Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Nov 17 2019 11:05pm)

Nine more diplomats and national security officials — many of whom have already appeared to testify behind closed-doors — will testify publicly in the next week.


Tuesday, November 19:
State Department official and advisor to Vice President Mike Pence Jennifer Williams and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, an expert on Eastern European affairs on the National Security Council will testify in the morning.
Former US special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker and former NSC staffer Tim Morrison will testify publicly in the afternoon.
Wednesday, November 20:
US ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland will testify in the morning.
Pentagon official Laura Cooper— whose closed-door testimony on October 23 was stormed by a group of 30 GOP lawmakers — and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale will appear in the afternoon.
Thursday, November 21:
Former NSC senior director for Russian and Eurasian affairs Fiona Hill will testify publicly before the committees.

source:
https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/impeachment-hearings-schedule-who-is-publicly-testifying-next-2019-11

with a link to each witness (click their names)

example

https://www.businessinsider.com/category/alexander-vindman?IR=T

huhuhu

http://r74.cooltext.com/rendered/cooltext341690381121116.png

Quote (Ghot @ 18 Nov 2019 05:11)

A couple aides and a has been NSC director, Sondland, which I already mentioned... and Vindman who has already testified in secret.

Nothing Burger. Or rien burger, for the short bus.

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Nov 17 2019 11:14pm)

From the stuff you refuse to read:

Vindman is one of the most significant and damaging witnesses to testify so far in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

Vindman has direct knowledge of the phone call at the center of the impeachment probe, and he confirmed that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine's president.
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where the gain would be for the president in investigating the son of a political opponent," he testified.

...

Vindman immediately flagged Trump's conversation to Eisenberg. But Eisenberg told Vindman not to tell anyone about what he'd heard on the phone call between Trump and Zelensky.

When Vindman told Eisenberg about the call, he testified that Eisenberg told him he "shouldn't talk to any other people" about it.


:thumbsup:

Amazing cant wait for public hearings next week! Have a good one :D

/e the full article:

https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/biggest-takeaways-alexander-vindman-impeachment-testimony-2019-11

Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 17 2019 11:07pm)

Yes its hearsay and for a whistleblower that is fine. If Tony tells you he killed his wife and shes been missing for 6 months your testimony is hearsay, but thats fine to get an investigation going, its not admissable in court but its fine to get a warrant to gather evidence.

Quote (kalelvszod @ Nov 17 2019 11:22pm)

This is true

Quote (kalelvszod @ Nov 17 2019 10:22pm)

This is true

Quote (Ghot @ Nov 17 2019 10:24pm)

No that's NOT true.

If Tony said he killed his wife, he's admitting to a crime. That's NOT hearsay. And it's totally admissible in court.

Did ALL of you skip Civics class? I mean... sheesh. :/

Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 17 2019 11:26pm)

So when they try to get the name or investigate the whistleblower know that's just an effort to delegitimize the investigation into Trump. His/her testimony isnt acceptable as evidence and if the tip wasnt reasonable we wouldnt have trumps own staff saying they heard the same thing.

Quote (Ghot @ Nov 17 2019 10:29pm)

Well, yes the whistleblower's testimony is hearsay and not admissible. That's true.


But Tony? admitting to killing his wife is not hearsay and is admissible. <---- This is the reason we have the 5th amendment btw.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 17 2019 11:40pm)

Its only not hearsay if hes making the admission under oath. Me telling the court he admitted it is hearsay.