I will say it another way then:

1. [ note that this was previously stated in this topic ] The US and Nato have made a point of not putting troops into a country (Ukraine) that Russia is at war with, as to do so would risk a direct conflict between nato and russian forces from which it may be very difficult to withdraw from. With communication between the 2 sides being at an all time low, and neither side respecting the others concerns/interests, the west would be mad to put a sizeable Nato presence in Ukraine. This is my view, and this is also the view held by America and Nato. you do not have to agree with me on this.
2. Yes but it was Nato.
3. Russia spending money on bribes is no worse then what the US or China is currently doing. thats called MO.
4. Point 4 related to any information you might be able to acquire/find relating to who poisoned him and why.

1. By "risking direct conflict" I don't see a clear affirmation of world war, not to mention it's half of a joke since we give Ukraine alot of weapons, money, heavy vehicles, intelligence. And still not WW3. Finally WW would involve several different countries on both sides, ATM it's only Russia vs everyone else.
2. Nato was the best excuse for doing war crime and mass destruction. Along with nazis
3. Once again you are doing a "butt both sides"
4. Usual HyperCriticism trick, no thanks.

Im off this "discussion" thanks.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 10 2022 05:25am

Details about 79th brigade ZSU

You're nuts.

NATO is to blaim. All proof is out there, I already posted sources. Sucks for you eh

There is a up and coming NATO in the East.

It's all "out there" like farts.

0:57 - 1:07

Look nutjob, no one is interested in your feelings, this is about international politics and proof of what lead up to this is out there cuz history has neatly recorded it all so to speak

I'm sorry that Russia crushed your feelies ok. Cya

Like i said, the best you can do is to pickup youtube videos and change the title following your beliefs.

It is quite difficult to speak or have discussion with people who base their arguments and debates on Dogmatic principles.
They allow passion and emotion to control their train of thoughts which will end up at times being look upon as someone with superiority complex although they mean no harm.

I know this is a bad analogy but , it is akin to telling a Muslim in the middle east why allowing women to drive cars without a chaperone can be quite beneficial to society and helpful to a family.