#1 is false. We have plenty of transitional fossils. This also ignores the statement that every species born was the same species as its parent. Just horrible understanding of evolution.

#2 Is not proof against Evolution. It's not even evidence against evolution at all.

#3 Same as #1. Lack of transitional fossils does not disprove evolution in the slightest

#4 Literally the exact same as #1

#5 Out of context quote. Same as #1

#6 Yet another gross misunderstanding of evolution. Also an untrue statement. See. Rabbits.

#7 Again. False, poor understanding of evolution. See Cambrian.

#8 Its the exact same statement in 7. You just made two points out of one statement. You're only 7 attempts in and already doubling up.

#9 The same statement of 7...again. This time with an out of context Dawkins quote.

#10 Of course you can't observe macro evolution in a lifetime. The time it takes for it to occur is obscenely long. Thats just a dumb statement.

#11 Same as number 10.

#12 Out of context quote...again trying to make the statement that no observed changes means evolution did not occur.

#13 Not an argument anymore than me saying religion is poison because I said so is an argument.

#14 The only people that claim this to be true are creationists.

#15 It's not that hard to conceive. Even if it was one chance in 50 billion, after several billion years its still possible to happen.

#16 That's not an argument against evolution. It's a question for evolution.

#17 Thats...again, not an argument against evolution. Discovering a species thought extinct is a cool thing, not a hammerblow to evolution

#18 Another lack of understanding of evolution. Just because it CAN doesn't mean it WILL

#19 Not an argument at all.

#20 Again...not an argument. Evolutionists have long mentioned the gaps in fossil records. It's kind of hard to dig up millions of years worth of things. Try it sometime

#21 Um...Lucy. I don't need to say anything else.

#22 Not part of evolution. Thats physics

#23 Again physics not evolution. But the simple answer is....this is why life is on Earth on not somewhere else.

#24 He made the statement because it's true....Whats so impossible about it?

#25 Thats again not evidence against evolution....Saying that two different species have different DNA is....I don't even know why you would think thats an argument against evolution.

#26 The word creation is a false statement. Not an argument. Short answer. Mutation. There is plenty of evidence of increases in genetic information. See Down Syndrome

#27 Thats easily explainable with basic geology knowledge. Shifting occurs regularly. However I am not a geologist so I will defer to someone with more knowledge here.

#28 Not an argument. Saying "That doesn't make sense," just has no bearing in a scientific argument.

#29 Preservation. Not hard to conceive again.

#30 Asking a question about evolution does not disprove it.

#31 Same as 30

#32 Same as 30

#33 Same as 30

#34 Slowly and painfully. Mixtures of changes in the body that react differently. Again. Not an argument against evolution

#35 Saying something is too absurd is not an argument

#36 No idea why a "riddle" is an argument against evolution. The riddle also has wrong theories about evolution

#37 Not an argument against evolution

#38 Again....why is this relevant to evolution?

#39 Quoting a creationist who works in agriculture. Lol. Just a joke of an argument.

#40 Again....no. Not an argument.

#41 False. Anyone can be involved in the scientific community. Theories are disproven all the time. Not an argument against evolution

#42 "The fossil record is sparse" Is not evidence against evolution. In fact if anything it's evidence against creationism.

#43 Quoting one philosophers opinion that evolution is a joke is not evidence against evolution.

#44 Hence "Theory"

This post was edited by Impose on Dec 9 2016 02:45am

Do you to have a glimpse of what will happen of the day of judgement? Learn from this story. A Catholic man dies and finds out by Jesus Christ that Catholicism leads straight to Hell for eternity.

High-level production, clearly

I didn't know Stephen Hawking narrated this sort of crackpot shit

other, Satan

Sometimes you don't even need to look at the video to see what is going on. Even if you just look at the poster it presents before you click play.

Everything the man said was rebuked by scripture. There was nothing he could say that would save him. That is the very thing, he tried to save himself but he couldn't.

The masses could not save him. Only Jesus can save. If you try to save yourself like this man did then you need to look no further than what happened to this man to see where your future will be.

I want you to really think about that. The Bible doesn't sugarcoat it, it will tell you straight up the way things are. It will be very confronting and it will challenge your life's beliefs like it did this man. The only difference is that it is not too late for you to change your mind, only those who are still living can do that.

Which part of the bible should I ignore then?

Heed these words:

Revelation 22:18-19

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll."

You didn't answer my question.