d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Jan 6 Committee Thread
Prev18485868788225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Dec 16 2021 08:52pm
Schiff is still being viewed as credible? isn't his most prominent donor, Ed Buck - (D), a credibly accused criminal convicted for having multiple minority males wake up dead in his house under questionable (drug overdose) circumstances?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jul/27/ed-buck-democratic-donor-guilty-fatal-meth-overdoses-two-men

we are still waiting on Schiff to produce legitimate proof that he claims he had about 'russia' "hacking the elction" or whatever. did he doctor that stuff too?

This post was edited by excellence on Dec 16 2021 08:53pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Dec 16 2021 09:25pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 16 2021 06:37pm)
Use fucking google.

JK: google blocked the results! Use duckduckgo


Let me get this straight. You think that the additional statement, changes THIS quote:
Quote

On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all


Additional quote.
Quote

— in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence. 'No legislative act,' wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No 78, 'contrary to the Constitution, can be valid'. The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: "That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.' 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).

Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all.


In your words, what fundamentally changes with the additional information?
Member
Posts: 6,700
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 16 2021 09:25pm
But there is a tape of Donald Trump having hookers pee on a bed.

And the tape exists.

And this proves he works for Putin!

And, um… And the tape exists!!!!!!!
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Dec 16 2021 09:28pm
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 16 2021 07:25pm)
But there is a tape of Donald Trump having hookers pee on a bed.

And the tape exists.

And this proves he works for Putin!

And, um… And the tape exists!!!!!!!


ya nice nothing to see here.. except congress members trying to over turn American votes

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Dec 16 2021 09:28pm
Member
Posts: 6,700
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 16 2021 09:29pm
Quote (thundercock @ Dec 16 2021 10:25pm)
Let me get this straight. You think that the additional statement, changes THIS quote:


Additional quote.


In your words, what fundamentally changes with the additional information?



Every democrat talking head : let me give you some context.

Apparently everybody on spooky insurrection Saturday squad: what changes with this context? Nothing leave it out.


It is sad when I call out people as being fucking jokes. I can scam with the best of them.

Member
Posts: 6,700
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 16 2021 09:30pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Dec 16 2021 10:28pm)
ya nice nothing to see here.. except congress members trying to over turn American votes



As has happened in, hmmmmm almost every presidential election in the past two decades.


Lol bro y’all are jokes.


If you sincerely think democracy was in danger you are a fucking moron

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Dec 16 2021 09:30pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Dec 16 2021 09:32pm
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 16 2021 07:30pm)
As has happened in, hmmmmm almost every presidential election in the past two decades.


Lol bro y’all are jokes.


If you sincerely think democracy was in danger you are a fucking moron


I don't but I think those clown would grift this to the bank as the currently are.
You still defend these ass hats who if the COULD of would of overturned it.
because they have 20% of the GOP believing this BS. If you think this shit is harmless you are a bigger moron.
and no this doesn't happen every election. LAWL

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Dec 16 2021 09:32pm
Member
Posts: 6,700
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 16 2021 09:38pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Dec 16 2021 10:32pm)
I don't but I think those clown would grift this to the bank as the currently are.
You still defend these ass hats who if the COULD of would of overturned it.
because they have 20% of the GOP believing this BS. If you think this shit is harmless you are a bigger moron.
and no this doesn't happen every election. LAWL



Really. They don’t object to votes when republicans win?

There weren’t almost twice the objections in 2016 than in 2020?

Lol bruh pull your head out ya fucking ass.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Dec 16 2021 09:39pm
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 16 2021 07:38pm)
Really. They don’t object to votes when republicans win?

There weren’t almost twice the objections in 2016 than in 2020?

Lol bruh pull your head out ya fucking ass.


so please show me congress planning and texting with people to find loopholes in the EC certification.
go
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Dec 16 2021 09:49pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 16 2021 07:29pm)
Every democrat talking head : let me give you some context.

Apparently everybody on spooky insurrection Saturday squad: what changes with this context? Nothing leave it out.


It is sad when I call out people as being fucking jokes. I can scam with the best of them.


No one is saying context isn't important. I'm asking if anything changes with this additional information.

Here, let's try an exercise:

"The gay man enjoyed the dick on his face."

"The gay man enjoyed the dick on his face and achieved an erection. He couldn't wait to wrap his mouth on the throbbing cock."

Is there a fundamental difference between the two when we're talking about a homo enjoying a dick on his face? Of course not.

The reality here is that right wing publications are banking on their readers reading a headline only. They basically think that YOU are too stupid and lazy to read. Doesn't that make you feel bad? I'd be pretty ticked off if someone was effectively calling me a fucking moron to my face.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18485868788225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll