Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 17 Dec 2021 10:43)
See, thats where we just have to accept reality. It is still racist. We can draw direct lines from racist policies to the ones that still exist. Its not "different outcomes" its literal straight lines across history. The whole reason we have zip code based funding still is because of this. It was made to separate minority kids from funding by whites.
Zip code based funding also hurts poor white regions and cuts them off from funding by affluent-but-diverse urban and suburban areas. Imho, America's current system is predominantly set up to reduce social mobility and entrench class divides, which happens to correlate strongly with race.
Also, almost across the country, we always find a huge disparity in educational outcomes between black and brown children on the one side and children of east asian descent on the other, no matter which school district we look at. Even in deprived, heavily non-white places, Asians outperform their peers (white or non-white) by a substantial margin. So much so that certain woke politicians in NYC/LA/etc. implement explicitly discriminatory policies against them to mask or eliminate this inconvenient fact.
Regarding the inequality which exists as an echo of racist policies of the past, like redlining: the question is how to address this. Ibram X. Kendi and like-minded proponents of CRT are unapologetic in their idea of how to fix it:
Quote (Ibram X. Kendi)
"The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination."
This is of course a highly toxic approach since it would discriminate against poor whites as well as white immigrants who only arrived in the U.S. since, say, the 90s.
My approach therefore would be to implement colorblind policies which help all poor and working-class people irrespective of their race - the overrepresentation of non-whites in these categories means that such policies would automatically have a disproportionate effect on black and brown people and close racial inequality.
I also believe this approach to be better politics. Just compare the primary performance of "labor Bernie" in 2016 with that of "woke Bernie" in 2020: the first time around, he was able to mount a very strong and durable challenge to a candidate which had the overwhelming support of the party elites and the media since the start of the campaign. During his second run, he got a headstart against a highly fractured field, but was quickly blown out of the water anyway as soon as the party establishment coalesced around a single candidate.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 17 2021 06:49am