d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev17697707717727731273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,089
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 9 2021 06:58pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 02:27pm)
Oh look, even lower death rate than Israel... wonder if it has anything to do with the high vaccination rate :huh:


vermont has a lower vaccination rate than israel and you say they have a lower death rate?. also you need to give links with your data ty

Quote (Sioux @ Dec 9 2021 04:26pm)
Insurance companies literally do charge smokers a higher premium.


it will be interesting how the insurance companies balance out as more data comes in "vax"/un"vax"
Member
Posts: 1,468
Joined: Nov 28 2018
Gold: 20,797.30
Dec 9 2021 07:04pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 07:24pm)
Yeah... and how does that tie to the efficacy of the vaccines?

If the vaccines did nothing there would be no need to change premiums, whether it be raising premiums overall because they can't target individuals or raising on individuals if they could do so.


Unfortunately we probably won't ever know the efficacy of the vaccines for many reasons. The biggest ones off the top of my head would be because it is heavily politicized which creates conflict on its own, and the collection of data is flawed. Not to mention the dreaded natural immunity factor. Which I personally believe in having contracted covid in November of last year and have been knowingly and extensively exposed to it in August this year and again in late October this year, and tested negative both times. Also, I have relatives in the medical field one being a respiratory therapist and said not that she is doing a hard count of vaxed and unvaxed but it seems to be close in ratio as to who is being admitted.
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Dec 9 2021 07:08pm
Quote (TiStuff @ 9 Dec 2021 16:58)
vermont has a lower vaccination rate than israel and you say they have a lower death rate?. also you need to give links with your data ty


I never said they had a lower vaccination rate, they have a higher vaccination rate than Israel.

Vermont death count: 426
Vermont population: 623,989
Deaths per/100k: 68.3
Vermont full vaccination percentage: 76%

Israel full vaccination percentage: 62.8%



https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
https://www.healthvermont.gov/covid-19/vaccine/covid-19-vaccine-dashboard
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=OWID_WRL
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Dec 9 2021 07:10pm
Quote (OoSPACEoO @ 9 Dec 2021 17:04)
Unfortunately we probably won't ever know the efficacy of the vaccines for many reasons. The biggest ones off the top of my head would be because it is heavily politicized which creates conflict on its own, and the collection of data is flawed. Not to mention the dreaded natural immunity factor. Which I personally believe in having contracted covid in November of last year and have been knowingly and extensively exposed to it in August this year and again in late October this year, and tested negative both times. Also, I have relatives in the medical field one being a respiratory therapist and said not that she is doing a hard count of vaxed and unvaxed but it seems to be close in ratio as to who is being admitted.


Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much, also even if the admissions were equal and say 70% of the population were vaccinated, that would mean 30% of the population are accounting for 50% of admissions.
Member
Posts: 1,468
Joined: Nov 28 2018
Gold: 20,797.30
Dec 9 2021 07:19pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 08:10pm)
Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much, also even if the admissions were equal and say 70% of the population were vaccinated, that would mean 30% of the population are accounting for 50% of admissions.


Lol...it does to the person it pertains to. Also, you can throw percentages around all you want. They mean nothing when the data is corrupted.

This post was edited by OoSPACEoO on Dec 9 2021 07:20pm
Member
Posts: 36,937
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 48,650.00
Dec 9 2021 07:21pm
The one thing covid vaxxers and covid anti-vaxxers have in common is neither are fully vaccinated.
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Dec 9 2021 07:22pm
Quote (OoSPACEoO @ 9 Dec 2021 17:19)
Lol...it does to the person it pertains to. Also, you can throw percentages around all you want. They mean nothing when the data is corrupted.


Tell me you don't understand statistics without telling me you don't understand statistics.
Member
Posts: 1,468
Joined: Nov 28 2018
Gold: 20,797.30
Dec 9 2021 07:31pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 08:10pm)
Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much, also even if the admissions were equal and say 70% of the population were vaccinated, that would mean 30% of the population are accounting for 50% of admissions.


Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 08:22pm)
Tell me you don't understand statistics without telling me you don't understand statistics.


If you're claimed percentages were correct, why does it contradict the CDC websites own stats. The CDC website states that the covid vaccine is 94.1 % effective against contracting covd, but your 70% vaxed accounting for 50% of hospital emissions are very far off that 94.1% .

Tell me you're not blowing smoke out your ass without blowing smoke out your ass
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Dec 9 2021 07:37pm
Quote (OoSPACEoO @ 9 Dec 2021 17:31)
If you're claimed percentages were correct, why does it contradict the CDC websites own stats. The CDC website states that the covid vaccine is 94.1 % effective against contracting covd, but your 70% vaxed accounting for 50% of hospital emissions are very far off that 94.1% .

Tell me you're not blowing smoke out your ass without blowing smoke out your ass


I was using a hypothetical number to show how your anecdote does not show that the vaccines are ineffective, even if the anecdote was representative of the actual hospitalization numbers.

As for the actual numbers? CDC numbers could be off, especially given emergence and prevalence of new/different strains. I mean even then with statistics the values are always going to have some margin of error, but I'd imagine the issue with wherever you are getting that 94.1% number is you misinterpreting data and what the statistic is supposedly conveying.
Member
Posts: 1,468
Joined: Nov 28 2018
Gold: 20,797.30
Dec 9 2021 08:01pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Dec 9 2021 08:37pm)
I was using a hypothetical number to show how your anecdote does not show that the vaccines are ineffective, even if the anecdote was representative of the actual hospitalization numbers.

As for the actual numbers? CDC numbers could be off, especially given emergence and prevalence of new/different strains. I mean even then with statistics the values are always going to have some margin of error, but I'd imagine the issue with wherever you are getting that 94.1% number is you misinterpreting data and what the statistic is supposedly conveying.


There is a margin of error across the board. In regards to the data itself, the collection of data, and the calculation of data. So the true efficacy will never be known as previously stated. Combine that with political motives and investors pushing for the maximum return on their investment and the true efficacy will be never be know and always debated. I imagine the issue is you not accepting that corruption can take precedence in a highly political and lucrative issue.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17697707717727731273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll