d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev16496506516526531275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 9 2021 11:15am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 9 Sep 2021 14:55)
How much is it impacting the spread? According to the CDC and WHO, those who've been vaccinated can still spread the virus. Likewise, at 88% efficacy vs the Delta, if 7.5 Billion people all got the vaccine, 900 million could still end up not only with the virus, but impacted by severe complications up to and including death.

You're speaking in odd generalities without providing any specific numbers.


Vaccinated = less symptomes = less spread. Shocking.

If you cant accept that vaccination (globally) reduce a disease (vaccinable) spread well: seek help. Thats the last thing you have to do.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Sep 9 2021 11:17am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 9 Sep 2021 10:15)
Vaccinated = less symptomes = less spread. Shocking.

If you cant accept that vaccination (globally) reduce a disease (vaccinable) spread well: seek help. Thats the last thing you have to do.


So your answer is that you have no data. Gotcha. Well, being that I'm not anti-science, I'll stick with the actual data.

So when you have data showing just what impact vaccinated vs unvaccinated has on the spread, come on back. Until then, quiet, there are adults talking. :)
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 9 2021 11:18am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Sep 9 2021 12:15pm)
Vaccinated = less symptomes = less spread. Shocking.

If you cant accept that vaccination (globally) reduce a disease (vaccinable) spread well: seek help. Thats the last thing you have to do.


people seem hung up on the "but i can still spread it" point.

smallpox vaccines were only 95% effective.

polio vaccines were forced on school children without parental consent.

and yet antivaxxers use polio and smallpox vaccines as an example of what covid vaccines should be. its a sad case of cherry picking.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 9 2021 12:17pm)
So your answer is that you have no data. Gotcha. Well, being that I'm not anti-science, I'll stick with the actual data.

So when you have data showing just what impact vaccinated vs unvaccinated has on the spread, come on back. Until then, quiet, there are adults talking. :)


you already provided it. the vaccines are 88% effective and avoidance of delta.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 9 2021 11:19am
Member
Posts: 10,980
Joined: May 30 2019
Gold: 167.69
Warn: 10%
Sep 9 2021 11:23am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Sep 9 2021 06:15pm)
Vaccinated = less symptomes = less spread. Shocking.

If you cant accept that vaccination (globally) reduce a disease (vaccinable) spread well: seek help. Thats the last thing you have to do.


imagine still being so vocal about covid, yet in September2021, almost 2 years after virus' breakout, you're unaware of asymptomatic cases.
you should seriously find another topic to be active in. my little pony or whatever you obese virgins are into

Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Sep 9 2021 11:32am
Quote (thesnipa @ 9 Sep 2021 10:18)
you already provided it. the vaccines are 88% effective and avoidance of delta.


No, that's 88% effective in not becoming sick with Delta. But the vaccinated, according to the CDC and WHO can still spread the virus without expressing symptoms. Likewise, according to the WHO and CDC, asymptomatic spread exists for covid.

So, the realistic thing to do here is simply admit, "We don't know what impact, if any, the vaccine has on spread of the virus, because we have no real data regarding asymptomatic spread."

But, people pushing a political narrative seldom wish to admit ignorance when they demand people do something those people don't wish to do. :)
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 9 2021 11:37am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 9 2021 12:32pm)
No, that's 88% effective in not becoming sick with Delta. But the vaccinated, according to the CDC and WHO can still spread the virus without expressing symptoms. Likewise, according to the WHO and CDC, asymptomatic spread exists for covid.

So, the realistic thing to do here is simply admit, "We don't know what impact, if any, the vaccine has on spread of the virus, because we have no real data regarding asymptomatic spread."

But, people pushing a political narrative seldom wish to admit ignorance when they demand people do something those people don't wish to do. :)


so we can't say that something that drastically reduces my chances to get covid will then drastically reduce my chance to have covid, and then spread covid?

it just seems like that unless u are given the aggregate score of 10 different years long academic studies you cant admit the above. which seems odd.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Sep 9 2021 11:43am
Quote (thesnipa @ 9 Sep 2021 10:37)
so we can't say that something that drastically reduces my chances to get covid will then drastically reduce my chance to have covid, and then spread covid?

it just seems like that unless u are given the aggregate score of 10 different years long academic studies you cant admit the above. which seems odd.


No, the statement was simple, "You have no data or information regarding what impact being vaccinated has on the spread of Covid." And that is 100% accurate. You do not.

Let's get back to the original quote I was responding to:

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 9 Sep 2021 07:04)
- Refusing to get vaccinated is impacting the spread, especially when masks and distance restrictions are not easy to apply.


Once again, the CDC and WHO have clearly stated that Asymptomatic spread is possible, and the vaccine does not prevent you from being a carrier and spreading the virus.

So, my question is simple, "Where's the data indicating vaccines have any impact whatsoever on the spread of the virus?"

If you want to reorient the discussion around, "Well, you'll be 88% less likely to get sick from it" that's a "who gives a shit?" Because if people would rather get sick than take medicine, that's their choice. They have bodily autonomy. No, the argument is on your impact on others. And based on the very advice of the CDC and WHO, we have no data or verifiable evidence that the vaccine limits the spread in any way. So, those who want to have the chance to avoid getting sick from the virus should probably vaccine up. But based on the limited data we have at this time, there is absolutely no reason to claim some kind of virtue that you're "preventing the spread". :)
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 9 2021 11:48am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 9 2021 12:43pm)
No, the statement was simple, "You have no data or information regarding what impact being vaccinated has on the spread of Covid." And that is 100% accurate. You do not.

Let's get back to the original quote I was responding to:



Once again, the CDC and WHO have clearly stated that Asymptomatic spread is possible, and the vaccine does not prevent you from being a carrier and spreading the virus.

So, my question is simple, "Where's the data indicating vaccines have any impact whatsoever on the spread of the virus?"

If you want to reorient the discussion around, "Well, you'll be 88% less likely to get sick from it" that's a "who gives a shit?" Because if people would rather get sick than take medicine, that's their choice. They have bodily autonomy. No, the argument is on your impact on others. And based on the very advice of the CDC and WHO, we have no data or verifiable evidence that the vaccine limits the spread in any way. So, those who want to have the chance to avoid getting sick from the virus should probably vaccine up. But based on the limited data we have at this time, there is absolutely no reason to claim some kind of virtue that you're "preventing the spread". :)


it appears you're laser focused on the individual. likely an ego extension of yourself. what % chance does the vaccine have for ME to spread it if I get vaccinated, in essence.

vaccines are not strictly designed for the individual, they're designed for populations. spread itself is also a metric for populations, not the individual.

in any case ur decreased chance to get it directly applies to your chance to spread it in the context of a population.

to your favor if vaccines decrease symptoms its possible people will be asymptomatic and more likely to spread the disease if they get a breakthrough, but we're talking about small tweaks of percents in comparison to a drastic percent less likelihood u get it at all if vaccinated. so it comes off like u framed the conversation just to make a point where the closer is "we dont know". bit odd.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 9 2021 11:50am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 9 Sep 2021 17:43)
Once again, the CDC and WHO have clearly stated that Asymptomatic spread is possible, and the vaccine does not prevent you from being a carrier and spreading the virus.

So, my question is simple, "Where's the data indicating vaccines have any impact whatsoever on the spread of the virus?"

If you want to reorient the discussion around, "Well, you'll be 88% less likely to get sick from it" that's a "who gives a shit?" Because if people would rather get sick than take medicine, that's their choice. They have bodily autonomy. No, the argument is on your impact on others. And based on the very advice of the CDC and WHO, we have no data or verifiable evidence that the vaccine limits the spread in any way. So, those who want to have the chance to avoid getting sick from the virus should probably vaccine up. But based on the limited data we have at this time, there is absolutely no reason to claim some kind of virtue that you're "preventing the spread". :)


It's not "0" or "1", you cannot introduce doubt and then refute everything like climate change, it will not be as easy;

- Being vaccinated decrease symptoms (or viral load) by alot, and so on spread.
- You can be disagree but at this point it's an important news: Million(s) doctors on this planet need to informed quickly about your new discovery...
- Oh and also 200+ years of Medical History to re-write.

So you pack all that in your mini-bag and take the long lonely road.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Sep 9 2021 11:54am
Quote (thesnipa @ 9 Sep 2021 10:48)
it appears you're laser focused on the individual. likely an ego extension of yourself. what % chance does the vaccine have for ME to spread it if I get vaccinated, in essence.

vaccines are not strictly designed for the individual, they're designed for populations. spread itself is also a metric for populations, not the individual.

in any case ur decreased chance to get it directly applies to your chance to spread it in the context of a population.

to your favor if vaccines decrease symptoms its possible people will be asymptomatic and more likely to spread the disease if they get a breakthrough, but we're talking about small tweaks of percents in comparison to a drastic percent less likelihood u get it at all if vaccinated. so it comes off like u framed the conversation just to make a point where the closer is "we dont know". bit odd.


A mandate impacts individual bodily autonomy. There's no ego extension here. We're talking about violating the rights of all the individuals regarding their bodily autonomy. You have a right to determine what is inserted into your body. A forced vaccine is simply rape by another name.

Once again, Covid is not the virus. Covid is the disease. SARS-CoV2 is the virus. There is zero evidence that people cannot be carriers of the virus because they're vaccinated. There's zero evidence that people cannot spread the virus without developing the disease (respiratory infection). That is literally what "asymptomatic spread" means.

Thus, there is ZERO EVIDENCE that the vaccine has ANY impact on the spread. None. Zero. So if there's no evidence that the vaccine impacts the spread, why would any form of vaccine mandate, vaccine passport, or any other such nonsense be wanted or even helpful?

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 9 Sep 2021 10:50)
- Oh and also 200+ years of Medical History to re-write.


You're saying the CDC and WHO are wrong? What data do you have to that effect? And mRNA vaccines have not seen 200 years of trials.

It's okay that you're a science denier, sauci. I'm not particularly concerned about that. I'd just like you to exercise a bit of critical thought here.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Sep 9 2021 11:56am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16496506516526531275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll