d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Democrat Division Megathread
Prev15758596061205Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jul 3 2019 05:52pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 3 2019 06:24pm)
Just not principled enough to actually criticize the current president, who no one would mistake for a libertarian. It's the Stefan Molyneux lane... appealing to Trump supporters by only criticizing the libs, while throwing in the disclaimer "but I don't even support the president!!!".


Talkin' out of both sides of his mouth -- have cake eat cake.

Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jul 3 2019 05:53pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 3 2019 04:27pm)
Not criticizing him enough to appease the deranged leftists and soyboys =/= not actually criticizing the current president


you are really terrible at having a conversation
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jul 3 2019 06:07pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 3 Jul 2019 19:27)
Not criticizing him enough to appease the deranged leftists and soyboys =/= not actually criticizing the current president


Quote (LA-Leviathan @ 3 Jul 2019 19:38)
3 statements that mean nothing followed by 3 more that mean nothing. Impressive.


Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Jul 2019 19:41)
ding ding


great posts my friends!

Quote (IceMage @ 3 Jul 2019 19:36)
See, you even use the silly insults that the Trump cult does. You're basically part of the Trump cult culture, while maintaining the idea in your head that you aren't a Trump supporter.

Trump's personality cult is powerful. It's turned Goom into a more right-wing populist, and it's done the same to you. Just be honest about it.

Trump being elected President revealed you to be just another anti-American snarky privileged lefty

the accusers always tend to cloak themselves until the truth makes their reality all-too apparent

This post was edited by excellence on Jul 3 2019 06:10pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jul 3 2019 08:48pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 3 2019 06:36pm)
See, you even use the silly insults that the Trump cult does. You're basically part of the Trump cult culture, while maintaining the idea in your head that you aren't a Trump supporter.

Trump's personality cult is powerful. It's turned Goom into a more right-wing populist, and it's done the same to you. Just be honest about it.


You're missing the mark.

Trump is opposed by a party that supports open borders. There's a strong undercurrent within the party that doesn't believe candidates have a right to lead if they're white and male. Obama could not run in this environment and win.

Trump is not so attractive that everyone wants to follow the beat of his drum; the alternative is just worse.
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jul 3 2019 09:20pm
Quote (bogie160 @ 4 Jul 2019 04:48)
You're missing the mark.

Trump is opposed by a party that supports open borders. There's a strong undercurrent within the party that doesn't believe candidates have a right to lead if they're white and male. Obama could not run in this environment and win.

Trump is not so attractive that everyone wants to follow the beat of his drum; the alternative is just worse.


Agreed, with everything.

About the bolded part:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/06/28/democrats-debate-immigration-landmine-227247

Quote
here is President Barack Obama in a 2014 interview with ABC News: “That is our direct message to the families in Central America: Do not send your children to the borders.” The U.S. Border Patrol, he said, should be able to “stem the flow of illegal crossings and speed the return of those who do cross over ... Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable.”

When Obama presented his health care plan to Congress in 2009, he specifically asserted that undocumented immigrants would not be eligible for subsidies.


Quote
Right now, all of the candidates (except perhaps for Biden [...]) have put themselves clearly on the record for sharply liberalizing immigration, and none appears to be willing to say anything with any specificity about one question: Should there be any limit on who gets to come to the United States? Is there room enough, are there jobs enough, is there health care funding enough, to accommodate everyone? Right now, it seems clear that if either of the past two Democratic presidents had shown up Thursday and advocated their positions from five or 20 years ago [...] they would have been booed off their own party's stage.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jul 4 2019 02:38am
Quote (bogie160 @ Jul 3 2019 09:48pm)
You're missing the mark.

Trump is opposed by a party that supports open borders. There's a strong undercurrent within the party that doesn't believe candidates have a right to lead if they're white and male. Obama could not run in this environment and win.

Trump is not so attractive that everyone wants to follow the beat of his drum; the alternative is just worse.


Let's leave Goom/Cambo aside.

I don't really understand majoring in the minors. Yes, some of the party is moving left on certain issues, sometimes in comical ways(no abortion restrictions, tear down the border wall, no criminal penalty for crossing illegally, etc). But we can look to the 2016 primary and find nutty positions from the most popular candidates. Dismantle federal agencies(including IRS), intentionally target civilians in war, physically deport every illegal from the country, ban all foreign Muslims from entering, repeal Roe, leave NATO, let Japan get nukes, etc.

Why do we take one side's radicalism seriously, and hand-wave the other side's away? Can't we be nuanced with both sides and realize that even if one of the more left-wing nominees becomes president, they almost certainly won't have the political will or support to do many of these radical things?

So, if you want to make the argument that Trump will move the country forward better than the Democratic nominee, fair enough. But nutpicking from one side isn't a good argument.

----

Speaking of comical positions from the left:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/betsy-ross-flag-controversy-progressivism/

This post was edited by IceMage on Jul 4 2019 02:41am
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jul 4 2019 12:55pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 4 2019 03:38am)
Let's leave Goom/Cambo aside.

I don't really understand majoring in the minors. Yes, some of the party is moving left on certain issues, sometimes in comical ways(no abortion restrictions, tear down the border wall, no criminal penalty for crossing illegally, etc). But we can look to the 2016 primary and find nutty positions from the most popular candidates. Dismantle federal agencies(including IRS), intentionally target civilians in war, physically deport every illegal from the country, ban all foreign Muslims from entering, repeal Roe, leave NATO, let Japan get nukes, etc.

Why do we take one side's radicalism seriously, and hand-wave the other side's away? Can't we be nuanced with both sides and realize that even if one of the more left-wing nominees becomes president, they almost certainly won't have the political will or support to do many of these radical things?

So, if you want to make the argument that Trump will move the country forward better than the Democratic nominee, fair enough. But nutpicking from one side isn't a good argument.

----

Speaking of comical positions from the left:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/betsy-ross-flag-controversy-progressivism/


And those positions (i.e. the 2016 campaign) were taken seriously, shouldn't we be taking these seriously as well?

The far left has dramatically more say than they did 10 years ago. I think you fundamentally misunderstand where that movement is headed if you think a candidate is going to suddenly become the second coming of Bill Clinton in office. Those Democrats (Manchin aside) are Republicans now.

Besides, what sort of cuckhold votes for a party that despises them, all in the hope that they really won't follow through on the threat? There's a reason Clinton lost the white male vote by 30 points.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jul 4 2019 01:37pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jul 4 2019 01:55pm)
And those positions (i.e. the 2016 campaign) were taken seriously, shouldn't we be taking these seriously as well?

The far left has dramatically more say than they did 10 years ago. I think you fundamentally misunderstand where that movement is headed if you think a candidate is going to suddenly become the second coming of Bill Clinton in office. Those Democrats (Manchin aside) are Republicans now.

Besides, what sort of cuckhold votes for a party that despises them, all in the hope that they really won't follow through on the threat? There's a reason Clinton lost the white male vote by 30 points.


They weren't taken that seriously by Republicans who held their nose to vote for Trump. And rightly so. The radical positions from Trump that I laid out haven't come to fruition, because he doesn't have the political will or support.

I've never argued that a third way, Bill Clinton type Democrat will get elected. But it's also laughable to think all the moderates have moved to the Republican side. You guys elected a reality show host/fake billionaire who embarrasses himself and our country practically every day. Even if I were a conservative or right-wing populist, I would oppose Trump because he's a horrible person who is insanely incompetent. Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, or practically any other Republican would be much more successful at achieving conservative objectives.

Bogie, the fact that you think I'm a cuckold because I'm a white male who will vote Democrat shows just how silly your views of the Democratic party are. You're just as disconnected from political reality as the liberals who think the Republican party are white supremacists. It's boring and lazy.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jul 4 2019 01:39pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jul 4 2019 11:55am)
And those positions (i.e. the 2016 campaign) were taken seriously, shouldn't we be taking these seriously as well?

The far left has dramatically more say than they did 10 years ago. I think you fundamentally misunderstand where that movement is headed if you think a candidate is going to suddenly become the second coming of Bill Clinton in office. Those Democrats (Manchin aside) are Republicans now.

Besides, what sort of cuckhold votes for a party that despises them, all in the hope that they really won't follow through on the threat? There's a reason Clinton lost the white male vote by 30 points.


Republicans now but they were always conservative

The country is less conservative and the politicians reflect it.

Bill was a lock them up President. We still have that in Harris who near the lead

Conservatives have been calling everyone far left for 2 decades+

Fox news pushed it against Democrat establishment news networks that were pro war. Everything is far left to staunch conservatives.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15758596061205Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll