d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev19229239249259265001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 3 2022 09:25am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jun 3 2022 11:17am)
Destroyed by whom? You seem to assume there's some inevitability that the entire world will band together and go after Russia. Tell me, what about the world today strikes you as so united that such an event seems likely?

The only chance that what you say would happen is if US responded with the full force of our nuclear arsenal. And given the current US sentiment AGAINST the use of nukes for ANY reason, I find it unlikely that any sitting politician would endorse such a move unless the homeland itself were hit by a nuke from Russia.

And tell everyone now, why is this even a conversation? Why would we be talking about Russia using nukes? It wouldn't have anything to do with NATO putting weapons on over half of Russia's western border pointing at Moscow, would it? It wouldn't happen to have anything to do with a call to get the majority of the remainder of that border into NATO to install more weapons, would it?

Oh trust me, Russia has a BIG say on the outcome of just who can and who can't join NATO. :)


The United States would launch a retaliatory nuclear strike if NATO bases (containing American troops!) were attacked by Russian nuclear arms. If Russia wants to trade Warsaw for Moscow, more power to them. The situation would escalate and every major population center in Russia would end up destroyed. The only way out would be the immediate and unconditional surrender of the Russian military.

We're talking about Russia using nukes because an authoritarian Russian regime is trying to make up lost ground by reclaiming overlordship over its near abroad. We have no reason to allow that. Russia needs to accept, as the British did, its lesser status in the world today. If not to us, then to China. It's over for them.

This post was edited by bogie160 on Jun 3 2022 09:27am
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jun 3 2022 09:30am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jun 3 2022 09:47am)
NATO was formed as a military alliance to counter any offensive move westward by the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union is gone. NATO should be gone too. Instead, half the Soviet Block is now NATO, and more of Russia's western border is neighbored by NATO nations than not. Every one of those NATO nations has either US troops or US weapons housed in them, and the only purpose for those troops and weapons is a threat against Russia. "Do what we say, or we're ready for war."

If any other nation on the planet were to install mid range missile installations on the US border, it'd be instant war. The last time it was attempted? Cuba. Are you familiar? Russia absolutely has a say on which nations borders it that are going to be able to house weapons pointed at them. Whether or not their say matters completely depends on how much they want to weight their words. If they turn around and invade every NATO country that directly borders them, then Nuke every NATO country that tries to respond, I tend to think that they have a much larger say than some dipshit on the internet.


NATO should be gone, but that doesn't deal with reality: it exists, and a plethora of nations that suffered under Soviet dominance want to be protected from having to live under it again. And I don't blame them.

We don't have mid range missile installations in Europe (or even short range). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate-Range_Nuclear_Forces_Treaty

Quote (Bananii @ Jun 3 2022 10:07am)
i bet youre fine with paying money for a fuck

and let me repeat: while you blame russia for doing bad things, you americans doing much worse things youre fine with.

„we have nukes, we dont give a fuck“

fuckin disgusting. 🤮


What exactly is it you think "I'm fine with?" Provide quotes by me to support it. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Jun 3 2022 09:31am
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 3 2022 08:25am)
Russia needs to accept, as the British did, its lesser status in the world today. If not to us, then to China. It's over for them.


Russia needs to accept its lesser status in the world?

How can any sane person talk like this and expect there to be good will between nations and peace in the world.
Member
Posts: 5,163
Joined: Jun 5 2020
Gold: 291.67
Warn: 10%
Jun 3 2022 09:32am
Quote (JessiWan @ Jun 3 2022 05:23pm)
So why doesn't Russia simply say to NATO, "the reason you exist is because of the Soviet union, however it doesn't exist anymore, so shouldn't you disappear too? And if you don't, I take this as a sign of aggression towards me, and there will be very serious consequences"


nato/western world ignoring what russia say?
and propaganda tv saying „putin dont want talk“

theres enoguh videos where putin say that...
for example i remember putin talking in german government about that in 2001. hes exactly saying what the problems with nato are and that russia want be partners with us, not playing against us.

people do ignore that fact. like people ignore the iraq, afghanistan, lybia, syria etc wars. they just ignore motherfucker US invading countrys for oil. they just ignore that fact and think they doing right.

USA = warmonging scammers pretending doing right while brainwashing their people, which shoot themselfs for shit.

Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jun 3 2022 09:33am
Quote (Skinned @ Jun 3 2022 11:16am)


He is an authoritarian dude. He believes Ukrainians should be deported and murdered because they did not willing become subjects of an illiberal state where all acts are either compulsory or forbidden.

Like some others who have deep throated the boot, thin blue line cucks I'm sure, they don't believe in an inalienable right to self defense.


You really have no idea what you're talking, you're the personification of the simp educated by the idiot box on this issue. I've been to Ukraine half a dozen times prior to this war. Both before and after 2014. Know people both in Russia and Ukraine. What I wanted is for that world not to be turned into a war zone, meanwhile people like you that have no ties to it have been programmed to be a neocon and supporting wars, interventions all over the world. In the 60s liberals were staunchly anti-war today you guys are the biggest cheerleaders for it.
Member
Posts: 39,736
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Jun 3 2022 09:34am
Quote (Skinned @ 3 Jun 2022 18:25)
Because Russia has gone to war with 15 or more of its neighbors in my lifetime dude. I'm only in my 40s.

Ever see what happened to Chechnya? They were in the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. They are a terrorist state. Ukraine is a member of the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. Georgia was a member of the UN and a member of the security council....attacked then.

Self defense is a right and need if you live by orcs. You guys are all like built a wall because Mexicans want to work here, but it's cool if Russians murder Ukrainians because their lives are beneath consideration.


So Chechnya was in UN. :rofl:
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 3 2022 09:36am
Quote (JessiWan @ Jun 3 2022 11:31am)
Russia needs to accept its lesser status in the world?

How can any sane person talk like this and expect there to be good will between nations and peace in the world.


Russia wants to be treated as a great power. It's unfortunate that they're not anymore, and they have themselves to blame. "Goodwill" in this case is the pretense that Russia deserves respect and authority to which it almost certainly isn't due.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Jun 3 2022 09:36am
Quote (JessiWan @ 3 Jun 2022 08:23)
So why doesn't Russia simply say to NATO, "the reason you exist is because of the Soviet union, however it doesn't exist anymore, so shouldn't you disappear too? And if you don't, I take this as a sign of aggression towards me, and there will be very serious consequences"


They've brought it up once or twice. The real answer is that NATO gives Europe and the US enough clout to impose rules on others they themselves do not follow. No program lasts nearly as long as a temporary government program that gives small minded politicians extreme power.

Quote (Skinned @ 3 Jun 2022 08:25)
Because Russia has gone to war with 15 or more of its neighbors in my lifetime dude. I'm only in my 40s.

Ever see what happened to Chechnya? They were in the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. They are a terrorist state. Ukraine is a member of the UN and a member of the security council attacked them. Georgia was a member of the UN and a member of the security council....attacked then.

Self defense is a right and need if you live by orcs. You guys are all like built a wall because Mexicans want to work here, but it's cool if Russians murder Ukrainians because their lives are beneath consideration.


So wait, back up a second. You're saying that regional conflicts between Russia and former Soviet Bloc nations merit mid range missile systems being pointed at Moscow from all bordering nations? Interesting. So this list isn't exhaustive, and only lists "major" conflicts, which Ukraine would not yet technically qualify as were it the US engaging: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States

Having reviewed the list, tell me, how many weapon systems should be pointing at DC right now?

Quote (bogie160 @ 3 Jun 2022 08:25)
The United States would launch a retaliatory nuclear strike if NATO bases (containing American troops!) were attacked by Russian nuclear arms. If Russia wants to trade Warsaw for Moscow, more power to them. The situation would escalate and every major population center in Russia would end up destroyed. The only way out would be the immediate and unconditional surrender of the Russian military.

We're talking about Russia using nukes because an authoritarian Russian regime is trying to make up lost ground by reclaiming overlordship over its near abroad. We have no reason to allow that. Russia needs to accept, as the British did, its lesser status in the world today. If not to us, then to China. It's over for them.


Oh, right, we'd respond because of our Troops. Just like we did in Benghazi? Get real. It's more likely we'd drone strike some poor goat herder on Russia's Eastern border and his poor family, claim it was Putin, and call it a day. Shit, if it can work in Afghanistan, why not vs Russia?

Pretending like troops matter to the politicians currently in power is so fucking laughable.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Jun 3 2022 09:40am
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 3 2022 09:38am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jun 3 2022 11:36am)
So wait, back up a second. You're saying that regional conflicts between Russia and former Soviet Bloc nations merit mid range missile systems being pointed at Moscow from all bordering nations? Interesting. So this list isn't exhaustive, and only lists "major" conflicts, which Ukraine would not yet technically qualify as were it the US engaging: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States

Having reviewed the list, tell me, how many weapon systems should be pointing at DC right now?


Life isn't fair. Didn't your mother ever tell you that?

The United States had missiles in Turkey during the Cold War, and the Russians had to deal with it. They tried to place missiles in Cuba, and the United States threatened global thermonuclear war.
Member
Posts: 5,163
Joined: Jun 5 2020
Gold: 291.67
Warn: 10%
Jun 3 2022 09:40am
Quote (Santara @ Jun 3 2022 05:30pm)
NATO should be gone, but that doesn't deal with reality: it exists, and a plethora of nations that suffered under Soviet dominance want to be protected from having to live under it again. And I don't blame them.

We don't have mid range missile installations in Europe (or even short range). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate-Range_Nuclear_Forces_Treaty



What exactly is it you think "I'm fine with?" Provide quotes by me to support it. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.


you got no honor or respect. so i bet youre fine with paying for a simple fuck and feel proud if it.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19229239249259265001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll