Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 12 Jan 2022 00:23)
You would use an enzyme that cleaves DNA at certain sequences. And you would be able to identify multiple and the exact site that was cleaved and recombined. These sequences are really well established. So they also would have had to make a whole set of entirely new restriction endonuclease that uses a novel sequence never published before instead of using a cheap well characterized ones off the shelf.
I see. Still, can we really be, as you put it, "incredibly confident" that one of China's top-tier, cutting edge research labs did not possess unpublished sequences? Sorry, I really don't trust the Chinese to be transparent with their research findings, particularly when it pertains to key technology of the future like genetic engineering.
Quote (Sioux @ 12 Jan 2022 00:25)
Nah you can gibson and skip the enzymes. The furin site is objectively odd but doesn't mean it had to come from a lab.
"Doesn't mean it had to come from a lab" is a much weaker statement than what you and Netflix are arguing for, namely that it is exceedingly unlikely that the virus was modified in a lab before being leaked (if it was leaked in the first place, rather than coming directly from wild animals).
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 11 2022 05:36pm