It means that Yovanovitch was a fairly useless witness who didnt advance their impeachment case and was only brought out so Dems could launch some cheap, emotional appeals to suburban women. That Yovanovitch herself didnt notice Trump doing anything illegal doesnt prove that he's innocent.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 17 2019 05:14pm

She also answered YES to the question: Did Joe Biden withhold $1 billion USD from Ukraine until Shokin was fired.
All other testimony in these hearings was hearsay.
The only "evidence" FOR holding these hearings is a 4th hand report from a whistle blower that was coached by Schiff, and who's testimony hasn't been seen by anyone but the Dems.

There is absolutely NO reason to even HAVE this inquiry. Nor was there reason for the Kavanaugh hearings or for the Russiagate investigation.


This has been one long hoax by the Dems, and should be stopped.

kek if true

It's... true.

My favorite part of this impeachment hearing is when a witness said the POTUS was threatening and intimidating her awhile said POTUS was being intimidating on Twitter in real time.

The cultists endorsing this behavior here should be embarrassed.

Actually, she didn't know about the tweet till Schiff told her.

you can’t ‘threaten a witness’ when they say under oath they didn’t witness anything

stick to bragging about how ‘loaded’ you are like a typical pale pasty privileged lefty wannabe boomer lmfao, pathetic..

She was a witness of what happened in Ukraine embassy during her time. Everything she said was under witness protection rules/laws.
Lowballs trolling not allowed

Maybe or because this whistle blower is the invisible trump card of democrats(no pun intended lol)maybe the same goes for the transcript. All of this is shady af on both sides but more democrats than gop imo.