d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev18518528538548551273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Dec 26 2021 02:17pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 26 2021 11:47am)
None of what I said is vague in the slightest. You're just dumb.



Buying a coffee isn't a constitutional right, and we don't have documents showing that the people creating the laws are explicitly targeting racial groups with their policy design.


Don't you understand how you people come off?

1) Theory A, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
2) reality proves Theory A wrong
3) Theory B, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
4) reality proves Theory B wrong
Repeat forever

Perhaps it's time to drop deductive reasoning and certitude knowing that this is forever an interative process as real Science always
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 26 2021 02:19pm
Quote (Nibthebarb @ Dec 26 2021 02:17pm)
Don't you understand how you people come off?

1) Theory A, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
2) reality proves Theory A wrong
3) Theory B, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
4) reality proves Theory B wrong
Repeat forever

Perhaps it's time to drop deductive reasoning and certitude knowing that this is forever an interative process as real Science always


Sounds like you don't have a real argument and instead you're triggered that I "come off" the wrong way.

I work in science. I have a better understanding of how its an iterative process than you ever will, which is why I've been right every step of the way and the anti-vaxers have had to continuously lie.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Dec 26 2021 02:35pm
Quote (Nibthebarb @ Dec 26 2021 12:17pm)
Don't you understand how you people come off?

1) Theory A, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
2) reality proves Theory A wrong
3) Theory B, the science is settled, do this. Disagree with me = you don't believe in Science
4) reality proves Theory B wrong
Repeat forever

Perhaps it's time to drop deductive reasoning and certitude knowing that this is forever an interative process as real Science always


you do know science by definition doesn't use deductive reasoning right? It's inductive which is literally the opposite.
Member
Posts: 46,844
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 26 2021 05:20pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 26 2021 11:47am)
None of what I said is vague in the slightest. You're just dumb.



Buying a coffee isn't a constitutional right, and we don't have documents showing that the people creating the laws are explicitly targeting racial groups with their policy design.


why isnt it?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 26 2021 05:23pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 26 2021 05:20pm)
why isnt it?


Because it's not guaranteed in the constitution.

What an incredibly stupid thing to ask. I know you're just a pajeet in a call center but come on.
Member
Posts: 46,844
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 26 2021 05:27pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 26 2021 03:23pm)
Because it's not guaranteed in the constitution.

What an incredibly stupid thing to ask. I know you're just a pajeet in a call center but come on.


its not prohibited in the constitution.

im betting in another time and place you have fiercely defended the right to smoke pot.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 26 2021 05:30pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 26 2021 05:27pm)
its not prohibited in the constitution.

im betting in another time and place you have fiercely defended the right to smoke pot.


Doesn't matter. Constitutional rights are rights that are explicitly granted in the constitution. They are separate from other rights in that they have the highest standard to legislate against.

You can only restrict speech for a very good reason and in a highly specific way. All other rights have a lower standard
Member
Posts: 12,179
Joined: Mar 23 2012
Gold: 7,240.57
Dec 26 2021 05:31pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 26 2021 06:27pm)
its not prohibited in the constitution.

im betting in another time and place you have fiercely defended the right to smoke pot.


The constitution doesn't prohibit me from farting directly onto your face, ergo it is literal fascism if you reeeeeefuse to let me.
Member
Posts: 46,844
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 26 2021 05:36pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 26 2021 03:30pm)
Doesn't matter. Constitutional rights are rights that are explicitly granted in the constitution. They are separate from other rights in that they have the highest standard to legislate against.

You can only restrict speech for a very good reason and in a highly specific way. All other rights have a lower standard


your thinking in the communist mindset while the constitution was written with the liberty mindset. there is nothing in it specifically about coffee so the government should have no business with it.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 26 2021 05:42pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 26 2021 05:36pm)
your thinking in the communist mindset while the constitution was written with the liberty mindset. there is nothing in it specifically about coffee so the government should have no business with it.


No. I'm using the definitions used by our federal courts.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18518528538548551273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll