Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 3 2022 11:08am)
Lol.
Every population center and missile base in Russia would be destroyed. Russia can use nuclear weapons as the ultimate, last deterrent. It isn't a viable strategy for winning a war.
Russia is a suicide bomber with a nuke and a Deadman switch. A hobo with a knife. They just need beat on like any bully and they will move in to easier people to take lunch money from. Anyone who has successfully dealt with bullies knows this.
Quote (fender @ Jun 3 2022 11:15am)
if your point is "whoever supported the US' repeated unjustified wars in the middle east has no leg to stand on criticising russia for its war-mongering", you'd have a point in that they are hypocrites.
if you're suggesting "russia murdering children and civilians, bombing their neighbours back into the stone age, is not so bad because other nations did wrong things too", then you're a useful idiot for pootin's propaganda.
nothing justifies this. two wrongs don't make a right. yes, many people (especially american and british conservatives) have a pretty ridiculous double-standard when it comes to foreign interventions, but that doesn't give pootin and russia the right to repeatedly slaughter his neighbours.
He is an authoritarian dude. He believes Ukrainians should be deported and murdered because they did not willing become subjects of an illiberal state where all acts are either compulsory or forbidden.
Like some others who have deep throated the boot, thin blue line cucks I'm sure, they don't believe in an inalienable right to self defense.
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jun 3 2022 11:17am)
Destroyed by whom? You seem to assume there's some inevitability that the entire world will band together and go after Russia. Tell me, what about the world today strikes you as so united that such an event seems likely?
The only chance that what you say would happen is if US responded with the full force of our nuclear arsenal. And given the current US sentiment AGAINST the use of nukes for ANY reason, I find it unlikely that any sitting politician would endorse such a move unless the homeland itself were hit by a nuke from Russia.
And tell everyone now, why is this even a conversation? Why would we be talking about Russia using nukes? It wouldn't have anything to do with NATO putting weapons on over half of Russia's western border pointing at Moscow, would it? It wouldn't happen to have anything to do with a call to get the majority of the remainder of that border into NATO to install more weapons, would it?
Oh trust me, Russia has a BIG say on the outcome of just who can and who can't join NATO. :)
If Russia starts to use a nuke it would be leaked by their leaky generals, especially Valary.
Finland fucking owned Russia and little Ukraine is giving them the business. I don't know why you're fan buying so much.
We don't even know if their missiles worked. We thought they had a professional military with gas and they don't.
This post was edited by Skinned on Jun 3 2022 09:23am