i would edit this in, but i just found it and i can't.
smaller video, but the audio is good on this one.

Posting in a topic where people can't handle the truth.

what truth is that? you are aware of the "truth" you pretend to know right?

Sauci knows the "truth". that being that Wisconsin makes superior cheese and wine to France.

A very entertaining watch

if that's the "truth", i'm not much of a denier here.

the jimmydore video covering that is pretty good.

-------------------------------------

i still plan to point out key parts of the first hearing, but i'm going to watch through it again before i do. i also plan to cover the executive summary in the near future of the IG's report.

here are some points in the first half of the video worth watching. (i'm mostly picking these points because MSM coverage is dishonest, and focusing on certain things)
i'm using the second video listed. the audio and video is a bit out of sync, but the audio is clear unlike the first video.

woods procedure (part of executive summary)
18:10-18:55

separation of the "opening" of Crossfire-Hurricane (1 person Bill Priestap) and "EVERY ONE" else.
+evidence of political bias
22:28-22:50
23:55-24:51

accountability
20:35-20:54

motivation uncertain
41:10-42:12

bias found during investigation
43:55-44:10
45:06-45:44

edit:
also adding an order released by the FISC yesterday.

https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/MIsc%2019%2002%20191217.pdf

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Dec 18 2019 03:32pm

One ask for investigation of an investigation; output is NOPE, nothing special, then what ? One decides to investigate the investigators of the investigators because output does not fits his needs.

All we got here is not very smart people* getting even moar not very smart people* because google, youtube, or "social" medias are delivering all the material they want to reinforce their preconceived ideas.
Such a wonderful era.

*personal note: "dumbfucks" should be used with parsimony.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Dec 18 2019 03:40pm

what did you even write? that's supposed to be "truth"?
that's not even english.

edit:
i also wonder how you believe pointing out "specific time-stamps in testimonial hearings" is anywhere near "googling a perspective".

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Dec 18 2019 03:49pm

This is not a discussion this is just guys digging their own holes separately.