Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 5 2020 11:18pm)
I reject and condemn the assertion that people who incorporate statistics and count white people who are murdered by police have a less rounded and less accurate argument than the BLM narrative.
I'm not saying that your argument is necessarily less rounded or accurate in its entirety that exists in the ether. I'm talking about what's currently being presented in this thread, which is reflective of what's presented by people more generally.
Black Lives Matter forms its argument based off of:
1. The number of black people killed by police.
2. The circumstances surrounding the initial contact and conduct of police.
3. The lack of accountability and consequences.
When people present statistics on the number of white people killed by police, they are only starting on point 1, and then it ends. I'm asking you, and/or anyone else who feels that there's a compelling argument to be made, to present information that furthers the argument and matches the leg work done by Black Lives Matter that covers those additional areas.