But to all the smokers, pot users, heroin users, cocaine users ect.

Do you even care about them numbers?

Drug abuse doesn't have exponential growth in a population

woot lockdown 4 coming in Ontario !!!!!!!! woot !!!!! just soon get a goodjob .... fuck this government

Childrens of Smokers are likely to become smokers.

Lets's be cautious and say to every smoker there are 1.1 childrens which are also smokers.

That's exponential growth. qed

doesnt need to be exponential to be a problem:
https://www.drugabuse.gov/drug-topics/opioids/benzodiazepines-opioids





smoking is good for you, smoking carcinogenic compounds is bad for you.
They won when they got you to generalize all smoking as bad instead of bad smoke as just that.

This post was edited by lodd222 on Dec 17 2021 12:26pm

If you make up numbers you can show anything. The actual numbers show smoking has been on the decline for decades



No shit

This post was edited by Sioux on Dec 17 2021 12:27pm

The exponent doesn't have to be >2

I understand how exponential growth works.

If it's all declining, how it comes, that me, my girlfrien, my mother, my father, my sister, my sister's girlfriend are all smokers.

It's addictiting af and you know it

http://libgen.rs/scimag/10.1002%2F%28sici%291097-0061%28199604%2912%3A5%3C501%3A%3Aaid-yea931%3E3.0.co%3B2-u






nicotine and poisons in the paper that when burned make for addictive + harmful smoke.