Quote (ferdia @ 17 May 2022 11:22)
curiosity got the better of me, just providing this (pewresearchorg) for context.
https://i.imgur.com/QC4XSOT.pngand also (aljazeera):
What has been the international response to Azov?
In June 2015, both Canada and the United States announced that their own forces will not support or train the Azov regiment, citing its neo-Nazi connections. The following year, however, the US lifted the ban under pressure from the Pentagon. In October 2019, 40 members of the US Congress led by Representative Max Rose signed a letter unsuccessfully calling for the US State Department to designate Azov as a “foreign terrorist organisation” (FTO). Last April, Representative Elissa Slotkin repeated the request – which included other white supremacist groups – to the Biden administration.
Transnational support for Azov has been wide, and Ukraine has emerged as a new hub for the far right across the world. Men from across three continents have been documented to join the Azov training units in order to seek combat experience and engage in similar ideology.
This is missleading: in all countries you will always have like 10% of people who just dont want strangers or communautarists, could be jews, muslims, blacks, arabs, indians, asians, or just "immigrants"
this is a dangerously focused study, they better work back on their countries' views studies but they weirdly stopped some years ago. Maybe the results were not appreacied by some allies (it's US study)
Azov got largely diminished since 2014, you have the informations on wikipedia.
This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 17 2022 09:09am