I dont understand; Your gov, your congress... And your senate are in full republican mode ??!!

And they cant even manage to even initiate an investigation ? (i means a serious one, like trumptingates)

SINCE 10 MONTHS SOON ?

Let me know whats wrong please ?

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

Oh wait...

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

FALSE


--------------


Now go back on topic...

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 30 2017 04:35pm

Even if Trump is a puppet for Russia, a country that would prefer a weaker America, I'm glad. They saved us from a competent leader with a scary name.

Seriously, you're gonna pull up an article from a nobody source, that's as old as dirt?

old as dirt.. old as dirt... say that for yourself please
----------------
Updated [17 October 2017]: Added synopsis of new reportage by The Hill.
----------------

Probably the only one you believe doesn't cause autism and yet evidence seems to suggest otherwise.

Still BS...we have DOJ documents...not Snopes BS.

The DOJ just removed the gag order from the FBI informant (eyewitness). All this and the Senate Judiciary Committee investigation has happened SINCE that...er...update to the Snopes article.

I don't know how YOU govt. works, but here we go by the Senate actions and DOJ documents...rather than some lame Snopes BS. :/


/e




Maybe you two geniuses would understand if you had kept up on what's happening. ^^



/ee One of many articles...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/10/25/doj-lifts-gag-order-fbi-informant-discuss-uranium-deal-congress/801485001/

This post was edited by Ghot on Oct 30 2017 04:51pm

well...



"In truth and in fact, however, and as set forth above, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for the first time on or about March 14, 2016, after defendant PAPADOPOULOS had already learned he would be a foreign policy advisor for the Campaign; the Professor showed interest in defendant PAPADOPOULOS only after learning of his role on the Campaign; and the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the Russians possessing" dirt" on then-candidate Clinton in late April 2016, more than a month after defendant PAPADOPOULOS had joined the Campaign."

the "Professor" only showed interest in Papadopoulos after it became known that he was employed by the Trump campaign.
That. Is. A. Very. Big. Deal.


Damn sounds like a

Why? We've known about this for some time:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-campaign-emails-show-aides-repeated-efforts-to-set-up-russia-meetings/2017/08/14/54d08da6-7dc2-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html

The white house provided those documents to the Mueller investigation themselves, and it shows that the Trump campaign rejected the idea of meeting with the Russians:

Yeah, if we just pretend we didn't read the part about the Professor telling Papadopolous he had "dirt" on Clinton. Which sort of proves what is being said in the USAToday article I linked above.
But don't let yet another fact point you in the direction of the damage that already has been done.

Instead, let it lead you in the wrong direction. The direction that the Dems involved...want you to look. You honestly don't see that the whole Trump-Russia collusion thing is just a smoke screen?
There is NO evidence other than the Dems accusing Trump...yet there are mounting piles of evidence against the Dems and the Obama administration.

a member of trump team lied, why ?


----------------
https://www.ouest-france.fr/monde/etats-unis/etats-unis-enquete-russe-est-ce-le-debut-des-vrais-ennuis-pour-donald-trump-5348770

Ouest-France "takes stock" with journalist Susan Milligan, a journalist specializing in American politics.




The White House seems to downplay Papadopoulos' role in the campaign and in turn accuses Hillary Clinton. Is this a good line of defense?

They try to diversion. I imagine it will work with Donald Trump's diehard supporters who think that Hillary Clinton is evil and Donald Trump is a victim. But the president is losing allies, even within his base, so I do not know how long it will work.

If he continues to be unable to keep his campaign promises, his supporters will be less inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.







What can we expect for the rest of Robert Mueller's investigation?

I think - and almost everyone thinks the same - that there will be more charges. Clearly, Mueller is just beginning. These first charges will serve as leverage to collect more compromising information, passing agreements (reduction of sentence or immunity, Ed).

As for who else will be charged ... My first guess is Michael Flynn (the former Trump National Security Advisor, Ed). What would really destabilize Trump would be an indictment of one of his family members, like Jared Kushner (his step-son and advisor, married to Ivanka Trump, Ed).




Can today's announcements be seen as a step towards the removal of Donald Trump?

Yes, I think Donald Trump has made a very bad start - there are even very serious people who are speculating on his mental health. So yes, this is a turning point towards its decline.


----------

wow this Susan Milligan isnt affraid

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 30 2017 05:21pm