, defector interviews, his experience there, and many other sources. rates them for credibility to make sense about the most extreme claims of both sides, NK and the world at large. gives a full historical perspective from a military and diplomatic standpoint.

you're blindly discrediting something then describing the best approach as the one he uses, only you're being vague and he wasn't. you look like a fool.

Clever, but no one is fooled.

HE is not a credible source, ergo neither is his book. Which, btw is not about NK, but about Kim's father.

we of course he isn't credible, i mean why would he be? that's like the whole thing that would discredit your side of the argument. of course to know you'd need to do more than a google search with the bias set in your brain in queue to be confirmed so that you can dig deeper into a topic you havent researched so that you can continue shooting from the hip like the same impulsive idiot you always are. you are too lazy, and too stubborn to ever learn. luckily you're at the end of life that doesnt matter much.

go ahead keep living up to the breitbart lack of research standard for North Korean rhetoric. sit scared you little man. heaven forbid you actually research something. i wont even dig into the irony of you discrediting him based on an appearance on a news network thats one of the veins of your exact stance on this issue in terms of spreading of ideas. that might give you an aneurysm.

Skipped right over that little tidbit, where your own guys book, was not about what you claimed.

im not sure you even know how stupid you are with this argument. i dont mean the whole thread. i mean what you posted here.

the book is about Kim Jung Il, the dictator and rule of the country that we're talking about. it include history on his father, kim il sung, the man who started the korean war, lead the revolution of his people, transformed himself into a god figure and away from communism which has formed the entire north korean issue for its history. then he transitioned power to his son, the topic of the book, who continued the process and spiraled the propoganda to build on lies to allow his regime to survive the famine, which further exacerbated the situation and still continues to drive policy implications. then it covers the transition of power to his son kim jong un the current leader and topic of this thread. he is the author of modern north korean policy.

kim jun il and north korea, especially given historical and modern context, is indiscernible from the topic of North Korea as a whole. It's like drawing a line between Marx and the communist manifesto. you're reaching so hard its embarrassing. you've gotten to a sad place here man.

and that's not the worst part. i clearly said repeatedly that i listened to lectures and interviews, many of which are him commenting on the modern day debacle with North Korea, on network news, university lectures, podcasts, and other works. you have no leg to stand on, but i'm sure you'll keep digging, you're not really capable of anything else.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 3 2017 07:34pm

Kim Jong UN rules NK at this time.

ya i countered that entirely. including telling you im drawing from more than just his book, which you can erroneously discredit entirely and still look like a fucking idiot.

the truth is you are too ignorant to even see you're wrong or you've just dug down too far to see the sun. only an imbecile or a blind man would make the argument you're making. it doesnt belong in the conversation, its simply silly. i have no problem disagreeing, but when you're wrong on all accounts and not opinion only it gets sad.

You are foaming at the mouth...kid.

you can read my posts in whatever bias confirming tone you need to back away old man. in reality ive quite enjoyed speaking on the manner and insulting you as well. you embody the opinionated ignorant stereotype. Its been a learning experience dealing with such a low information person but i do try to show people that following blindly in the herd can be a bit dangerous for a many millions of people.

you should read the book tho, its a great one. or watch a youtube video of his if your lazy. or just stay dumb.

So...agree with your idiocy, or I'm dumb.

Such exquisite fallacious reasoning. If you want to listen to or read trash...that's your choice. Just keep it to yourself, lest you damage some young person's mind.