Quote (SBD @ Feb 12 2021 03:42pm)
I am not reading all this back and forth. What is the ultimate argument for not wanting to minimize the risk of passing along COVID-19 to a person in a vulnerable group?
I personally don't need the vaccine. I'm healthy, I'm young, no underlying health issues, etc. But I would want to mitigate the risk of passing it along to someone in a high risk group and if this helps in any way possible I am willing to do it since the downside for me is a sore arm for a day, maybe two.
People are to edgy and hard to think of others calling things natural selection meanwhile if their grandparents passed away from COVID complications they would be in a giant ball of tears and regret.
the thing is, if you're unhealthy at the point of dying of covid then any vaccine may have a stronger chance to kill what's left of your immunity system. you may get immune for 1 disease but weaker for everything else. and then die from the flu.
thats why you shouldn't take any vaccine if you're over 65 and have health problems.
talking about risks versus benefits nobody ever talks about thoses people getting sclerosis few years after a vaccine (hello hepatitis B vaccine), and countless others horrible things.
In a country just like france its 5000+ new cases every year just for this disease than nobody can cure or know where it comes from.
funny how all thoses autoimmunes diseases only appeared since industrial era. For sclerosis it was in the 1830's.
But maybe I'm wrong and the solution is to keep going, have 5g for everyone, round up for everyone and why not some rfid chips in the brain. Thor is already selected naturally.
This post was edited by Melatonina on Feb 12 2021 09:08am