Quote (Sioux @ Jan 2 2022 11:41pm)
The mortality by vaccination rates you can do yourself with the cdcs published data. I know because I tried it and got the same result.
The NYC data came from the NYC covid website
So, how are you determining who's vaccinated?
There are people who took both shots and are infected with covid 14 days after inoculation in the past 6 months (vaccinated)
There are people who took boosters within the past 6 months and are infected with covid (vaccinated)
There are people who took both shots before the past 6 months and are infected with covid 14 days after inoculation (unvaccinated)
There are people who took both shots and are infected with covid within 14 days after inoculation (unvaccinated)
There are people who took the first shot and got infected before their second (unvaccinated)
There are people who took both shots and no longer have an immune response due to no booster (unvaccinated)
?
It's nice that someone can cherry pick 3 counties in SF and compare it to entire states, but the HUGE difference in mortality rates from COVID when comparing California and Texas is a mere .059%. This is calculated from official CDC data starting from 7/1/2021.
Texas - 74,491 deaths out of a population of 29.5 million = .25% mortality rate
California - 75,847 deaths out of a population of 32.23 million = .19% mortality rate
Why would any reasonable person take a vaccine for a virus with such low mortality rates, in which the majority (97% in Italy for example) of deaths are in elder people with comorbidities?
Why mask and lockdown given the diametrically opposite policies in Texas and California but the nearly identical mortality rate?
This post was edited by tugofpeace on Jan 2 2022 10:59pm