how so what next in your delusions?

In science the retraction of one paper is never enough to destroy an entire idea. The RNA world hypothesis is backed up by over a decade of research at this point. One paper being retracted is pretty inconsequential.

"The only saving grace is that we are the ones who discovered and corrected our own errors, and figured out what was going on."

So much for being blinded by belief. It's kind of hard to say that science has an issue when the scientists themselves pointed out the error lol

all by accident because they never where rigorous to begin with so shit paper got published because shit atheist science sole goal is "no God"

now take it up with the guy that said "blinded by our own belief"

What belief were they blinded by specifically? He says it in the article.

you cant figure out who said that? you should figure that out. its kinda important.

the dude kina of remind me of you and how you reason things out.

This post was edited by TiStuff on Dec 27 2021 04:23am

What belief did he say he was blinded by?

o no not like that..........
who said "we where blinded by our own belief" whats his name and who is he

I see you're trying to avoid the question.

I'll just keep asking then. What belief were they blinded by? If you don't answer it's just an admission that you didn't read a single on of your sources.

the burden is on you, you made some claims about what he said, now coff up the answer and prove u had a clue what u where talking about. if u get the answer wrong then ill correct you

who said "we where blinded by our own belief" whats his name and who is he

i dont think you have a clue about it. being how trashy your earlier argument was

Nobel laureate jack szostak. Now answer his question you dummy