Well at this stage it's time to help yourself, maybe Gordon Sondland or Alex. Windman public hearings next week will fix it.

Trump blocked the money because he was seeking "big stuff" aka investigation on political opponent, so obvious.

/nb: and the money was finally delivered JUST AFTER the WH heard about the Whistleblower

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 17 2019 09:34pm

I anxiously await hearing the details surrounding this information but at same time does not excuse all the other corruption on the the democrats side.

It hasn't been confirmed, not even close. In fact the opposite has pretty much been confirmed.
Saucy hates Trump, and isn't always accurate about information when he posts.


/e In fact the Dems seem to be scraping the bottom of the barrel now. We're down to testimony from... aides, and Sondland who's gonna amend his testimony for the 2nd time, this coming week.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 17 2019 09:48pm

The whistleblower reported 3rd hand information so an investigation could start. If Trump had turned over the recorded call and there had been nothing the story would have never gotten even to the media.

How are the democrats shady here? And how are they more shady than an executive forbidding testimony from anybody with first hand knowledge?

"Whatabout" / "but they are all corrupt". Let's blow up it all.



So you have people who said they were sure, under oath, that trump did not tried to do a this(money) for that(investigation, public claim) ?
No you don't, and you will dodge.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 17 2019 09:50pm

Post #526, first pic. Under oath, didn't even have to think about it. I watched the entire testimony by Yovanovitch. :/

You know that even Frenchmen go to hell for lying... right?

I'd like my Nothing Burger, with some Icemage lettuce, a slice of Fender cheese and some of that special Saucy.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 17 2019 09:56pm

Well technically isnt the whistleblower knowledge/testimony hearsay? Schiff has been executing and controlling this whole thing he is a demoxrat first and has been blocking and preventing republicans from proceeding with their own investigation.this does seem a whole lot different then the clinton proceedings if i remember correct. Seems if your a democrat your above persecution.



I agree

This whole farce is all about making Trump look LESS electable come 2020.


/e The Dems already know that the Senate won't oust Trump. The Republicans are still behind Trump 100%. The taxpayers get to foot this bill... too.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 17 2019 09:59pm

Nine more diplomats and national security officials — many of whom have already appeared to testify behind closed-doors — will testify publicly in the next week.


Tuesday, November 19:
State Department official and advisor to Vice President Mike Pence Jennifer Williams and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, an expert on Eastern European affairs on the National Security Council will testify in the morning.
Former US special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker and former NSC staffer Tim Morrison will testify publicly in the afternoon.
Wednesday, November 20:
US ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland will testify in the morning.
Pentagon official Laura Cooper— whose closed-door testimony on October 23 was stormed by a group of 30 GOP lawmakers — and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale will appear in the afternoon.
Thursday, November 21:
Former NSC senior director for Russian and Eurasian affairs Fiona Hill will testify publicly before the committees.

source:
https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/impeachment-hearings-schedule-who-is-publicly-testifying-next-2019-11

with a link to each witness (click their names)

example

https://www.businessinsider.com/category/alexander-vindman?IR=T

huhuhu









This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 17 2019 10:10pm

Yes its hearsay and for a whistleblower that is fine. If Tony tells you he killed his wife and shes been missing for 6 months your testimony is hearsay, but thats fine to get an investigation going, its not admissable in court but its fine to get a warrant to gather evidence.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Nov 17 2019 10:08pm