Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 10 2022 12:23pm)
1. By "risking direct conflict" I don't see a clear affirmation of world war, not to mention it's half of a joke since we give Ukraine alot of weapons, money, heavy vehicles, intelligence. And still not WW3. Finally WW would involve several different countries on both sides, ATM it's only Russia vs everyone else.
2. Nato was the best excuse for doing war crime and mass destruction. Along with nazis
3. Once again you are doing a "butt both sides"
4. Usual HyperCriticism trick, no thanks.
Im off this "discussion" thanks.
ok i will try one last time. you dont have to reply positively, i dont mind:
1. if the US and Nato think its a bad idea to have nato troops in ukraine, they probably have a good reason.
2. your words are literally implying that russia is committing war crimes because nato made them/because nazi's made them. no war crimes are simply committed, in war. any party that tries to make excuses for war crimes, is at fault.
3. If is a fact that China is trying to buy itself into a better position, in africa and asia. it is a fact that America has been doing this as well for decades around the globe. Russia using bribes to prop up pro russian governments before and after the collapse of the USSR is also a fact. now there was another user in this thread that referred to this bothsidism / took affront when policies were compared. I am sorry you dont like it when ppl provide comparison. it is what it is, noting it is in fact, a comparison, albeit not an equal comparison. if i had to choose between the US and russia, i would choose the US.
4. you posted the picture of the poisoned politician. i agreed he was poisoned by pro russians. i asked if you could dig any further info.
again, i really dont see how the above is sending you away from discussing.
This post was edited by ferdia on May 10 2022 06:50am