Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 15 2019 05:42pm)
"The smoking gun evidence."
Riiiiiiiiiiight. There's been nothing so far.
not my fault you don't understand english.
Maybe the Roger Stone conviction can shed some light upon the myriad of Republican Propaganda you seem to be following.
The transcript is all the evidence needed. It is an official document. everythign else is literally just confirming what the transcript said. That is how you build a case. Maybe you should read about practicing law before blindly listening to Repub shit and typing lol.
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 15 2019 06:12pm)
Someone explain to a pleb like me, pls
Why did they keep asking her about her feelings and how this is affecting her personal life/family? I'm confused as to what this has to do with anything?
When there is potentially a Jury (or Supreme court panel) that will be deliberating - It is important like in any case to establish the character of the witness to help establish reasoning and credibility to their testimony. This is typical stuff.
Quote (Landmine @ Nov 19 2019 10:52am)
Not good... Vindman looking like a crook and a liar.
All Vindman is doing is confirming exactly what was written on the white house official transcript.
That isn't lying, you should read a dictionary
Also, he isn't a crook. If you need a definition of that, look at the Orange fgt.
This post was edited by IroningTheMaiden on Nov 19 2019 10:35am