Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 2 2022 08:25pm)
I feel like 99% of the time most sanctions end up hurting the average pleb over the people you would want to actually hurt. Look at Iran or North Korea for example, you think the top people in charge are drastically impacted and have degraded ways of life? Mostly not.
I think some sanctions will remain while others are cannibalistic in nature, at least for many countries in Europe. 10 years from now, lets say Russia pivoted to the east, to Chinese banks, corporations, investments, loans, etc you think Europe is better off by losing that as a market and having to deal with less economic leverage in Russia? I think not.
I don't think a country with Russia's demographics would cause much difference to Europe. We've basically locked Russia out of the Western economy and that may hit GDP growth by 0.8% (at most) according to forecasts, if it isn't affecting us now then why will it affect us in a few decades when Russia has a lower population and when their industries are centered around commodities we'll have pivoted away from? Asia is where the future business is, with rapidly increasing incomes and population growth in pockets
As bad as it sounds, the people do need to suffer in order to put pressure on the Kremlin to change course. If the Kremlin has got such a grip on the state where this doesn't change anything, like North Korea, then sanctions won't be as effective. But even if that's the case, intelligence also suggests the Kremlin has been severely limited in their ability to fund a war since the 2014 sanctions. It's probably why it took them 8 years to make a move on Ukraine and why some of their military equipment is dilapidated and their organisation in this war has been poor so far
This post was edited by dro94 on Mar 2 2022 03:02pm