dont you have a cnn broadcast to watch?

I'm actually asking. What are your specific issues with peer review? There are definitely problems and would like to hear the thoughts of an esteemed internet researcher such as yourself.

all is not well in the atheist world. the boasters of science.
a naturalistic explanation of life has completely failed and peer review was compromised to push it.
thats what the article is really about.

one could wonder what is the next move of the "atheist" perhaps we already see it? total fascism? remove God and science by sheer force ......

are you an atheist?
are you an antitheist?

This is a lot words saying nothing except a red herring about theism. Can you tell me what you think the issues with peer review are? Like I'll even accept bullet points.

you just saw one instance of total fail not a partial fail but a total and complete fail of peer review and the scientific process. what do you think of that?

Again you're not saying anything specific.

i am not falling for your distraction is your complaint. the article stands on its own merit

it blasts a big hole into your world view. what are you going to do about it?

Asking you to use your own thoughts is a distraction? Like even take your article and summarize it. Give me the 5 word summary.

Honestly peer review held up fairly well in the covid era. There is so garbage posted to biorxiv or medrxiv that never made it to print because it got caught for shoddy work or obvious fraud.

you where not asking for "thoughts" you where asking "What are your specific issues with peer review?"

i already did
Lets Talk Science. More Specificaly "peer Review"

you said" Honestly peer review held up fairly well in the covid era"
(red herring accepted, actually its been total un scientific shit show)(ev1 still hasnt figured out when the pedo gates became a dr)

Man you just can't give a straight answer except to link someone else's thoughts.