makes sense you rage here but wont contend with the links i offer
"no masks"
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=84140232&f=27

u all pissed off CNN took a dump on masks?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 2 2022 03:05am

Well it doesn't do that either, and they're making everyone do it, not just "the infected"

You mistakenly believe that everyone who has something to say that is not in absolute agreement with your personal framework of reference is "raging" or "leftie" or "REEEEE", whatever that is.
As I said before, I am not going to re-invent the wheel for you. We have had our discussion in that thread a few months ago and you were equally unable to produce any source from an academic platform, and instead threw bitchute video upon bitchute video upon bitchute video at me (and pretty much everyone else).

I'm not sure if your question is rhetorical, but I'll answer it anyway. No, I am not pissed off at what CNN says about masks. CNN is not an academic platform. I hardly follow the news because it is an interpretation of things rather than the representation of science. I know CNN is considered "left" by a lot of people (and it might be, I don't know), and it's pretty well known that I am hinging towards political left I suppose, but it is a very wrong and narrow-minded assumption that every "leftie" watches CNN. As for news platforms, the only one I sometimes watch is Fox News. That shit is better than comedy and Americans are hilarious in that they call that platform a news platform.

/e

It does do that, see evidence I have posted. If you are still denying the efficacy of face masks, you are being willfully ignorant.
The reason for "everyone" doing it is well-explained by authorities.

This post was edited by Leeevee on Jan 2 2022 04:20am

should i keep reading the rant of a mask zombie ?..................naw

So as soon as an argument becomes too difficult or someone points out the many flaws in your reasoning, they are ranting mask zombies and their content not worth reading?
TiStuff: "HERE IS MY OPINION NOW TALK TO THE HAND BYEEEEEEEE"

Since you tend to bash on political views, .... is this what being politically "right" has come down to? I guess you're a Trump voter..

maybe later
truth of the mask
"no masks"
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=84140232&f=27

If you review the evidence and come to conclude that masks do not work, you lack the capacity to sit at the table to discuss policies. Go get an education first.

this woman says your played
Dr Merritt: Face Masks Don't Work! You're Either Being Paid or Played!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vpffR07rUn87/

and i am at the table
"no masks"
https://forums.d2jsp.org/forum.php?f=168

your here, off topic, hiding. probably trying to get the thread closed for off topic, a fraud leftie kind of play.

elites dont wear masks. thats for the peasants. maybe you can get a cuck mask job. like the chump holding AOC dress?
BLM arrested for protesting outside of where the elites gathered
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k95h00G5l8c/
0:35 super rich whyte in the fore front with the mask servants in the back (one of them is black)
1:32 AOC "tax the rich dress" laughing about it with a masked up servant holding up her dress so she can walk.

laughing at you
0:35 dress says "equal rights" servants in masks

laughing at you
1:32 "tax the rich" dress, mask servant holding dress


This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 2 2022 08:01am

1) Check your spelling, but apart from that, 1 person saying a thing on a non-academic platform remains the same kind of evidence as is discussed prior to this post: absolutely meaningless.
2) Having a Dr title in a bogus platform video/article/whatever doesn't mean you're a Dr. Anyone can write Dr in front of their name regardless of whether or not it contains and truth to it. And even if they do have the necessary paperwork the carry the title, having the title does not make you competent. Quite a few homeopaths in Belgium have studied medicine prior to studying homeopathy and yet it is a career that is frowned upon from a scientific point of view, for the simple reason that it has been disproven of being therapeutic in any sense beyond a placebo effect.
3) I know you're at the table, that's what I'm trying to say: you're partaking in a dialogue for which you miss the essential knowledge. I am not one to exclude anyone from conversation for as long as they know and acknowledge their limitations. I'm sure you have knowledge and/or skills and/or potential that I will never possess, but science begins with the recognition that one does not know something and you sorely suck at admitting to not being knowledgeable in the biomedical field. For all I care you're Trump himself, but you've proven to know jack fucking shit about anything related to biology, health care or science.
4) How am I talking off-topic? This is about face masks. I am discussing face mask efficacy with you. Are you trying to change the subject at hand (as always) because you can no longer add to the conversation?
5) I fail to see how I am hiding, but enlighten me. I might learn something. What do I do or say that makes you think I am here, "hiding"?
6) Assumption based on thin air. I do not mind this thread. I know that I would sooner fly a pig raised by a smurf than I would convince you of anything, but there might be third parties that read our conversation and open their eyes to reliable sources of information instead of clinging on to their beliefs that may be incorrect.
7) Dragging in politics again, eh. You haven't got many other insults up your sleeve, have you? At least if you disregard me because of my political stance, do so at the right time so that the insult actually makes sense. Diverting from the subject by "hiding" or trying to shut off opponent's platforms (i.e. censorship) is something the extreme right does as well, and, to my experience, to a MUCH larger degree than the extreme left. Your insult is hypocricy at its finest, from my perspective anyway.
8) How in the fuck do you suddenly see dragging BLM shit into this conversation as a logical, sensible step to progress with your argument. This looks very hard at another frantic attempt to flee from the actual conversation we're having, which is about face masks. Don't make this about BLM. Stick with face masks. You can do it!
9) I work in health care. I wear glasses, trust me when I say I fucking hate face masks in my life. Regardless, they have a well-established effect in reducing the infectivity rate and so I will wear them responsibly and adequately. I'll be the first one to take it off every time I leave my work space though.
10) The law (at least in Belgium) has plenty of ways to enforce masks without infringing on human rights. I'm not sure what you're trying to say. If this is an attempt to call the use of face masks an act against human rights, you're dead wrong and are apparently also not very schooled in law, at least assuming your laws are not radically different on that aspect in comparison to west-Europe.
11) What's wrong with taxing the rich? o.o

"Check your spelling" as far as i got, tells me everything
so good job pedant
use what u deem necessary to stay blind. your perfect for the hold AOC dress job. congrats

you think your precious peer review is incorruptible? thats pretty naive

Lets Talk Science. More Specificaly "peer Review"
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85705074&f=90