Quote (JessiWan @ 3 Jun 2022 08:23)
So why doesn't Russia simply say to NATO, "the reason you exist is because of the Soviet union, however it doesn't exist anymore, so shouldn't you disappear too? And if you don't, I take this as a sign of aggression towards me, and there will be very serious consequences"
They've brought it up once or twice. The real answer is that NATO gives Europe and the US enough clout to impose rules on others they themselves do not follow. No program lasts nearly as long as a temporary government program that gives small minded politicians extreme power.
Quote (Skinned @ 3 Jun 2022 08:25)
Because Russia has gone to war with 15 or more of its neighbors in my lifetime dude. I'm only in my 40s.
Ever see what happened to Chechnya? They were in the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. They are a terrorist state. Ukraine is a member of the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. Georgia was a member of the UN and a member of the security council....attacked then.
Self defense is a right and need if you live by orcs. You guys are all like built a wall because Mexicans want to work here, but it's cool if Russians murder Ukrainians because their lives are beneath consideration.
So wait, back up a second. You're saying that regional conflicts between Russia and former Soviet Bloc nations merit mid range missile systems being pointed at Moscow from all bordering nations? Interesting. So this list isn't exhaustive, and only lists "major" conflicts, which Ukraine would not yet technically qualify as were it the US engaging:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_StatesHaving reviewed the list, tell me, how many weapon systems should be pointing at DC right now?
Quote (bogie160 @ 3 Jun 2022 08:25)
The United States would launch a retaliatory nuclear strike if NATO bases (containing American troops!) were attacked by Russian nuclear arms. If Russia wants to trade Warsaw for Moscow, more power to them. The situation would escalate and every major population center in Russia would end up destroyed. The only way out would be the immediate and unconditional surrender of the Russian military.
We're talking about Russia using nukes because an authoritarian Russian regime is trying to make up lost ground by reclaiming overlordship over its near abroad. We have no reason to allow that. Russia needs to accept, as the British did, its lesser status in the world today. If not to us, then to China. It's over for them.
Oh, right, we'd respond because of our Troops. Just like we did in Benghazi? Get real. It's more likely we'd drone strike some poor goat herder on Russia's Eastern border and his poor family, claim it was Putin, and call it a day. Shit, if it can work in Afghanistan, why not vs Russia?
Pretending like troops matter to the politicians currently in power is so fucking laughable.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Jun 3 2022 09:40am